Fourth Report - Road pricing

Select Committee
Transport Committee HC 789 4 February 2022
Report Status Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations 17 items (12 recs)
Source View on Parliament website
Government Response (AI assessment · 17 of 17 classified)
Accepted 3
Acknowledged 1
Not Addressed 11
Rejected 2
Government response
Third Special Report - Road Pricing: Government Response to the Committee’s Fourth Report of Session 2021–22 · published 6 Mar 2023
Read the government response ↗ Response on the tracker
Clear

Recommendations & Conclusions

2 results
3 Recommendation Rejected
Para 9
To promote fairness and public acceptance, any alternative road charging mechanism must (a) entirely replace...
Recommendation
To promote fairness and public acceptance, any alternative road charging mechanism must (a) entirely replace fuel duty and vehicle excise duty rather than being added alongside those taxes; and (b) be revenue neutral with most motorists paying the same or … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states it does not have further views on the committee's recommendations regarding the ways road pricing should be considered.
Department for Transport
View Details
6 Recommendation Rejected
Para 19
In designing a replacement for fuel duty and vehicle excise duty, the Government must examine...
Recommendation
In designing a replacement for fuel duty and vehicle excise duty, the Government must examine how an alternative road pricing mechanism can use price as a lever for change while subjecting motorists to fair levels of taxation. To that end, … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government does not have further views on the Committee’s recommendations for the ways in which road pricing should be considered.
Department for Transport
View Details