Thirty-Sixth Report - Investigation into whistleblowing in the civil service

Select Committee
Public Accounts Committee HC 457 25 May 2024
Report Status Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations 24 items (6 recs)
Source View on Parliament website
Government Response (AI assessment · 24 of 24 classified)
Accepted 18
Accepted in Part 3
Acknowledged 3
Government response
Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Thirty-sixth report from Session 2023-24 · published 11 Jul 2025
Read the government response ↗ Response on the tracker
Clear

Recommendations & Conclusions

18 results
2 Conclusion Accepted
Set out specific actions to analyse civil service whistleblowing data for improved knowledge.
Conclusion
There is a lack of data analysis and sharing of insights regarding whistleblowing across of the civil service. The Cabinet Office does not utilise its central position to analyse the cross-government data it collects. This could help identify trends and … Read more
Government Response Summary
The Cabinet Office has already robustly analysed submitted data, categorising themes, clarifying investigation times, and exploring whistleblower experience. It will work with PSFA to explore 2024-25 data themes, look at People Survey results, and continue benchmarking annual data for year-on-year comparisons.
HM Treasury
View Details
3 Recommendation Accepted
Ensure departments build a positive environment encouraging civil service whistleblowing concerns to be raised.
Recommendation
A ‘speak up’ environment is not yet embedded throughout departments to encourage people to comfortably raise concerns. There are still negative perceptions 6 Investigation into whistleblowing in the civil service of whistleblowing which can create barriers to achieving the right … Read more
Government Response Summary
The Cabinet Office will foster best practice sharing, continue stakeholder engagement and an annual conference, and publish a learning offer. It will commission a whistleblower survey, focus the upcoming 'Speak Up' campaign on culture, and is considering a civil service-wide whistleblowing champion.
HM Treasury
View Details
4 Conclusion Accepted
Require all departments to collate feedback from whistleblowers at the end of the process.
Conclusion
The Cabinet Office and other departments do not seek feedback from whistleblowers and so are missing vital insights into the effectiveness of the process. The ‘whistleblowing heath check’ guidance from the Cabinet Office suggests departments should gather feedback from individuals … Read more
Government Response Summary
The Cabinet Office will work with departments to develop methods, including an anonymised voluntary survey, to capture whistleblower experiences, including those who report anonymously, by the end of 2024. It will also ensure senior leaders oversee victimisation claims and promote a safe-to-challenge culture.
HM Treasury
View Details
5 Conclusion Accepted
Develop a system to disseminate whistleblowing good practice across civil service and smaller bodies.
Conclusion
There is a lack of joined up thinking when it comes to sharing good practice across the civil service. There are some examples of good practice across the civil service but the Cabinet Office needs to do more to promote … Read more
Government Response Summary
The Cabinet Office will build on existing work to share best practice, explore how mature models can be shared across government, and continue working with departmental leads to ensure organisational learning. It will also explore agencies' expectations, how larger organisations can support smaller ones, and develop a mentoring system for Nominated Officers, with a target implementation by end of 2024.
HM Treasury
View Details
1 Conclusion Accepted
Committee received evidence on civil service whistleblowing from Cabinet Office and other departments.
Conclusion
On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence from the Cabinet Office, HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) and the Department for Work & Pensions (DWP) on whistleblowing in the civil service.1
Government Response Summary
The government appears to be responding to an unstated recommendation regarding data collection and analysis for 2024-25, committing to specific actions such as widening data sets, clarifying categorisation, tracking victimisation claims, commissioning data returns, and supporting practitioners.
HM Treasury
View Details
6 Recommendation Accepted
Cabinet Office introduced whistleblowing data collection and health check tools in 2017
Recommendation
In 2017, the Cabinet Office introduced data collection from departments following this Committee’s recommendations in 2016.7 The data collection process is known as the annual Raising a Concern (RAC) collection exercise, which includes a qualitative survey and a quantitative return. … Read more
Government Response Summary
The Cabinet Office will review the annual data collection for 2024-25 and widen the data set to focus on clarity and consensus on the categorisation of cases and outcomes, clarifying the time taken to conclude an investigation, requesting additional information on the experience / treatment of the whistleblower, ensuring nil responses are submitted, following up on cases which were ongoing at the time of collection, and holding departmental assurance conversations.
HM Treasury
View Details
7 Conclusion Accepted
Cabinet Office whistleblowing data has improved but lacks outcome and whistleblower perspective
Conclusion
Cabinet Office’s information on concerns and arrangements across the civil service has improved but it still has several quality limitations. For example, there is no method for capturing outcomes for concerns that are ‘ongoing’ at the point of an annual … Read more
Government Response Summary
The Cabinet Office will review the annual data collection for 2024-25, widening the data set to focus on clarity of case categorisation, time to conclude investigations, whistleblower experience, nil responses, follow up on ongoing cases and assurance conversations, targeting implementation by Spring 2025.
HM Treasury
View Details
8 Conclusion Accepted
Cabinet Office does not centrally track whistleblowing investigation lengths from departments
Conclusion
HMRC told us it understands that it is important to whistleblowers that it investigates as quickly as possible, and both HMRC and DWP monitor the length of time cases take.13 But the Cabinet Office is not collating this metric from … Read more
Government Response Summary
The Cabinet Office will review the annual data collection for 2024-25, widening the data set to focus on clarity of case categorisation, time to conclude investigations, whistleblower experience, nil responses, follow up on ongoing cases and assurance conversations, targeting implementation by Spring 2025.
HM Treasury
View Details
9 Conclusion Accepted
Central data collection fails to capture local actions from whistleblowing concerns
Conclusion
There are actions taken on a local level that are also not currently captured in the central data collection. The National Audit Office found that under 5% of completed cases in the period 2019–20 to 2021–22 are recorded as having … Read more
Government Response Summary
The Cabinet Office will review the annual data collection for 2024-25 and widen the data set to focus on clarity and consensus on the categorisation of cases and outcomes, clarifying the time taken to conclude an investigation, requesting additional information on the experience / treatment of the whistleblower, ensuring nil responses are submitted, following up on cases which were ongoing at the time of collection, and holding departmental assurance conversations.
HM Treasury
View Details
10 Conclusion Accepted
Cabinet Office lacks systematic assessment of departmental whistleblowing data quality and completeness
Conclusion
The Government People Group (within the Cabinet Office) does not systematically assess the departments’ returns for completeness or quality or to assure the adequacy of 7 HC Committee of Public Accounts, Making a whistleblowing policy work: progress update, Twenty-ninth Report … Read more
Government Response Summary
The Cabinet Office states that during the 2023-24 data collection exercise, it took robust action through regular engagement with practitioners to ensure data accuracy, further bolstered by clarifying departmental responses on behalf of agencies, and ran drop-in sessions and held assurance meetings with practitioners to support completion of annual data returns, clarify submission processes, and promote the importance of whistleblowing.
HM Treasury
View Details
11 Conclusion Accepted
Central data on fraud-related whistleblowing cases lacks seriousness and nature details
Conclusion
The National Audit Office reported that fraud accounts for around 40% of concerns raised but the central data does not indicate the seriousness of any of the types of concerns raised.22 HMRC and DWP told us that they both have … Read more
Government Response Summary
The Cabinet Office will analyse data to categorize key themes, clarify investigation times, explore whistleblower experience, ensure all responses are submitted, follow up on ongoing cases, hold assurance conversations, assess whistleblower experience, and scrutinize areas of concern, also working with the Public Sector Fraud Agency to explore any themes identified from 2024-2025 data.
HM Treasury
View Details
12 Conclusion Accepted
Inconsistent departmental health check data hinders evaluation of whistleblowing arrangements effectiveness
Conclusion
The Cabinet Office informed us that the health check data, as opposed to its annual RAC data collection, is where there is inconsistency in the data collected from departments.25 The variable data on departments whistleblowing arrangements makes it hard to … Read more
Government Response Summary
The Cabinet Office will review the annual data collection for 2024-25 and widen the data set to focus on clarity and consensus on the categorisation of cases and outcomes, clarifying the time taken to conclude an investigation, requesting additional information on the experience / treatment of the whistleblower, ensuring nil responses are submitted, following up on cases which were ongoing at the time of collection, and holding departmental assurance conversations.
HM Treasury
View Details
13 Conclusion Accepted
Only half of civil servants feel safe to challenge current practices
Conclusion
The National Audit Office found that just 52% of people ‘think it is safe to challenge the way things are done’, from their review of responses to the 2022 Civil Service People Survey. The equivalent figure for the NHS was … Read more
Government Response Summary
The Cabinet Office will foster the sharing of best practice through the online hub, continue to deliver events, develop a learning offer, promote the Speak Up campaign, commission a survey of whistleblowers, focus the Speak Up campaign on the cultural side of raising concerns, and consider introducing a civil service-wide whistleblowing champion.
HM Treasury
View Details
14 Conclusion Accepted
High anonymity rates among whistleblowers reflect ongoing trust issues in civil service
Conclusion
The Cabinet Office told us that just under half of whistleblowers come forward anonymously, acknowledging that this fact shows it has more work to do to convince people it is safe to speak up.31 We asked HMRC and DWP how … Read more
Government Response Summary
The Cabinet Office will foster the sharing of best practice through the online hub, continue to deliver events, develop a learning offer, promote the Speak Up campaign, commission a survey of whistleblowers, focus the Speak Up campaign on the cultural side of raising concerns, and consider introducing a civil service-wide whistleblowing champion.
HM Treasury
View Details
16 Conclusion Accepted
Whistleblower experience feedback not systematically collected across government departments.
Conclusion
The annual RAC data collection does not cover the treatment of whistleblowers; for example whether a whistleblower in a specific case has experienced any mistreatment, such as victimisation or bullying.39 The ‘whistleblowing heath check’ guidance issued by the Cabinet Office … Read more
Government Response Summary
The Cabinet Office will work with departmental leads to better capture whistleblowers' experiences, including victimisation or harassment, develop an anonymised feedback survey for whistleblowers, ensure senior leader oversight of victimisation cases, and share lessons learned across government.
HM Treasury
View Details
17 Conclusion Accepted
Whistleblower support predominantly relies on nominated officers and case-by-case handling.
Conclusion
We asked both HMRC and DWP how they currently support whistleblowers. HMRC told us the majority of support comes from nominated officers within the department but it also points people to other sources of advice and support, such as the … Read more
Government Response Summary
The Cabinet Office acknowledges its oversight role in civil service whistleblowing, providing a model policy, guidance, training, and data collection, while clarifying that individual departments are responsible for their specific arrangements.
HM Treasury
View Details
18 Conclusion Accepted
Systematic interviews capturing whistleblower experience are not routinely conducted by departments.
Conclusion
We asked the Cabinet Office if any interviews are undertaken with whistleblowers to capture their perspective of the experience. It told us it is not aware of interviews taking place currently. There was a hesitancy from the Cabinet Office on … Read more
Government Response Summary
The Cabinet Office will work with departmental leads to better capture whistleblowers' experiences, including whether they have experienced victimisation or harassment, develop an anonymised feedback survey for whistleblowers, ensure senior leader oversight of victimisation cases, and share lessons learned across government.
HM Treasury
View Details
19 Recommendation Accepted
Collecting systematic feedback from anonymous whistleblowers presents significant challenges for departments.
Recommendation
The Cabinet Office told us that it is considering ways of capturing feedback from people who have come forward anonymously. DWP acknowledged it finds it hard to collect information from whistleblowers who are anonymous and HMRC told us it has … Read more
Government Response Summary
The Cabinet Office will develop ways on how it can better capture whistleblowers' experiences, including whether they have experienced victimisation or harassment, an anonymised feedback survey for whistleblowers to capture their experience, and will encourage the sharing of learning and good practice across departments.
HM Treasury
View Details