19
We are disappointed that the Minister seemed disinclined to consider specific additional support to pre-pensioners.
Recommendation
We are disappointed that the Minister seemed disinclined to consider specific additional support to pre-pensioners. We are also disappointed at the lack of evidence-based policy-making that has been driving this and policy making more generally in the DWP. We recommend that the government think again and, as a minimum, consult on the proposal for an uplift in the level of UC in the year before State Pension age with the aim of introducing additional support by the end of 2026. As part of this, it should: explain how it thinks conditionality rules should apply in the year before SPA; and produce its own assessment of the impact and overall costs. (Recommendation, Paragraph 91)
Source
Committee
Work and Pensions Committee
Inquiry
Transition to State Pension age
Report
2nd Report - Transition to State Pension Age
11 Jul 2026
HC 76
Addressee Bodies
Department for Work and Pensions
Timeline
Report published
11 Jul 2026