13

We challenged Homes England on how it ensures transparency and consistency in its method.

Conclusion
We challenged Homes England on how it ensures transparency and consistency in its method. It confirmed its method is evaluated and checked internally and suggested the NAO could review it as well.30 We expect the Department and Homes England to include timely and robust review of the methodology for tracking the number of homes built on land unlocked by legacy programmes, including making use of external expertise, to ensure robust challenge and improve decision-making. Homes England noted in most cases it is quite clear which homes to attribute to its investment such as Beaulieu Station in Essex where 23 C&AG’s Report Figure 3. The legacy programmes covered by the NAO report were: Housing Infrastructure Fund; Home Building Fund – Long Term Fund; Land Release Fund; Land Assembly Fund; Brownfield Land Release Fund; Brownfield, Infrastructure and Land Fund; Home Building Fund – Infrastructure Loans. 24 Letter from MHCLG, 19 May 2026; C&AG’s Report Para 11 25 Q 2 26 Q 3 27 Q 3; Geospatial imaging is using map-based images of the Earth to see, measure, and verify what’s happening in a specific place. 28 Qq 51 and 54 29 Qq 3 and 51 30 Qq 4 and 54-55 10 the local authority said no homes could be built without the infrastructure.31 It told us the alternative to using geospatial imaging was to make reporting of homes contractual but explained it did not want to put the extra burden on developers.32 31 Q 54 32 Q 4 11 2 Delivering the National Housing Delivery Fund (NHDF) Planning for local government reorganisation
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Report published 17 Jul 2026