24 Accepted

The Clerk of the House told us that he expected the Infrastructure and Projects Authority...

Conclusion
The Clerk of the House told us that he expected the Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) to assure the arrangements but recognised that the IPA had no formal role over the Programme.60 Following our March evidence session, the Clerk clarified that the IPA will not be providing assurance over the proposed governance and approach to the works. Instead, in response to the Commissions’ request for independent advice in March 2022, a panel of “independent experts with experience of major infrastructure projects” has been established to provide assurance over both the new governance arrangements and the approach to the works.61 The Clerk of the House told us he was confident a report would be ready for the Joint Commission in the middle of June.62 The joint report was considered by the Commissions on 13 June 2022 and published on 14 June.63 52 HC1100 Qq 9–10 53 HC49 Q2 54 House of Commons Commission, Decisions, 1 February 2022 55 HC1100 Q 45 56 HC1100 Qq 85–87 57 HC1100 Q 119 58 HC1100 Qq 98, 102; HC49 Q 78 59 Joint report from the House of Commons and House of Lords Commissions, 14 June 2022, pg 23 60 HC1100 Qq 70–74; C&AG’s Report, para 2.6 61 Letter from Dr John Benger, 29 March 2022; HC49 Qq 77–78 62 HC49 Q 91 63 Joint report from the House of Commons and House of Lords Commissions, 14 June 2022 16 Restoration and Renewal of Parliament 2 Approach to the Programme works Deciding the approach
Government Response Summary
The Clerks broadly agree with the committee's observations and commit to ensuring future Independent Advice and Assurance Panels will continue to consist of independent experts, and that their outcomes will be published subject to Commission agreement.
Government Response
Accepted
HM Government Accepted
The Clerk of the House and the Clerk of the Parliaments broadly agree with the Committee’s recommendation Target implementation: not applicable, as this recommendation is ongoing. The Clerk of the House and the Clerk of the Parliaments are very aware of the importance of their roles as Accounting Officers and the importance of ensuring value for money and efficient and effective use of taxpayers’ money. The letter referred to in the PAC report concerns House of Commons procedure: where the Speaker of the House of Commons takes a decision which the Clerk of the House feels “comprises a substantial breach of the Standing Orders or a departure from long-established conventions without appropriate authorisation by the House itself”, the Clerk may place a note expressing this view in the Library of the House. This relates to the procedural and constitutional advice the Clerk of the House gives to the Speaker of the House of Commons, as opposed to any advice the Clerk of the House gives in his role as Accounting Officer or Corporate Officer. There is no such protocol in the House of Lords. There is no equivalent mechanism currently for advice provided by the Clerk of the House to the Commission in his role of Accounting Officer or Corporate Officer to be put in the public domain, but as a non-voting member of the Commission the Clerk has a forum to ensure his views are heard and minuted. It would be for the Commissions to decide whether to publish any advice submitted to them. The Independent Advice and Assurance Panel that provided advice to the Commissions of both Houses in May 2022 was made up of four independent programme experts with no prior involvement in the decisions relating to the Restoration and Renewal Programme and no vested interests in the outcome of the Commissions’ report and recommendations. Their details are provided in Annex C of the Commissions’ report. The panel were able to speak to whomsoever they required across Parliament and the R&R statutory bodies and review any information they requested. Any future Independent Advice and Assurance Panels convened for this programme will continue to comprise of independent and objective experts. The Clerk of the House and the Clerk of the Parliaments commit to publishing the outcome of any future Independent Advice and Assurance Panels that they commission subject to the agreement of the Commissions, acting as the Client Board. Publication will be subject to the usual protocols for redacting information, if necessary, for example for security or commercial reasons.
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age 4.1 yrs
Report published 29 Jun 2022