38
The Department noted that a large part of the additional funding that Sir Kevan had...
Conclusion
The Department noted that a large part of the additional funding that Sir Kevan had recommended had related to suggested changes to the timing of the school day, which had met with a mixed reception among schools and teachers. It had therefore decided to take more time, ahead of the Spending Review, to consider the evidence base for such a large investment. It was looking at exactly how extra time in school might be spent and what happened already within the sector.58 49 C&AG’s Report, para 1.17 50 Q 47 51 Qq 23–24 52 Qq 25, 29 53 C&AG’s Report, para 10 54 C&AG’s Report, Figure 5 55 HC Education Committee, Oral evidence: Education Recovery, HC 452, 29 June 2021, Q 10 56 Letter from Sir Kevan Collins to the Prime Minister, 2 June 2021 57 Qq 103–104 58 Qq 103–104 16 School Funding
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 14 December 2021. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document.
Source
Committee
Public Accounts Committee
Inquiry
School funding
Report
Twenty-First Report - School Funding
22 Oct 2021
HC 183
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age
4.9 yrs
Report published
22 Oct 2021