32
Insurance premiums will remain high without full property protection alongside life safety.
Conclusion
In written evidence, the ABI called on government to adopt an approach that priorities property protection and building resilience alongside risk to life. It said that without a standard requiring the removal of combustible material in external walls (insulation and cladding), the risk of significant fire spread would remain after remediation and there would be a limited impact on insurance premiums. MHCLG told us that there was a balance to be struck between paying for remediation that removes all risk or taking a proportionate approach around the right amount of work to do.55 51 Q 50; C&AG’s Report para 2.20 52 Qq 19, 50–51; MHCLG Remediation Acceleration Plan 53 Q 51; RDC0138 Written evidence submitted by the Association of British Insurers, 4 February 2025 54 C&AG’s Report, para 1.11 55 Q 52; RDC0138, Written evidence submitted by the Association of British Insurers, 4 February 2025 21 3 Ensuring value for money Managing uncertain costs and timescales
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 16 May 2025. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document.
Source
Committee
Public Accounts Committee
Report
17th Report - The Remediation of Dangerous Cladding
21 Mar 2025
HC 362
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age
1.5 yrs
Report published
21 Mar 2025