124
Not Addressed
Other criticisms of UKRI funding brought to our attention included, from Dr Vicky Johnson, University...
Conclusion
Other criticisms of UKRI funding brought to our attention included, from Dr Vicky Johnson, University of the Highlands, that its “money tends to go to the older universities, and not the post-1992s or the very new universities”.290 Also, from Professor James Conroy, University of Glasgow, that “everything is not sewn together quite as well as it 279 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, UKRI Framework Document, May 2018, p 33 280 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, UKRI Framework Document, May 2018, p 33 281 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, UKRI Framework Document, May 2018, p 33 282 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, UKRI Framework Document, May 2018, p 19 283 Q257 284 Q257 285 National Audit Office, UK Research and Innovation’s management of the Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund, 5 February 2021, p 30 286 London = 17%, South East England = 27.2% (National Audit Office, UK Research and Innovation’s management of the Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund, 5 February 2021, p 30) 287 National Audit Office, UK Research and Innovation’s management of the Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund, 5 February 2021, p 30 288 RSE Young Academy of Scotland (USC0006) p 6 289 Q257 290 Q9 48 Universities and Scotland might be” as “UKRI is supposed to be bringing everything together, but it still feels like separate research councils under an umbrella organisation.”291 Furthermore, the RSE Young Academy of Scotland told us that: Research funding allocated by UKRI also appears biased by gender, ethnicity and age; funding success rates are systematically lower for women; in engineering and physical sciences, the gap deepens as grants get larger, with the difference in success rates even greater (over 10%) between white and black and other minority ethnic groups investigators. This is a particular threat for Scottish universities, when funding diversity and inclusivity is essential to foster innovation, growth and
Government Response Summary
The government describes its process for appointing a balanced UKRI Board and its mechanisms for engaging with Devolved Administrations and stakeholders to understand the UK R&D landscape, but does not address the specific criticisms about funding bias towards older universities or based on gender, ethnicity, and age.
Government Response
Not Addressed
Government Response
Not Addressed
HM Government
Not Addressed
Appointments to the UKRI Board are made on personal experience and skill set via open competition. Appointees are not recruited to represent any constituency, sector or regional grouping as it is essential that they operate collectively for the overall benefit of UKRI and the UK. The legal requirement for BEIS Secretaries of State to have regard to experience of research and innovation conditions in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland when appointing UKRI’s Non-Executive Directors is, however, also taken into account, alongside a range of other issues, during recruitment exercises to ensure a balanced Board. In addition to this legal requirement, it is essential that UKRI operate with an effective understanding of the diversity of the UK R&D landscape. This is achieved through regular engagement and collaboration with the Devolved Administrations and their delivery bodies (as described below) and informed by BEIS’ and Territorial Offices’ own engagement, including discussions between the Science Minister and DA counterparts. UKRI engages with people and organisations across the UK through a number of mechanisms, including regular senior-level meetings with the CEO, Dame Ottoline Leyser, UKRI Strategy Directors and individual Council Executive Chairs. These include representatives from devolved governments including the Chief Scientific Advisers, individual institutions and businesses. The UKRI Board will also be seeking to hold regular meetings outside of London and is keen to liaise closely with the Devolved Administrations in their planning. Dame Ottoline Leyser has conducted virtual visits to Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales during her first year in post. Research and Innovation stakeholders from across the UK are also engaged through groups that are convened by UKRI, for example the UKRI Science and Innovation Strategy Forum (SISF) a mechanism for senior-level engagement to ensure the strategic alignment of R&D priorities and policies between the Devolved Administrations and the UK Government, and to provide high-level strategic direction which helps to enrich the UK’s research and innovation landscape.
Source
Committee
Scottish Affairs Committee
Inquiry
Universities and Scotland
Report
First Report - Universities and Scotland
28 May 2021
HC 54
Addressee Bodies
Scotland Office
Timeline
Recommendation age
5.2 yrs
Report published
28 May 2021