The Elections Bill

Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee Closed Inquiry
Opened: 20 Jul 2021 Closed: 16 Jun 2022 Parliament page
The Committee has launched an inquiry to examine all aspects of the Elections Bill.
27 Recommendations
23 Conclusions
1 Report
2 Oral sessions
9 Letters
2 Events
Activity timeline 13 events
13 Dec
2021
14 Sep
2021
7 Sep
2021
Oral evidence
Oral evidence sessions 2 sessions
Chloe Smith · Cabinet Office
The Elections Bill
Angela Kitching · Age UK Dr Jessica Garland · Electoral Reform Society Dr Sam Power · School of Law, Politics and Sociology, University of Sussex Helen Mountfield QC · Matrix Chambers Louise Edwards · Electoral Commission Pete O’Doherty · City of London Police Peter Stanyon · Association of Electoral Administrators Professor Justin Fisher · Brunel University London Professor Toby James · University of East Anglia (UEA) The Lord Evans of Weardale KCB DL · Committee on Standards in Public Life
Title HC No. Published Items Response
Fifth Report - The Elections Bill HC 597 13 Dec 2021 50 Responded
Recommendations & Conclusions
11 results
9 Conclusion Not Addressed
Fifth Report - The Elections Bill
The Committee further notes the Government’s decision to amend the scope of the Bill by...
The Committee further notes the Government’s decision to amend the scope of the Bill by including additional measures on the voting system for all Police and Crime Commissioner, Combined Authority Mayoral and London Mayoral elections after the Bill was introduced, … Read more
Government Response
The Government responded with a general denial of insufficient pre-legislative consultation and scrutiny, which did not directly address the committee's specific concern about new measures being added to the Bill mid-way through its parliamentary process.
10 Recommendation Not Addressed
Fifth Report - The Elections Bill
Given the lack of pre-legislative consultation and scrutiny on this constitutionally important Bill and the...
Given the lack of pre-legislative consultation and scrutiny on this constitutionally important Bill and the significant change in scope of the Bill after its introduction and Second Reading, the Government should include a statutory commitment to post- legislative scrutiny of … Read more
Government Response
The government refutes claims of insufficient prior consultation and highlights policy statements already published on voter ID, stating they will share further implementation planning information, but does not address the recommendation for a statutory commitment to post-legislative scrutiny.
11 Recommendation Not Addressed
Fifth Report - The Elections Bill
We recommend that the Government amend the Bill to introduce a requirement that, within five...
We recommend that the Government amend the Bill to introduce a requirement that, within five years of the entry into force of the Act, a committee comprising a majority of Members of the House of Commons is established to review … Read more
Government Response
The government's response discusses past consultations and recent policy statements on voter identification and other changes but does not address the specific recommendation to amend the Bill to establish a new committee for post-legislative review of the Act.
14 Recommendation Not Addressed
Fifth Report - The Elections Bill
The Government should present the draft secondary legislation as early as possible, as committed to...
The Government should present the draft secondary legislation as early as possible, as committed to by then responsible Minister, Chloe Smith MP, to enable due consideration by both Houses and stakeholders of the proposed secondary legislation that will provide further … Read more
Government Response
The government refutes claims of insufficient prior consultation and highlights policy statements already published on voter ID, stating they will share further implementation planning information in due course, but does not commit to presenting draft secondary legislation early.
17 Conclusion Not Addressed
Fifth Report - The Elections Bill
The Government presented to the Committee a case that there is underreporting of personation at...
The Government presented to the Committee a case that there is underreporting of personation at UK elections. While the Government refused to be drawn on how extensive it believes the underreporting has been, it has implied that it is at … Read more
Government Response
The government's response focuses on its Public Sector Equality Duty, the accessibility of voter ID, and the provision of free Voter Cards, completely failing to address the Committee's conclusion regarding the lack of a robust evidence base for widespread personation.
18 Conclusion Not Addressed
Fifth Report - The Elections Bill
There have been concerns raised that introducing a voter ID requirement will negatively impact voter...
There have been concerns raised that introducing a voter ID requirement will negatively impact voter turnout. The evidence from what happened in Northern Ireland in 2003 following the move to a photographic ID suggests that a reduction of around 2.3% … Read more
Government Response
The government's response emphasizes its Public Sector Equality Duty, the accessibility of voter ID provisions, and the availability of free Voter Cards, but does not directly address the Committee's conclusion that a reduction in voter turnout is possible.
26 Conclusion Not Addressed
Fifth Report - The Elections Bill
We agree with the Government that it is sensible to limit the number of proxy...
We agree with the Government that it is sensible to limit the number of proxy votes that can be exercised by individuals to two for domestic electors, and four for overseas electors. (Paragraph 118) Overseas electors and changes to the … Read more
Government Response
The government's response discusses postal voting measures and their implementation, including a three-year limit on applications, without directly addressing the committee's agreement on proxy vote limits for domestic and overseas electors.
27 Conclusion Not Addressed
Fifth Report - The Elections Bill
The Committee welcomes the removal of the 15-year limit on overseas electors participating in UK...
The Committee welcomes the removal of the 15-year limit on overseas electors participating in UK parliamentary elections.
Government Response
The government's response details its rationale for changes to EU citizens' voting and candidacy rights and its stance against residency-based voting, without addressing the committee's welcome for the removal of the 15-year limit on overseas electors.
29 Conclusion Not Addressed
Fifth Report - The Elections Bill
The Committee notes widespread concerns presented in written and oral evidence to this Committee that...
The Committee notes widespread concerns presented in written and oral evidence to this Committee that there was no formal or public consultation on these proposals and that there is a lack of supporting evidence to demonstrate that the proposed measures … Read more
Government Response
The government's response provides its rationale for changes to EU citizens' voting and candidacy rights but does not address the committee's noted concerns about the lack of formal consultation or supporting evidence for these proposals.
47 Conclusion Not Addressed
Fifth Report - The Elections Bill
We note the Government’s insistence that it is not able to incorporate a number of...
We note the Government’s insistence that it is not able to incorporate a number of measures in the Bill now that it has been introduced. However, the Government has changed the scope of the Bill after introduction by amending the … Read more
Government Response
The government's response addresses a recommendation from an unspecified paragraph (193) regarding Electoral Commission accountability and its own reform proposals, entirely failing to engage with the Committee's conclusion about the government's ability to amend the Bill.
50 Conclusion Not Addressed
Fifth Report - The Elections Bill
Regardless of the benefits or disadvantages of the changes made by the Bill to the...
Regardless of the benefits or disadvantages of the changes made by the Bill to the electoral system for those offices, the manner in which the proposed legislative change was brought about is unsatisfactory. Making changes such as this after the … Read more
Government Response
The government explicitly disagrees with a different recommendation (paragraph 193) and defends its proposals for reforming the accountability of the Electoral Commission, failing to address the committee's criticism of the legislative process for introducing changes after Second Reading.
Government Response AI assessment · 50 of 27 classified

Total 27 recs + 23 conclusions
Correspondence 9 letters
27 Apr 2022 From committee Letter to Rt Hon Michael Gove MP, Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities and Minister for Intergovernmental Relations, Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities on the Elections Bill, dated 26.4.22
Parliament page
25 Apr 2022 To committee Letter from Rt Hon Michael Gove MP, Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities and Minister for Intergovernmental Relations on the Elections Bill, dated 25.4.22
Parliament page
20 Apr 2022 From committee Letter to Rt Hon Michael Gove MP, Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Minister for Intergovernmental Relations on the Elections Bill, dated 12.4.22
Parliament page
1 Mar 2022 To committee Letter from Matt Stringer, Chief Executive Officer, Royal National Institute of Blind People on the Elections Bill, dated 23.2.22
Parliament page
11 Jan 2022 To committee Letter from Tom Brake, Director, Unlock Democracy et al on the Elections Bill report, dated 5.1.22
Parliament page
22 Oct 2021 From committee Letter to Rt Hon Michael Gove MP, Secretary of State, Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities on the Elections Bill – follow up to the oral evidence session of 14th September, dated 23.9.21
Parliament page
21 Oct 2021 To committee Letter from Kemi Badenoch MP, Joint Minister of State for Equalities and Levelling Up Communities on the Elections Bill - Follow up to the oral evidence of 14.9.21, dated 7.10.21
Parliament page
14 Sep 2021 To committee Letter from Chloe Smith MP, Minister of State for the Constitution and Devolution on the Elections Bill: Impact Assessment and other matters, dated 8.9.21
Parliament page
7 Sep 2021 From committee Letter to Chloe Smith MP, Minister of State for the Constitution and Devolution on Elections Bill impact assessment and other matters, dated 27.8.21
Parliament page