29
US and EU AI governance approaches reveal downsides in scope and implementation.
Conclusion
Both the US and EU approaches to AI governance have their downsides. The scope of the former only imposes a requirement on Federal bodies and relies on voluntary commitments from leading developers. The latter has been criticised for its top- down, prescriptive approach and the potential for uneven implementation across different member states.
Paragraph Reference
131
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 10 January 2025. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document.
Source
Report
Third Report - Governance of artificial intelligence (AI)
28 May 2024
HC 38
Addressee Bodies
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Timeline
Recommendation age
2.3 yrs
Report published
28 May 2024