Government services: Identifying costs and generating income
Public Accounts Committee
Open
Inquiry
Opened: 6 May 2025
Parliament page
The Committee (PAC) is holding an inquiry to look at government’s management of fees and charges to recover the costs of providing services and how government is identifying costs to sustainably improve productivity. Improved productivity is key to the government’s aims to improve the affordability of public services. Government’s roadmap …
Read more
29
Recommendations
17
Conclusions
2
Reports
2
Oral sessions
9
Letters
2
Events
Activity timeline 17 events
27 Apr
2026
2026
27 Apr
2026
2026
27 Apr
2026
2026
1 Apr
2026
2026
1 Apr
2026
2026
12 Mar
2026
2026
12 Dec
2025
2025
Report published
10 Dec
2025
2025
Report published
1 Dec
2025
2025
1 Dec
2025
2025
13 Nov
2025
2025
Oral evidence sessions 2 sessions
20 Oct 2025
View on parliament.uk
Andrew Cartner · HM Treasury
Bonnie Wang · DSIT
Cat Little CB · Cabinet Office
Conrad Smewing · HM Treasury
16 Oct 2025
View on parliament.uk
Farhad Chikhalia · Ministry of Justice
James Bowler CB · HM Treasury
Matthew Taylor · HM Treasury
Nick Donlevy · HM Treasury
Tim Moss CBE · Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
Reports 2 reports · click to expand
| Title | HC No. | Published | Items | Response |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58th Report - Government services: Identifying costs | HC 1421 | 12 Dec 2025 | 21 | Responded |
| 57th Report - Government services: Generating income | HC 890 | 10 Dec 2025 | 25 | Responded |
Recommendations & Conclusions
5 results
2
Recommendation
Rejected
57th Report - Government services:…
Introduce an annual review cycle and targeted deep-dives for charged services missing cost recovery targets.
The Treasury has been too passive in its oversight of fees and charges resulting in large surpluses and deficits which unfairly impacts taxpayers and potentially future service users. The Treasury’s current oversight of fees and charges is through its spending …
Read more
Government Response
The government disagrees with the recommendation, rejecting an annual review cycle and targeted deep-dives. Instead, it will update the Financial Reporting Manual (FReM) with clearer guidance and embed oversight through bi-annual Spending Review returns.
HM Treasury
View details
5
Recommendation
Rejected
57th Report - Government services:…
Publish a plan to embed efficiency incentives within the fee-setting framework to reward productivity improvements.
The Treasury’s system for fees and charges has failed to incentivise cost reduction or productivity improvements, leading to missed opportunities to improve services. Where charged services aim to recover all costs, any potential savings would be passed on to the …
Read more
Government Response
The government rejects the recommendation, stating its existing Government Efficiency Framework and Spending Review targets already provide adequate incentives for departments to drive efficiencies in fee-funded services and track performance.
HM Treasury
View details
22
Recommendation
Rejected
57th Report - Government services:…
Cost-recovery models offer little incentive for departments to achieve efficiencies or innovate.
Most services are designed to recover their costs, meaning any efficiencies achieved would be passed onto fee-payers rather than retained by the department. Conversely rising costs can simply be transferred to users without challenge.45 The NAO highlighted the challenges of …
Read more
Government Response
The government disagrees with the recommendation but states that the Government Efficiency Framework (GEF) already provides extensive guidance for efficiency in the fee-setting framework. They state that departments are incentivised to drive efficiencies in their fee-funded services as this will count towards their bespoke technical efficiency targets agreed at the 2025 Spending Review.
HM Treasury
View details
23
Recommendation
Rejected
57th Report - Government services:…
Departments struggle to identify efficiencies due to inconsistent cost-modelling and insufficient data.
Departments and arm’s-length bodies struggle to identify opportunities to improve efficiency and value for money as they do not maintain detailed cost information. The NAO found charging bodies use different methods to calculate costs including a range of cost models …
Read more
Government Response
The government disagrees with the recommendation but states that the Government Efficiency Framework (GEF) already provides extensive guidance for efficiency in the fee-setting framework. They state that departments are incentivised to drive efficiencies in their fee-funded services as this will count towards their bespoke technical efficiency targets agreed at the 2025 Spending Review.
HM Treasury
View details
24
Conclusion
Rejected
57th Report - Government services:…
DVLA and MoJ demonstrate successful efficiency gains through digitisation and process redesign.
We heard evidence that some organisations have demonstrated how efficiencies can be achieved. The DVLA told us it has held its fees at 2014 levels by absorbing inflation through digitisation and process redesign, while improving customer service.52 It operates under …
Read more
Government Response
The government disagrees with the recommendation but states that the Government Efficiency Framework (GEF) already provides guidance for efficiency and that departments are incentivized to drive efficiencies in their fee-funded services, which will count towards their technical efficiency targets.
HM Treasury
View details
Government Response AI assessment · 46 of 29 classified
Accepted
19
Acknowledged
10
Deferred
1
Rejected
5
Total
29 recs + 17 conclusions
Correspondence 9 letters
27 Apr 2026
From committee
Letter to the Permanent Secretary to HM Treasury relating to Treasure Minute response - Government Services identifying costs, 27 April 2026
Parliament page
27 Apr 2026
To committee
Letter from the Permanent Secretary to the Department of Science, Innovation and Technology relating to Treasury Minute response - Government Services: Identifying costs
Parliament page
27 Apr 2026
From committee
Letter to the Permanent Secretary to HM Treasury relating to Treasury Minute response - Government Services: generating income, 27 April 2026
Parliament page
12 Mar 2026
To committee
Letter from the Permanent Secretary at the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology relating to recommendation 3a of the Committee’s Fifty-eighth Report on Government services: Identifying costs, 23 February 2026
Parliament page
1 Dec 2025
To committee
Letter from the Permanent Secretary at HM Treasury relating to the Committee’s evidence session on Identifying costs and generating income on 20 October 2025 along with the draft checklist for fees and charges, 24 November 2025
Parliament page
1 Dec 2025
To committee
Letter from the Chief Executive of the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency relating to the Committee’s evidence session on Government Services: Identifying Costs and Generating Income on 16 October, 24 November 2025
Parliament page
13 Nov 2025
To committee
Letter from the Permanent Secretary of the Cabinet Office to the Chair relating to the Committee’s inquiry into Identifying costs: Government Services, 04 November 2025
Parliament page
13 Nov 2025
To committee
Letter from the Director for Digital Strategy and Assurance of the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology relating to an Update on Chief Digital Information Posts 2025 following up from the Committee sessions on 16 and 20 October, 04 November 2025
Parliament page
3 Nov 2025
From committee
Letter to the Chair relating to Committee hearing: Identifying costs and generating income, 24 October 2025
Parliament page