16
We raised concerns that departments were often unable to respond to parliamentary questions because they...
Conclusion
We raised concerns that departments were often unable to respond to parliamentary questions because they did not hold information at the level of granularity requested.32 The NAO identified several examples where data was not routinely collected or available, including the number of people who had absconded from the asylum system and the level of repeated appeals.33 When asked about these gaps, the Home Office said the challenge lies in “joining that data up between different systems and managing it through time”, noting that individuals move between parts of the Home Office systems, other systems, and in and out of contact. The MoJ said this join-up of data systems was “not an overnight fix”, but that it is working towards integration with the Home Office, by spring 2026, to support the introduction of a 24-week statutory timeframe to determine asylum appeals by those receiving asylum accommodation support or non-detained foreign national offenders.34 31 C&AG’s Report, para 2.21-2.24 32 Q 7 33 C&AG’s Report, para 2.24 34 Qq 73, 82, 88 14
Source
Committee
Public Accounts Committee
Inquiry
An analysis of the asylum system
Report
1st Report - An analysis of the asylum system
05 Jun 2026
HC 89
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age
0.1 yrs
Report published
05 Jun 2026