Women, peace and security

International Development Committee Closed Inquiry
Opened: 7 Mar 2025 Closed: 10 Jun 2026 Parliament page
The International Development Committee is launching a new inquiry into how the UK Government is involving the needs and voices of women in its development efforts. The cross-party committee of MPs will explore the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda, adopted by the United Nations, considering how this agenda is … Read more
12 Recommendations
11 Conclusions
1 Report
3 Oral sessions
3 Events
Oral evidence sessions 3 sessions
Women, Peace and Security
Alistair Carns DSO OBE MC MP · Ministry of Defence Chris Elmore MP · Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office Emily Maltman · Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office Stuart Mills · Ministry of Defence
Women, Peace and Security
Eva Tabbasam · Gender Action for Peace and Security (GAPS) Professor Toni Haastrup · The University of Manchester Reem Alsalem · United Nations
Women, Peace and Security
Fawzia Koofi · Afghan Parliament Fiona Kilpatrick-Cooper · The HALO Trust Hanin Ahmed · Emergency Response Rooms, Sudan Stephanie Siddall · Women for Women International The Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon
Recommendations & Conclusions
2 results
3 Recommendation Rejected
10th Report - Peace under pressure…
The Government should explain why it did not convene a single dedicated session on Women,...
The Government should explain why it did not convene a single dedicated session on Women, Peace and Security during its time as President of the United Nations Security Council in February 2026. The Government should set out in its response … Read more
Government Response
The government explicitly disagrees with the recommendation, explaining that it deliberately advanced the WPS agenda by integrating women's voices and perspectives into country-specific UN Security Council discussions, which it considered more meaningful and impactful than a standalone session.
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
View details
14 Conclusion Rejected
10th Report - Peace under pressure…
The commitments in the current National Action Plan lack dedicated funding, meaning that commitments are...
The commitments in the current National Action Plan lack dedicated funding, meaning that commitments are not resourced and their implementation is largely dependent on political will. (Conclusion, Paragraph 69)
Government Response
The government partially agrees, but rejects the premise that commitments lack dedicated funding by detailing over £3.5 million in support provided to women's rights organisations and committing similar funding for FY26/27. It also highlights that WPS is treated as core business and institutionalised across the MOD.
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
View details
Government Response AI assessment · 23 of 12 classified

Total 12 recs + 11 conclusions