25
Departmental moves aim to resolve AI accountability issues, but full impact unproven.
Recommendation
We questioned the departments on what benefits we would see from these departmental moves, and the Cabinet Office told us that the aim was, in part, to address the issues of accountability and complexity highlighted by the NAO report which it felt the changes had pretty comprehensively addressed.64 DSIT also explained how the changes were intended to bring together and align work on AI policy across the wider economy and AI adoption in the public sector (for example, by supporting the AI supplier market through public procurement, and setting public sector standards that can be adopted by the private sector on a voluntary basis).65 It is early days and we will be looking for more evidence that these changes will address the NAO’s concerns around complexity and accountability fully. 57 Q 8 58 Q 8 59 DSIT, A blueprint for modern digital government, January 2025, p 20 60 C&AG’s Report, para 10 and Figure 2 61 C&AG’s Report, para 9 62 DSIT press release, DSIT bolstered to better serve the British public through science and technology, 8 July 2024 63 Qq 1–2 64 Q 2 65 Qq 1–2, 4 17
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 10 July 2025. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document.
Source
Committee
Public Accounts Committee
Inquiry
Use of AI in Government
Report
18th Report - Use of AI in Government
26 Mar 2025
HC 356
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age
1.5 yrs
Report published
26 Mar 2025