23
Acknowledged
In June 2022, the independent review panel recommended that bringing the sponsor function in-house should...
Conclusion
In June 2022, the independent review panel recommended that bringing the sponsor function in-house should be viewed as a pragmatic measure – the sponsor body governance model could be made to work but was unlikely to be viable given the “extent of lost confidence and momentum for bringing the sponsor function in-house…attempting to retaining the current model is unlikely to be viable”. Looking ahead, the expert panel recommended that “The governance model for the delivery phase will need to be separately considered and confirmed after the R&R scope and preferred delivery strategy is agreed”.59
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the Panel's conclusion that the governance model for the delivery phase will need to be separately considered and confirmed after the scope and preferred delivery strategy is agreed, stating that governance structures will be considered in the development of the strategic case.
Government Response
Acknowledged
Government Response
Acknowledged
HM Government
Acknowledged
The Panel concluded that the governance model for the delivery phase will need to be separately considered and confirmed after the scope and preferred delivery strategy is agreed. In line with HMT Green Book processes, governance structures will be considered in the development of the strategic case, to be decided on by the two Houses.
Source
Committee
Public Accounts Committee
Report
Tenth Report - Restoration and Renewal of Parliament
29 Jun 2022
HC 49
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age
3.9 yrs
Report published
29 Jun 2022