24
AI governance fragmented across government, but recent departmental transfers consolidate responsibility.
Conclusion
At the time of the NAO report, responsibility for AI in government was split across the Cabinet Office—which was primarily responsible for AI adoption in the public sector, through CDDO, i.AI and the Government Digital Service (GDS)—and DSIT, which held responsibility for wider AI policy. The NAO concluded that limited integration of governance between these respective programmes increased risks to delivery and to the benefits of a coordinated approach.60 The NAO also reported that the then–draft strategy for public sector AI adoption did not set out which department had overall ownership and accountability for it.61 Following the general election in July 2024, the government announced that CDDO, i.AI and GDS would transfer to DSIT with the aim of uniting efforts on the digital transformation of government in one department.62 As part of these changes, DSIT has established a new Government Digital Service to bring together the previously separate functions, which will be led by a second Permanent Secretary–level Government Chief Digital Officer.63
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 10 July 2025. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document.
Source
Committee
Public Accounts Committee
Inquiry
Use of AI in Government
Report
18th Report - Use of AI in Government
26 Mar 2025
HC 356
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age
1.5 yrs
Report published
26 Mar 2025