17
Acknowledged
We queried whether making “up to” £600 million available for 2021–22 at the Spending Review...
Conclusion
We queried whether making “up to” £600 million available for 2021–22 at the Spending Review 2020 had set an expectation about the amount that would be awarded in the first year.51 The Department explained that this £600 million was the amount it expected bidders to spend in the first year of funding and not an indication of how much it intended to award in the first round. When asked how much it had paid out this year, the Department estimated that it had so far paid out around £100 million.52 Given it was only four weeks to the year end when we took evidence, that the Department had required bidders to be able to spend some funding in the 2021–22 financial year as part of the pass/ fail criteria, and it expected bidders to spend £600 million in the year, we would have expected this £100 million figure to be much higher.53
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the committee's observation, explaining that the initial £600 million for the Levelling Up Fund was an early planning assumption, updated to £200 million at SR21, and actual spend was £128 million due to various economic factors. It provides a spending profile for Round 1 but commits to no new specific actions.
Government Response
Acknowledged
Government Response
Acknowledged
HM Government
Acknowledged
The government agrees with the Committee’s recommendation. Recommendation implemented The Levelling Up Fund is a new funding programme, and the accountable departments – the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities and Department for Transport (DfT) – understand it is important to have robust process in place. The £600 million referred to came from an early planning assumption on what the department expected to spend and was updated at Spending Review 2021 which saw £0.2 billion of spend agreed for 2021-22. The Prospectus for the first round was clear that projects which are able to demonstrate investment or begin delivery on the ground in 2021-22 financial year would be prioritised. As such, bids were required to be able to defray some funding in 2021-22. To safeguard value for money and ensure deliverability, a robust assessment (as per the published framework) was carried out over the summer following the receipt of applications in June 2021. Deliverability formed 25% of the assessment framework, and each bid was reviewed by trained assessors to identify the best quality and most deliverable projects. Following the autumn 2021 Spending Review announcement, the accountable departments have worked with successful applicants to ensure that the necessary baselining was conducted and that places were prepared for delivery. Following this assessment and careful due diligence, funding agreements were issued in February with payments made after. This robust process gives the government confidence in the overall deliverability of funded proposals. Nevertheless, the accountable departments did pay out less funding in 2021-22 (£128 million including RDEL) relative to the updated SR figure of £200 million). This reflects the economic climate which continues to shift, with many factors constraining speed of delivery, including contracting issues due to cost inflation, supply chain disruption and fear of recession. Table 1: Table showing spend for 2021-22 and the current profile of expected spend for LUF Round 1 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 (£m) (£m) (£m) (£m) (£m) CDEL 108 449 889 220 27 RDEL 20 Total 128 449 889 220 27
Source
Committee
Public Accounts Committee
Inquiry
Supporting local economic growth
Report
Fifth Report - Local economic growth
08 Jun 2022
HC 252
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age
4.1 yrs
Report published
08 Jun 2022