22nd Report - Government’s support for biomass

Select Committee

Public Accounts Committee HC 715 25 April 2025

Report Status Government responded

Conclusions & Recommendations 25 items (2 recs)

Source View on Parliament website

Government Response (AI assessment · 25 of 25 classified)

Accepted 11

Acknowledged 6

Deferred 4

Rejected 4

Government response

Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Twenty-second report from Session 2024-25 · published 10 Jul 2025

Read the government response ↗ Response on the tracker

Recommendations & Conclusions

4 results

2 Recommendation Deferred

Estimate cost and test effectiveness of monitoring increased biomass sustainability and Drax's sourcing.

Recommendation

DESNZ has not made clear how its plans to strengthen the sustainability rules might work in practice. In its Biomass Strategy, published in August 2023, DESNZ committed to develop and consult on a common sustainability framework which could be applied … Read more DESNZ has not made clear how its plans to strengthen the sustainability rules might work in practice. In its Biomass Strategy, published in August 2023, DESNZ committed to develop and consult on a common sustainability framework which could be applied to new future biomass policies and schemes across different sectors of the economy. It also committed to considering whether it should introduce a requirement that, to meet the standards for the land criteria, 100% of woody biomass should be sustainable rather than the current 70%. DESNZ acknowledges that a new approach to assurance is needed and that increasing the stringency of rules around sustainability may need an increase in resources to monitor compliance. Ofgem’s investigation into Drax, together with the detailed follow up work, indicates the level of resources which may be required to provide a higher level of assurance. Ofgem’s ability to provide assurance 4 over higher standards of sustainability will depend on increases in financial support from DESNZ and HM Treasury. Given the significant public concerns raised in relation to the findings of the KPMG review commissioned by Drax into its Canadian supply chain processes and reporting practices, from the forests of Western Canada to the power station in North Yorkshire, the full report should be made available for Parliamentary scrutiny. recommendation a. DESNZ should estimate the cost and test the effectiveness of its proposals for monitoring compliance against an increased threshold for sustainability; b. DESNZ and HM Treasury should, working with Ofgem, consider the resource implications for Ofgem of introducing and then running a new oversight regime. DESNZ should set out, and publish, the steps it is taking to make sure it has the confidence that all the fuel burned at Drax is sustainably sourced; and c. Drax should provide the Committee with the full report as produced following the review commissioned from KPMG of its Canadian supply chain processes a Show less

Government Response Summary

The government states that providing the KPMG report (requested in point c) is not its responsibility, as the reports belong to Drax and it is up to Drax to release them. The response does not address points 'a' or 'b' of the recommendation regarding cost estimation, effectiveness testing, or resource implications for a new oversight regime.

HM Treasury

View Details

13 Conclusion Deferred

Ofgem investigation found Drax misreported data due to poor governance, resulting in redress.

Conclusion

In August 2024, Ofgem published the outcome of its investigation into Drax.30 It told us that it had reviewed over 3,000 documents as part of its investigation.31 It also reviewed a report by KPMG, commissioned by Drax, which looked at … Read more

Government Response Summary

The government states that this is not a matter for the government to consider, and it is for Drax to decide whether they wish to release the KPMG reports, adding that Ofgem has already published significant detail.

HM Treasury

View Details

23 Conclusion Deferred

BECCS considered essential for UK decarbonisation, despite reduced projected role by 2050.

Conclusion

Combining power generation using sustainably sourced biomass with carbon capture and storage (CCUS) has the potential to generate ‘negative emissions’–i.e. it could reduce the overall amount of CO2 in the atmosphere.65 Both the government and the Climate Change Committee (CCC), … Read more

Government Response Summary

The government agrees that BECCS is important and states that a forthcoming report, compliant with a High Court Order and the Climate Change Act 2008, will address policies and proposals to meet carbon budgets. They have also commissioned an Independent Review of Greenhouse Gas Removals to consider how BECCS can assist in meeting net zero targets.

HM Treasury

View Details

24 Conclusion Deferred

Initial BECCS plant target of 2030 will not be met, future support unclear.

Conclusion

The government had initially planned for BECCS plant to begin operating at scale in 2030 as part of its broader CCUS programme.68 However, as the first phase of the CCUS programme (known as Track 1) does not include a BECCS … Read more

Government Response Summary

The government acknowledges the lack of a revised target date for BECCS and states that a forthcoming report, compliant with a High Court Order and the Climate Change Act 2008, will address policies and proposals to meet carbon budgets. They have also commissioned an Independent Review of Greenhouse Gas Removals to consider how BECCS can assist in meeting net zero targets.

HM Treasury

View Details