22

In proposing to replace the Sponsor Body, the Commission did not set out what options...

Conclusion
In proposing to replace the Sponsor Body, the Commission did not set out what options were considered for the revised governance and how they differed from existing arrangements.54 The Sponsor Body told us that it has not been involved in all the conversations that led to the Commission’s proposals.55 We heard how work on what a replacement client function could look like, beyond a tentative paper, was set up after the proposal.56 The Sponsor Body told us it did not know the Commission’s reason for proposing its dissolution.57 The Clerk of the House told us that this reasoning will be set out in a report prior to the tabling of the indicative resolutions to the Houses.58
Government Response

A response document is linked to this report, dated 2 September 2022. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document.

Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age 4.2 yrs
Report published 29 Jun 2022