Fourth report: Unequal impact? Coronavirus, disability and access to services: full Report

The government response does not address the committee's comments on Mental Health Act, Care Act, or Children and Families Act provisions; instead, it discusses ensuring fair access to food in shops.

The government's response did not address the recommendation to publish an assessment of disabled people's food access needs or a plan for reviewing local support arrangements; instead, it discussed NHS health checks and mask wearing.

The government's response did not address the committee's conclusion regarding Care Act easements, instead discussing clear face masks and funding for social care, which relates to other recommendations.

The government's response did not address the committee's conclusion regarding discriminatory practices in DNARs and critical care guidelines, instead discussing social care funding.

The government's response did not address the recommendation for it to consent to a statutory Code of Practice on the Public Sector Equality Duty, instead focusing on social care funding.

The government response does not address the recommendation about setting targets for the reintroduction of annual health checks for people with learning disabilities, instead discussing a new plan for education for children with special educational needs.

The government's response discusses funding for special educational needs and disability (SEND) education, not addressing the recommendation regarding clear facemasks or the request for updates on their distribution and assessment of need.

The government's response discusses optional training for Ministers on communicating with disabled people, completely failing to address the recommendation for a comprehensive social care reform package addressing funding, workforce issues, and integration of services.

The government's response highlights its efforts to provide accessible information about Coronavirus and collaborate with disability organizations, but it does not address the committee's points on the Secretary of State's powers or guidance regarding children and young people's SEND needs.

The government's response discusses British Sign Language provision in the House of Commons, completely failing to address the recommendation on prioritizing and publishing the SEND review.

The government's response discusses the Equality Hub's work on making coronavirus information accessible, completely failing to address the recommendation for increased and ring-fenced catch-up funding for pupils with SEND or an additional strand of specialist provision.