Review of the 2024 general election

Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee Closed Inquiry
Opened: 3 Dec 2024 Closed: 11 Feb 2026 Parliament page
Following the publication of the Electoral Commission report on the general election 2024 , the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee are considering the issue of the administration, process and conduct of the 2024 general election and how these could be improved for future elections. Read the call for evidence … Read more
20 Recommendations
49 Conclusions
1 Report
3 Oral sessions
3 Events
Activity timeline 8 events
16 Oct
2025
Report published
22 Jul
2025
Report published
18 Mar
2025
Oral evidence
18 Mar
2025
Formal meeting (oral evidence session) · Room 5, Palace of Westminster
21 Jan
2025
Oral evidence
21 Jan
2025
Formal meeting (oral evidence session) · Room 15, Palace of Westminster
7 Jan
2025
Oral evidence
7 Jan
2025
Formal meeting (oral evidence session) · Room 16, Palace of Westminster
Oral evidence sessions 3 sessions
18 Mar 2025
View on parliament.uk
Rushanara Ali MP · Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Stuart Ison · Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
21 Jan 2025
View on parliament.uk
David Gold · Royal Mail Laura Lock · Association of Electoral Administrators Peter Stanyon · Association of Electoral Administrators Ricky McAulay · Royal Mail
7 Jan 2025
View on parliament.uk
Jackie Killeen · Electoral Commission John Pullinger CB · Electoral Commission Vijay Rangarajan · Electoral Commission
Title HC No. Published Items Response
2nd Report – Review of the 2024 general election HC 487 22 Jul 2025 69 Responded
Recommendations & Conclusions
9 results
Clear
17 Conclusion Not Addressed
2nd Report – Review of the 2024 ge…
External supplier dependence creates significant weakness in election system
Elections have become dependent on external suppliers over which the Government have little control. This creates points of weakness and even potential failure in our elections system. (Conclusion, Paragraph 71)
Government Response
The government's response does not directly address the committee's conclusion regarding the dependency of elections on external suppliers and the vulnerabilities this creates. It reiterates that planning is the responsibility of Returning Officers and the Electoral Commission, and rejects the production of an annual readiness report.
View details
21 Conclusion Not Addressed
2nd Report – Review of the 2024 ge…
Awkward election timing places significant pressure on administration and supplier markets.
The timing of the election placed extra pressure on the administration of the election, and placed stress on the thin supplier market. It also meant certain areas of the UK, such as Scotland and Northern Ireland, were placed at an … Read more
Government Response
The government's response does not directly address the committee's conclusion about the administrative pressures and disadvantages caused by the timing of the general election.
View details
37 Conclusion Not Addressed
2nd Report – Review of the 2024 ge…
Unclear election mail delivery timelines cause candidate concerns despite high success rates
We appreciate the Royal Mail’s assurances that over 99% of all election mail was delivered on time. However, we are concerned that despite this a number of candidates felt their messaging was not delivered when they expected. To ease concerns … Read more
Government Response
The government outlines changes to improve resilience in the postal and proxy voting system, but does not specifically commit to making timelines for delivery of different election materials clear and tight. It rejects next-day delivery for poll cards and rolling ballot pack printing as impractical or too costly.
View details
46 Conclusion Not Addressed
2nd Report – Review of the 2024 ge…
Automatically send postal votes to all registered overseas voters as an interim measure.
While these and other options are being considered, we agree with the Electoral Commission that, as an interim measure, all overseas voters that are registered should automatically receive a postal vote, meaning they would have to actively apply to vote … Read more
Government Response
The government states that overseas electors continue to have options for voting by proxy, post, or in person, and that proxy voters can acquire postal votes. However, it does not address the specific recommendation to automatically send postal votes to all registered overseas voters as an interim measure.
View details
50 Recommendation Not Addressed
2nd Report – Review of the 2024 ge…
Increase voter awareness of available support and equipment through clearer communications to voters.
We recommend that more is done to make voters aware that additional support and equipment may be requested. This should be done through clearer advice in communications to voters. (Recommendation, Paragraph 129) 71
Government Response
The government discusses its Accessibility of Elections Working Group and its intention to investigate how existing data might be used, but this response does not address the recommendation to improve voter awareness of available support and equipment.
View details
54 Recommendation Not Addressed
2nd Report – Review of the 2024 ge…
Establish clear criteria for assessing voter ID effectiveness and mitigate negative turnout impacts.
The Government should set out clear criteria for judging the effectiveness of the voter ID policy. This statement should include criteria for assessing the acceptability of any impact of the policy on turnout. A detailed assessment of the general impact … Read more
Government Response
The government defends its voter ID policy and cites existing research from the Electoral Commission and IFF Research. While it announces that UK-issued bank cards will be accepted as voter ID to increase accessibility, it does not commit to setting clear criteria for judging policy effectiveness or for detailed post-election reviews of turnout impacts.
View details
55 Recommendation Not Addressed
2nd Report – Review of the 2024 ge…
Routinely collect election data to properly evaluate voter ID effectiveness and usage patterns.
Our assessment is that the longer voter ID prevails the more it will become accepted, reducing, though not removing, the prevention and discouragement effect. It is unfortunate that data was not regularly collected at polls in Northern Ireland, in particular … Read more
Government Response
The government's response focuses on defending its voter ID policy, announcing the acceptance of bank cards, and committing to create a digital Voter Authority Certificate and accept digital forms of existing photo ID. It does not, however, commit to considering or implementing the routine collection of specific data points to evaluate voter ID effectiveness.
View details
59 Recommendation Not Addressed
2nd Report – Review of the 2024 ge…
Introduce a voter vouching system for those lacking photo ID on election day
Alternatively, the Government should consider the Electoral Commission’s recommendation to introduce a vouching system, which would provide an emergency system for people who do not have, or find they have lost, an acceptable form of ID on the day of … Read more
Government Response
The government's response does not address the committee's recommendation to consider introducing a vouching system for emergency voter identification.
View details
66 Recommendation Not Addressed
2nd Report – Review of the 2024 ge…
Ofcom and Electoral Commission must set timescale for tackling online electoral abuse
We recommend that Ofcom in coordination with the Electoral Commission set out the timescale for setting up arrangements to address online abuse and intimidation at elections. (Recommendation, Paragraph 173) 74
Government Response
The government's response details the implementation of the Online Safety Act (OSA) and its provisions, including commencement dates for certain offenses and duties, but does not commit to Ofcom and the Electoral Commission setting out a joint timescale for addressing online abuse and intimidation at elections.
View details
Government Response AI assessment · 69 of 20 classified
Accepted 13
Accepted in Part 8
Acknowledged 12
Deferred 9
Not Addressed 9
Rejected 18
Total 20 recs + 49 conclusions