Twenty-First Report - School Funding

Select Committee
Public Accounts Committee HC 183 22 October 2021
Report Status Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations 38 items (11 recs)
Government Response (AI assessment · 34 of 38 classified)
Government response
Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Twenty-First report from Session 2021-22 · published 14 Dec 2021

Recommendations & Conclusions

38 results
2 Recommendation Not Addressed
Under the national funding formula, schools that are more deprived have fared worse than those...
Recommendation
Under the national funding formula, schools that are more deprived have fared worse than those that are less deprived. In 2018–19, the Department introduced a national funding formula with the aim of allocating school funding more transparently, consistently and fairly … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government did not address the recommendation to publish an assessment of the likely impact of moving to a hard national funding formula on individual schools before its implementation, instead reiterating that the NFF distributes funding fairly and fixes a broken system.
HM Treasury
View Details
3 Recommendation Rejected
It is not possible to tell whether individual academy schools are receiving the government’s guaranteed...
Recommendation
It is not possible to tell whether individual academy schools are receiving the government’s guaranteed minimum per-pupil funding levels. In 2018–19, the Department introduced minimum levels of schools block per-pupil funding for all schools in England. In January 2020, the … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government rejects the recommendation, stating it does not collect this information and it would not be practicable to do so. It suggests existing data on the Schools Financial Benchmarking website is sufficient for analysis.
HM Treasury
View Details
4 Recommendation Accepted
Schools are having to cross-subsidise their sixth forms with funding intended to support younger pupils.
Recommendation
Schools are having to cross-subsidise their sixth forms with funding intended to support younger pupils. Between 2014–15 and 2020–21, the balance of funding shifted from secondary schools to primary schools. Secondary school funding per pupil dropped by 3.9% in real … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government accepted the recommendation, committing to continue considering how different funding streams interact to support the financial sustainability of schools with sixth forms in future funding decisions, noting significant additional investment in 16-19 education.
HM Treasury
View Details
5 Recommendation Accepted
The Department does not seem to have a grip on the impact of falling rolls...
Recommendation
The Department does not seem to have a grip on the impact of falling rolls on schools. Most school funding follows the pupils—under the national funding formula, the Department allocates nearly three-quarters of schools block funding on the basis of … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the recommendation and commits to writing to the Committee by March 2022 with an updated assessment of support for schools with decreasing pupil numbers.
HM Treasury
View Details
6 Recommendation Accepted in Part
The Department cannot say when it will implement its commitment to a starting salary of...
Recommendation
The Department cannot say when it will implement its commitment to a starting salary of £30,000 for new teachers. In September 2019, the Government set out its intention that salaries for new teachers would rise to £30,000 by September 2022, … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees to the recommendation and will submit written evidence to the School Teachers’ Review Body (STRB) in early 2022, outlining its intended approach to delivering the £30,000 starting salary for teachers, although exact delivery remains subject to STRB recommendations.
HM Treasury
View Details
1 Conclusion Not Addressed
On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence...
Conclusion
On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence from the Department for Education (the Department) and the Education and Skills Funding Agency (the ESFA) on school funding in England.1
Government Response Summary
The government response restates the committee's initial observation about taking evidence for the report, without addressing any specific findings or recommendations.
HM Treasury
View Details
7 Conclusion Accepted
There has also been a relative re-distribution of funding from more deprived schools (those with...
Conclusion
There has also been a relative re-distribution of funding from more deprived schools (those with a higher proportion of pupils eligible for free school meals) to less deprived schools. Between 2017–18 and 2020–21, average per-pupil funding for the most deprived … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees and will publish an analysis of the impact of transitional steps towards a hard National Funding Formula on individual schools and different types of schools in July 2022, updated annually.
HM Treasury
View Details
8 Conclusion Acknowledged
The written evidence that we received raised concerns about the impact of the national funding...
Conclusion
The written evidence that we received raised concerns about the impact of the national funding formula. Professor Tanya Ovenden-Hope said that the formula had not delivered the expected significant increases in funding for small schools, including rural schools which have … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges concerns about the national funding formula (NFF) and reiterates its belief that the NFF distributes funding fairly. It further states it has published a consultation on moving to a direct, single national formula, with a gradual transition proposed from 2023-24 and annual impact analyses to be published.
HM Treasury
View Details
9 Conclusion Accepted
The Department said that the national funding formula had fixed a system that had become...
Conclusion
The Department said that the national funding formula had fixed a system that had become broken. It explained that, between 2005 and 2017–18, school funding had not been adjusted to reflect changes in pattens of need across the country. For … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agreed with the Committee's observation that the national funding formula (NFF) fixed a broken system and fairly distributes funding. It committed to publishing an analysis of the impact of its proposed transitional step towards a hard NFF in July 2022, with annual updates.
HM Treasury
View Details
10 Conclusion Accepted
The Department told us that funding allocations were now catching up with changing levels of...
Conclusion
The Department told us that funding allocations were now catching up with changing levels of deprivation—some areas remained very deprived but were not as deprived as they had been in the early 2000s, while other areas remained less deprived but … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government explains that the National Funding Formula (NFF) fairly distributes funding based on school and pupil needs, and the shifting patterns reflect the NFF catching up with changes in deprivation levels since the early 2000s.
HM Treasury
View Details
11 Recommendation Accepted
The Department also highlighted the impact of the new minimum per-pupil funding levels on the...
Recommendation
The Department also highlighted the impact of the new minimum per-pupil funding levels on the distribution of funding. The effect of these had been to shift funding in the direction of schools that had very low levels of deprivation.12 The … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the implicit recommendation to monitor funding impacts, committing to publish an annual analysis of the impact of transitional funding steps on individual and different types of schools, with the first due in July 2022.
HM Treasury
View Details
12 Conclusion
The Department provides pupil premium funding (£2.2 billion in 2020–21) to help schools improve the...
Conclusion
The Department provides pupil premium funding (£2.2 billion in 2020–21) to help schools improve the attainment of disadvantaged pupils.14 From April 2021, the Department has calculated pupil premium allocations based on the number of eligible pupils recorded by schools in … Read more
HM Treasury
View Details
13 Conclusion Rejected
In 2018–19, as part of the national funding formula, the Department introduced minimum per-pupil funding...
Conclusion
In 2018–19, as part of the national funding formula, the Department introduced minimum per-pupil funding levels for all schools in England in support of the government’s aim of ‘levelling up education funding’.17 In January 2020, the Prime Minister guaranteed that … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government disagreed with an implicit recommendation to collect information on minimum per-pupil funding levels from academy trusts, stating it does not collect such data and it would not be practicable. It instead pointed to the Schools Financial Benchmarking website as the best source for analysing academy expenditure.
HM Treasury
View Details
14 Conclusion Rejected
Local authorities can apply local funding formulae in deciding funding for maintained schools and academy...
Conclusion
Local authorities can apply local funding formulae in deciding funding for maintained schools and academy trusts. However, the Department limited the extent of local authorities’ discretion from 2020–21 by requiring them to include the minimum per- pupil funding levels in … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government disagreed with an implicit recommendation regarding multi-academy trust funding distribution, stating it does not collect information on how trusts provide minimum per-pupil funding to their schools, and it would not be practicable. It advised using the Schools Financial Benchmarking website for expenditure analysis.
HM Treasury
View Details
15 Conclusion Rejected
We asked why multi-academy trusts had more freedom in how they distributed funding.
Conclusion
We asked why multi-academy trusts had more freedom in how they distributed funding. The Department replied that academy trusts and local authorities had different roles: local authorities were responsible for distributing funding between schools, whereas academy trusts had direct responsibility … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government disagreed with an implicit recommendation regarding multi-academy trust funding freedoms, stating it does not collect information on how trusts distribute funding to their schools in this form, and it would not be practicable. It advised using the Schools Financial Benchmarking website for expenditure analysis.
HM Treasury
View Details
16 Recommendation Rejected
We asked how the parent of a child in an academy school could establish whether...
Recommendation
We asked how the parent of a child in an academy school could establish whether the school was receiving the minimum per-pupil funding levels that they were promised. The ESFA said that the most accessible source of information was the … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government rejects the recommendation to publish specific per-pupil funding details for academy schools, stating it is not practicable to collect this information but will continue to review the Schools Financial Benchmarking website for transparency.
HM Treasury
View Details
17 Conclusion Acknowledged
Overall, between 2014–15 and 2020–21, the balance of funding shifted from secondary schools to primary...
Conclusion
Overall, between 2014–15 and 2020–21, the balance of funding shifted from secondary schools to primary schools. Secondary school funding per pupil fell by 3.9% in real terms, while primary school funding increased by 4.2%. The main cause of this shift … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the committee's observation, stating its commitment to investing in 16-19 education, including school sixth forms, with an additional £1.6 billion by 2024-25, and will continue to consider how funding streams interact to support financial sustainability.
HM Treasury
View Details
18 Conclusion Acknowledged
The Department said that it had looked carefully at the balance between funding for primary...
Conclusion
The Department said that it had looked carefully at the balance between funding for primary and secondary schools when it had designed the national funding formula.26 We asked whether school sixth forms were losing out in an attempt to prop … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges concerns about cross-subsidy and commits to continued investment in 16-19 education, noting additional funding made available. It states that the department will continue to consider how different funding streams interact to support the financial sustainability of schools with sixth forms.
HM Treasury
View Details
19 Recommendation Accepted
The Department told us that it was mindful of the challenges facing 16-to-19 education, including...
Recommendation
The Department told us that it was mindful of the challenges facing 16-to-19 education, including significant demographic pressures.28 It recognised that some schools with sixth forms were cross-subsidising their post-16 provision from the rest of their budgets, and said that … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the recommendation and commits to explicitly considering how different funding streams interact in future funding decisions for 5-16 and post-16 provision, aiming to support the financial sustainability of schools with sixth forms.
HM Treasury
View Details
20 Conclusion Acknowledged
The funding that schools receive is largely determined by how many pupils they have.
Conclusion
The funding that schools receive is largely determined by how many pupils they have. Under the national funding formula, the Department allocates 73.5% of schools block funding based on pupil numbers. A further 17.9% of funding relates to the number … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the committee's observation on funding allocation and states it has published a consultation on moving to a direct, single national funding formula. It proposes a gradual transition from 2023-24 and will publish an annual analysis of its impact, with the first due in July 2022.
HM Treasury
View Details
21 Recommendation Accepted
We have heard concerns about the funding of schools, across London and elsewhere, whose rolls...
Recommendation
We have heard concerns about the funding of schools, across London and elsewhere, whose rolls are falling. Small schools, such as those with a single-form entry, may face a disproportionate financial impact if their pupil numbers fall. The Department recognised … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees to the recommendation to carry out an evidence-based assessment of support for schools with falling rolls and will provide an update to the Committee by March 2022.
HM Treasury
View Details
22 Conclusion Accepted
The Department emphasised that all schools receive a single lump sum regardless of size to...
Conclusion
The Department emphasised that all schools receive a single lump sum regardless of size to cover some of the fixed costs that do not vary with pupil numbers. In addition, 25 C&AG’s report, para 1.12 26 Q 32 27 Q … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government explained that existing National Funding Formula elements support schools with falling rolls, and local authorities are responsible for managing school places efficiently, with discretion to use Dedicated School Grant funds for this purpose. The department will provide an updated assessment of support for schools with decreasing pupil numbers by March 2022.
HM Treasury
View Details
23 Conclusion Not Addressed
We asked whether the Department was confident that the falling rolls fund had sufficient resources...
Conclusion
We asked whether the Department was confident that the falling rolls fund had sufficient resources to help all the schools that might need support. The Department replied that there were mechanisms for the funding to vary according to local need … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government response describes how local authorities may use falling rolls funds under existing policy, but does not address the committee's specific concern about the Department's confidence in the fund's sufficiency or the adequacy of support.
HM Treasury
View Details
24 Recommendation Deferred
In September 2019, the Department announced a review of the support system for children with...
Recommendation
In September 2019, the Department announced a review of the support system for children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). The review aimed to improve services for families who needed support, equip staff to respond effectively to children’s additional … Read more
Government Response Summary
The Department for Education has provided an update on the progress of the Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) review and plans to publish proposals for full public consultation, rather than immediately completing and publishing the review itself.
HM Treasury
View Details
25 Conclusion Deferred
In March 2021, the Department told us that it planned to publish a Green Paper...
Conclusion
In March 2021, the Department told us that it planned to publish a Green Paper towards the end of June 2021 with its proposals for improving SEND support.36 Consulting on proposals for change will be only the first step towards … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the issues around SEND support and funding, stating it has provided an update on the SEND review and plans to publish proposals for full public consultation to improve outcomes and value for money in the system.
HM Treasury
View Details
26 Conclusion Deferred
In July 2021, the Department wrote to tell us that it had decided it should...
Conclusion
In July 2021, the Department wrote to tell us that it had decided it should take more time to ensure its reform plans could deliver the systemic change needed, noting that the COVID-19 pandemic had materially altered the context for … Read more
Government Response Summary
The Department outlined progress on the Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) review, confirming plans to publish proposals for a full public consultation, which will involve future input from stakeholders.
HM Treasury
View Details
27 Conclusion Deferred
The Department recognised that the review process was taking much longer than it had wanted,...
Conclusion
The Department recognised that the review process was taking much longer than it had wanted, but explained that, as it had started to test its emerging proposals, the risk had become clear that the review would not be as effective … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the ongoing SEND review and states it has provided an update on progress and plans for publication, committing to publish proposals for full public consultation to shape how the department meets its goals for SEND.
HM Treasury
View Details
28 Conclusion Deferred
The Department highlighted three key things that it was doing while it worked on the...
Conclusion
The Department highlighted three key things that it was doing while it worked on the SEND review. First, it had increased high-needs funding by about £1.5 billion in two years and made available £300 million of capital funding in 2021 … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states it has provided an update on the SEND review and plans to publish proposals for full public consultation, committing to improving outcomes and value for money in the SEND system.
HM Treasury
View Details
29 Conclusion Deferred
We pressed the Department on the projected timeframe for the review to be completed, asking...
Conclusion
We pressed the Department on the projected timeframe for the review to be completed, asking if it might be autumn 2021, the end of the calendar year, or the end of the 2021–22 financial year. The Department would not commit … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the ongoing SEND review, stating it has provided an update on progress and plans to publish proposals for full public consultation, without committing to a specific completion date for the review.
HM Treasury
View Details
30 Conclusion Accepted
The school funding system currently involves local discretion in that local authorities and academy trusts...
Conclusion
The school funding system currently involves local discretion in that local authorities and academy trusts are free to vary the allocations that the Department calculates using the national funding formula. The government has said that it intends to move to … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges its intention to move to a 'hard' national funding formula, stating it has recently published a consultation on completing reforms to the NFF, proposing direct funding allocation based on a single national formula.
HM Treasury
View Details
31 Conclusion Acknowledged
The Department explained that it had begun a consultation process about moving to a hard...
Conclusion
The Department explained that it had begun a consultation process about moving to a hard funding formula on 8 July 2021. Ultimately, its goal was to allocate funding consistently across the system as whole, so that schools with the same … Read more
Government Response Summary
The Department noted it has recently published a consultation document, 'Completing our Reforms to the NFF', which proposes moving to a direct funding allocation for schools based on a national formula.
HM Treasury
View Details
32 Conclusion Deferred
In September 2019, the Government set out its intention that salaries for new teachers would...
Conclusion
In September 2019, the Government set out its intention that salaries for new teachers would rise to £30,000 nationally by September 2022. It stated that this increase would make teacher pay among the most competitive in the graduate labour market.46 … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the commitment to a £30,000 starting salary for teachers, stating it will provide written evidence to the School Teachers’ Review Body (STRB) in early 2022 outlining its intended approach, though exact delivery remains subject to STRB recommendations and government response.
HM Treasury
View Details
33 Conclusion Deferred
In its written evidence, the National Association of Head Teachers emphasised the need to improve...
Conclusion
In its written evidence, the National Association of Head Teachers emphasised the need to improve salaries for teachers and school leaders as a critical element of any strategy to resolve the “longstanding recruitment and retention crisis”. It said that schools … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states it will provide written evidence to the School Teachers’ Review Body (STRB) in early 2022, outlining its intended approach for delivering the £30,000 starting salary for teachers. However, the exact delivery is subject to the STRB's recommendations and the government's response.
HM Treasury
View Details
34 Recommendation Deferred
In the three years from 2018–19, the Department gave grants towards teacher pay increases, and...
Recommendation
In the three years from 2018–19, the Department gave grants towards teacher pay increases, and to meet the full cost of increased pension contributions. From 2021–22, the Department will incorporate most of this additional funding within the dedicated schools grant … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the recommendation and will submit written evidence to the School Teachers’ Review Body (STRB) in early 2022, outlining its intended approach to delivering the £30,000 starting salary. However, the exact delivery remains subject to STRB recommendations and the government's response.
HM Treasury
View Details
35 Conclusion Accepted
The Department said that it remained committed to the £30,000 starting salary for teachers.
Conclusion
The Department said that it remained committed to the £30,000 starting salary for teachers. It explained that it had had to adjust the rate of progress towards this based on conversations with HM Treasury and on the wider context. It … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agreed with the Committee's observation regarding its commitment to a £30,000 starting salary for teachers. It committed to providing written evidence to the School Teachers’ Review Body in early 2022, outlining its intended approach to delivering this commitment, subject to STRB recommendations.
HM Treasury
View Details
36 Conclusion
The Department plans to provide funding of £3.1 billion between 2020–21 and 2024–25 to help...
Conclusion
The Department plans to provide funding of £3.1 billion between 2020–21 and 2024–25 to help children and young people catch up on learning lost during the period of disrupted schooling caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.53 Most of the money is … Read more
HM Treasury
View Details
37 Conclusion
Sir Kevan resigned as the Education Recovery Commissioner in June 2021.
Conclusion
Sir Kevan resigned as the Education Recovery Commissioner in June 2021. In his resignation letter, he said that he did “not believe it is credible that a successful recovery can be achieved with a programme of support this size”.56 The … Read more
HM Treasury
View Details
38 Conclusion
The Department noted that a large part of the additional funding that Sir Kevan had...
Conclusion
The Department noted that a large part of the additional funding that Sir Kevan had recommended had related to suggested changes to the timing of the school day, which had met with a mixed reception among schools and teachers. It … Read more
HM Treasury
View Details