Sixty-Fourth Report - The Emergency Services Network
Select Committee
Public Accounts Committee
HC 1006
14 July 2023
Government Response (AI assessment · 30 of 30 classified)
Accepted
19
Government response
Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Sixty-fourth report from Session 2022-23 · published 24 Sep 2023
Recommendations & Conclusions
5 results
8
Conclusion
Not Addressed
Home Office acknowledges £140 million wasted on Motorola due to past decisions
Conclusion
We asked whether the Department could have acted sooner to remove Motorola, and the Department acknowledged that, in hindsight, it wished different choices had been made when Motorola bought Airwave in 2016.21 The Department said it had been aware of …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees but responds by detailing current programme progress, the role of the Independent Assurance Panel (IAP) in oversight, and the competitive global market for alternative suppliers, without addressing the specific historical observations or financial estimates.
HM Treasury
View Details
11
Conclusion
Not Addressed
Emergency services disbanding dedicated ESN teams due to programme delays
Conclusion
Emergency services are temporarily disbanding their dedicated ESN teams that had been preparing for testing and transition, and the Department explained that there was currently very little for such teams to work on. It hoped each organisation would retain a …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government's response, which focuses on financial implications of the CMA ruling and business case review, does not address the committee's conclusion regarding the disbanding of emergency services' dedicated ESN teams or the importance of retaining points of contact.
HM Treasury
View Details
20
Conclusion
Not Addressed
ESN coverage remains key concern, particularly building penetration compared to Airwave
Conclusion
The coverage provided by ESN remains a key concern for emergency services.67 The NPCC was concerned that, despite commitments from the Department for ESN to be as good as Airwave, the ESN 4G signal does not penetrate buildings as successfully …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the committee's conclusion and states it has drafted an ESMCP control plan outlining main building blocks, dependencies, and testing (including real-world testing). This plan is currently out for user consultation and will be agreed upon by the end of 2023, but the response does not specifically address how building penetration issues or the 2,000-4,000 locations needing checks will be resolved.
HM Treasury
View Details
25
Conclusion
Not Addressed
ESN's expected productivity and cost benefits are unclear; commercial alternatives already adopted
Conclusion
Police were concerned that ESN may not prove any cheaper than commercial alternatives.83 We asked about operational benefits from access to data. The Department acknowledged that it no longer expected ESN to provide any productivity benefits.84 Police explained that almost …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government's response, which is identical to a response for another recommendation, does not address the committee's specific observations regarding concerns about ESN's cost, lack of productivity benefits, or the risk of emergency services not adopting it due to existing commercial alternatives.
HM Treasury
View Details
26
Conclusion
Not Addressed
ESN programme no longer expects to provide apps essential for key emergency service benefits.
Conclusion
Despite these concerns, all three emergency services did still see a continuing case for ESN. For example, the fire service said that there could be benefits from being able to share drone footage of incidents by ESN providing a common …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees on the need for clear responsibilities and plans for operating ESN when live, detailing that current contracts define the service model, the User Services supplier will act as Service Integrator, and a new billing model is developed. However, the response does not specifically address the committee's concern about the programme no longer expecting to provide apps beyond push-to-talk, which limits potential innovations and benefits.
HM Treasury
View Details