62
Deferred
Conduct international discussions on increased existential AI risk at AI Safety Summits.
Conclusion
Should the acuteness of existential AI risk be judged to have increased, discussions regarding the implications and possible response should take place in international fora, such as AI Safety Summits. (Paragraph 211) 60 Governance of artificial intelligence (AI)
Government Response Summary
The government responds by outlining its domestic plans to propose legislation and consult on a regulatory regime for powerful AI models to address immediate risks, and mentions existing national security community work, rather than directly addressing international discussions regarding increased existential AI risk.
Government Response
Deferred
Government Response
Deferred
HM Government
Deferred
The AI White Paper was published during the last administration and acknowledged the importance to tackle risks with widespread impact. The Government is proposing to establish the appropriate legislation to place requirements on those working to develop the most powerful artificial intelligence models. As part of this, the Government will consult on how best to establish a regulatory regime that will address the most immediate risks. The CAIRF works closely with the UK national security community while considering AI risks with national security implications.
Source
Report
Third Report - Governance of artificial intelligence (AI)
28 May 2024
HC 38
Addressee Bodies
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Timeline
Recommendation age
2.0 yrs
Report published
28 May 2024