Fourteenth Report - Investigation into the British Steel Pension Scheme

Select Committee

Public Accounts Committee HC 251 21 July 2022

Report Status Government responded

Conclusions & Recommendations 23 items (5 recs)

Source View on Parliament website

Government Response (AI assessment · 23 of 23 classified)

Accepted 1

Accepted in Part 1

Acknowledged 15

Deferred 1

Not Addressed 2

Rejected 3

Government response

Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Fourteenth report from Session 2022-23 · published 14 Oct 2022

Read the government response ↗ Response on the tracker

Recommendations & Conclusions

3 results

6 Recommendation Rejected

The current compensation arrangements do not always protect consumers, can create wider costs to firms...

Recommendation

The current compensation arrangements do not always protect consumers, can create wider costs to firms and may not have the capacity to cope with future risks in the advice market. The standard approach to redress relies on consumers seeking compensation … Read more The current compensation arrangements do not always protect consumers, can create wider costs to firms and may not have the capacity to cope with future risks in the advice market. The standard approach to redress relies on consumers seeking compensation themselves, but only 25% of BSPS members who received unsuitable advice have raised claims with redress organisations. Similarly, despite the redress process being free to use, 72% of complaints to the Financial Ombudsman and 40% of claims to FSCS being made through third party representatives such as claims management companies and solicitors. This points to the general complexity of the redress system and the FCA’s failure to recognise the specific vulnerabilities of BSPS members that prevent them from seeking compensation directly. For redress arrangements to work effectively firms should have PII cover to afford the cost of compensation, however many advice firms are unable to access the insurance and, since 2018, 60% of firms have left the DB pension transfer market entirely. For firms that have entered insolvency, compensation is funded by an FSCS levy, which forces compliant firms to shoulder the cost of unsuitable advice. Given that the Financial Ombudsman is dealing with a significant backlog of complaints and the FSCS levy is forecast to increase to £406 million in 2022–23, the redress system may not have the capacity to respond to further instances of significant consumer detriment within financial services. Recommendation: The FCA, FOS and FSCS should write to the committee in 6 months to explain what they are doing to manage risks in the redress system for financial service. The FCA’s handling of the wider DB pension market should be reviewed as there could be thousands more cases of mis-selling which may be eligible 8 Investigation into the British Steel Pension Scheme for financial redress, given the significant amount of unsuitable advice seen across the sector. The review should include consideratio Show less

Government Response Summary

The FCA, FOS and FSCS will write to the committee on 21 January 2023 to explain what they are doing to manage risks in the redress system for financial service; the FCA disagrees with the recommendation to review its handling of the wider DB transfer market.

HM Treasury

View Details

13 Conclusion Rejected

Alongside the unsuitable advice provided by firms, there have been other issues of non-compliance within...

Conclusion

Alongside the unsuitable advice provided by firms, there have been other issues of non-compliance within the BSPS case, including unregulated introducers and phoenixing. The FCA has identified that in 30% of BSPS cases members were introduced to their adviser by … Read more

Government Response Summary

The government disagrees with the Committee’s recommendation but welcomes the Committee’s view on the need for effective mechanisms to consider and, where appropriate, address concerns about activity that is not within the FCA's regulatory perimeter. The government has concluded that, on balance, the key mechanisms that currently exist are appropriate to address the types of concern highlighted by the Committee.

HM Treasury

View Details

18 Conclusion Rejected

The FCA’s response to the BSPS case highlights wider issues within its regulatory approach.

Conclusion

The FCA’s response to the BSPS case highlights wider issues within its regulatory approach. Alongside the estimated 369 firms and advisers that provided unsuitable advice to BSPS members, the FCA found that 17% of DB transfer advice was unsuitable within … Read more

Government Response Summary

The FCA disagrees with the Committee’s recommendation and does not consider that a review of how it is handling the wider DB transfer market should be undertaken, stating that the harm associated with BSPS is unique and not replicated elsewhere.

HM Treasury

View Details