2nd Report - Managing the impact of street works
Select Committee
Transport Committee
HC 522
3 July 2025
Government response
2nd Special Report - Managing the impact of street works: Government Response · published 12 Sep 2025
Recommendations & Conclusions
7 results
2
Conclusion
Deferred
Impose full overrun charges for street works leaving equipment/signs post-completion.
Conclusion
Leaving equipment or signs in place that imply to the public that street works are still ongoing when they have finished should attract a full overrun charge. (Recommendation, Paragraph 22)
Government Response Summary
The government agrees in principle that road closure signage should indicate the exact location but expresses concerns about potential safety risks. It commits to taking the recommendation away for further consideration with safety experts to balance clarity and safety.
Department for Transport
View Details
8
Conclusion
Deferred
Increase standard guarantee period for all excavations to five years and fine companies for repeat repairs.
Conclusion
The current guarantee period of two or three years for reinstatements after works, the latter being for deep excavations, is too short given that reinstatements should last more than ten years if carried out correctly. The Department should increase the …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government's response focused on monitoring the use of immediate permits and updating the Co-ordination Code of Practice for clarity, rather than addressing the recommended increase in guarantee periods for excavations or fines for remedial work.
Department for Transport
View Details
9
Conclusion
Deferred
Reinstatement defect inspection process ineffective due to weak incentives for utility companies.
Conclusion
The process whereby authorities inspect reinstatements for defects after works are complete is not working as well as it should be, with weak incentives for utility companies to fix the defects promptly, or at all, once they have been found …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government focused on the existing Street Manager platform's open data for street works and its use by third-party services, rather than addressing the problems with the inspection process for reinstatements or incentives for fixing defects.
Department for Transport
View Details
10
Recommendation
Deferred
Introduce timescales, escalating fines for faulty reinstatements, and lift the two-cycle inspection cap.
Recommendation
The Department should introduce timescales for companies to repair faulty reinstatements, with meaningfully increasing fines if they fail to do so on time. The fine should increase each time a deadline has not been met, and the company responsible should …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the need for review regarding faulty reinstatements and commits to engaging with HAUC to understand if their position on the two-cycle inspection cap has changed or if new evidence warrants revisiting it, rather than directly committing to introduce timescales, increasing fines, or lifting the cap.
Department for Transport
View Details
11
Conclusion
Deferred
Existing street works dispute resolution process inefficient, leading to resource-intensive legal disagreements.
Conclusion
The current dispute resolution process does not seem to be working well. Disagreements relating to the interpretation of street works legislation can end up as legal disputes which are resource intensive for authorities and utility companies alike. (Conclusion, Paragraph 53)
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledged issues with coordinating street works for new housing developments and committed to exploring options with MHCLG to encourage early sharing of utility connection plans, but did not address the recommendation about improving the dispute resolution process for interpreting street works legislation.
Department for Transport
View Details
12
Conclusion
Deferred
Consider establishing a Street Works Commissioner or alternative independent dispute resolution function.
Conclusion
The Department for Transport should consider setting up a Street Works Commissioner in England to help ensure the consistent application and interpretation of legislation, provide an option for independent dispute resolution and monitor performance across the sector. This would provide …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government's response focused on lane rental schemes as a tool to reduce disruption from street works and mentioned publishing results of a consultation on devolving approval powers for these schemes, completely avoiding the recommendation for a Street Works Commissioner or alternative dispute resolution body.
Department for Transport
View Details
13
Recommendation
Deferred
Consult on amending permit scheme guidance to incentivise earlier completion of street works.
Recommendation
The Department for Transport should consult on amending guidance for permit schemes so that fees incentivise completion of works earlier than the period allowed for by a permit. (Recommendation, Paragraph 57)
Government Response Summary
The government states that the current legal framework already permits authorities to offer fee discounts for early completion of works and incentivise efficient practices. It commits to engaging with highway authorities to understand how these existing powers are being used and to identify if further amendments to guidance are required, rather than directly consulting on amendments as recommended.
Department for Transport
View Details