Seventh Report - Armoured Vehicles: the Ajax programme
Select Committee
Public Accounts Committee
HC 259
3 June 2022
Recommendations
2 results
4
Acknowledged
Nearly two years after identifying injuries to soldiers, the Department still does not know how...
Recommendation
Nearly two years after identifying injuries to soldiers, the Department still does not know how to fix the noise and vibration problems. General Dynamics must produce vehicles that are safe and has proposed modifications to reduce noise and vibration levels. …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The department is focussed on identifying the root causes of the noise and vibration issues and will provide an update on progress to the Committee at the next Ajax evidence session.
HM Treasury
View Details
6
Acknowledged
The Department’s plans for using Ajax are at risk because of uncertainty about what constitutes...
Recommendation
The Department’s plans for using Ajax are at risk because of uncertainty about what constitutes full operating capability, when this will be achieved and how Ajax vehicles will be enhanced in the future. The Department’s original in-service date, 2017, was …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the need to establish realistic dates for initial and full operating capability as quickly as feasibly possible, once a suitable technical solution to the noise and vibration issues has been agreed.
HM Treasury
View Details
Conclusions (18) Observations and findings — click to expand
1
Conclusion
Acknowledged
On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence from the Ministry of Defence (the Department) on the Ajax programme.1
Government Response Summary
The government provided background information on the Ajax programme, referring to relevant reports and reviews.
9
Conclusion
Acknowledged
Ajax’s design was based on a pre-existing vehicle, but the Department stipulated 1,200 capability requirements which meant that, in effect, it had to be developed from scratch. The Department told us that, with hindsight, having so many detailed requirements had not helped it obtain the capability it wanted in the …
Government Response Summary
The department is taking actions recommended by the NAO, has accepted recommendations made in the King Report and in the Committee report, and will consider recommendations from the Ajax Lessons Learned Review.
10
Conclusion
Acknowledged
The Department told us it had reviewed its approach so that it no longer fell into the trap of setting an excessive number of requirements. It said it now only approved programmes with a reasonable number of requirements, such as the 150 to 200 for the purchase of Boxer and …
Government Response Summary
The department states it is taking actions recommended by the NAO to improve the effectiveness of the Ajax programme, has accepted recommendations made in the King Report and in this Committee report, and that insights from the independent Ajax Lessons Learned Review will be considered.
11
Conclusion
Acknowledged
The problems on the Ajax programme were exacerbated by inadequate governance and programme management failures. The current senior responsible owner, appointed in October 2021, is the first to be full-time, although his corporate responsibilities take up about 5% of his time. The Department said that his role as head of …
Government Response Summary
The department states it is taking actions recommended by the NAO to improve the effectiveness of the Ajax programme, has accepted recommendations made in the King Report and in this Committee report, and that insights from the independent Ajax Lessons Learned Review will be considered.
12
Conclusion
Acknowledged
The Department admitted that the programme’s reset in 2018 had been disappointing, and it recognised that the revised programme schedule had been unrealistic.24 It said it had attempted to meet the planned in-service date by accepting an incremental build-up of capability, using a series of ‘capability drops’. By this arrangement, …
Government Response Summary
The department states it is taking actions recommended by the NAO to improve the effectiveness of the Ajax programme, has accepted recommendations made in the King Report and in this Committee report, and that insights from the independent Ajax Lessons Learned Review will be considered.
13
Conclusion
Acknowledged
The Department explained that for complex, technologically advanced programmes, it was usual to have a profile of upfront investment before the manufacture phase began.26 When the Department awarded the manufacture contract in 2014, it included some overlap of demonstration and manufacture phases, thinking this would reduce the risk of missing …
Government Response Summary
The department is taking actions recommended by the NAO, has accepted recommendations made in the King Report and in the Committee report, and will consider recommendations from the Ajax Lessons Learned Review.
16
Conclusion
Acknowledged
The Army told us it now placed greater emphasis on safety and looking after its personnel and that it had made “huge strides”. However, it acknowledged that it continued to be on a learning curve and that it still had more to do to improve safety. The Department said it …
Government Response Summary
The department has accepted all the recommendations in the King Report relating to safety and armoured vehicle procurement, some of which have already been implemented and the remainder are being progressed.
17
Conclusion
Acknowledged
The Department said that Ajax’s safety problems had highlighted broader issues around noise-induced hearing loss, which formed the largest number of claims in the armed forces compensation scheme. It has commissioned the vice-chief of the defence staff and the second permanent secretary to examine the causes of those claims to …
Government Response Summary
The department has accepted all the recommendations in the King Report relating to safety and armoured vehicle procurement, some of which have already been implemented and the remainder are being progressed.
18
Conclusion
Acknowledged
Under the terms of the contract, General Dynamics is responsible for ensuring that Ajax vehicles are safe by design. The Department oversees and monitors this, conducting trials to ensure the vehicles are safe to use.35 The two parties disagreed on whether the levels of noise and vibration in Ajax vehicles …
Government Response Summary
The department is focussed on identifying the root causes of the noise and vibration issues and will provide an update on progress to the Committee at the next Ajax evidence session.
19
Conclusion
Acknowledged
The Department told us that its contract with General Dynamics was to produce vehicles at an acceptable level of noise using existing headsets. It asserted that those headsets performed as it had assumed they would when the contract was let, something which General Dynamics disputes. However, the Department admitted that …
Government Response Summary
The department is focused on identifying the root causes of the noise and vibration issues and will provide an update on progress to the Committee at the next Ajax evidence session.
20
Conclusion
Acknowledged
General Dynamics has proposed modifications to vehicles that seek to reduce the impact of noise and vibration on crews and include, for example, the damping of hand controllers and seating, and changes to improve body posture. However, the Department said it still needed to test the whole system—including the communications …
Government Response Summary
The department is focussed on identifying the root causes of the noise and vibration issues and will provide an update on progress to the Committee at the next Ajax evidence session.
21
Conclusion
Acknowledged
The Department accepted that it cannot be certain the programme will not encounter further technical or safety issues, stating that it is usual for engineering development on this scale to encounter challenges as it goes through the development cycle. It acknowledged that it is still testing compliance with the specifications …
Government Response Summary
The department is focused on identifying the root causes of the noise and vibration issues and will provide an update on progress to the Committee at the next Ajax evidence session.
22
Conclusion
Acknowledged
The programme remains under significant pressure. When the NAO reported, the programme was more than a year behind the revised schedule, trials involving Army crews had been suspended and noise and vibration issues remained unresolved.47 General Dynamics had continued to produce Ajax vehicles despite not receiving any payment since December …
Government Response Summary
The department is focused on identifying the root causes of the noise and vibration issues and will provide an update on progress to the Committee at the next Ajax evidence session.
24
Conclusion
Acknowledged
The Department told us that it had consulted the Infrastructure and Projects Authority and HM Treasury about its plan for restoring effective governance to the programme. It said it needed to resolve the current technical issues and gain approval for any changes to the schedule and definitions of capability, including …
Government Response Summary
The Department acknowledges the need to establish realistic dates for initial and full operating capability once a suitable technical solution to the noise and vibration issues has been agreed, and notes the King Report's recommendation for a realistic delivery schedule with contingency.
25
Conclusion
Acknowledged
In 2010, when the Department let the design contract, its planning assumption was that Ajax would enter service in early 2017. It extended the expected in-service date by three 44 Q 49 45 C&AG’s Report, para 15 46 Q 87 47 C&AG’s Report, para 16 48 Qq 19, 20, 26, …
Government Response Summary
The department states it is taking actions recommended by the NAO to improve the effectiveness of the Ajax programme, has accepted recommendations made in the King Report and in this Committee report, and that insights from the independent Ajax Lessons Learned Review will be considered.
26
Conclusion
Acknowledged
The Department told us that it faced choices about the level of capability at initial and full operating capability milestones. It said it would look again at the definition of what was required, considering incremental development of the vehicles.55 The Department admitted it had already accepted concessions against the original …
Government Response Summary
The Department acknowledges the need to establish realistic dates for initial and full operating capability once a suitable technical solution to the noise and vibration issues has been agreed, and notes the King Report's recommendation for a realistic delivery schedule with contingency.
27
Conclusion
Acknowledged
Delivering the full Ajax capability depends on the Department delivering supporting programmes, including new communication systems, training facilities and infrastructure projects to store the vehicles.58 The Army will also need to transport the vehicles to military operations.59 However, the Department has encountered difficulties in delivering the enabling programmes needed to …
Government Response Summary
The department acknowledges the need to establish realistic dates for initial and full operating capability and is working to put the program on a sure footing, taking into account enabling programs.
28
Conclusion
Acknowledged
The Department told us it is seeking to design its new armoured vehicles, including Boxer and Challenger, to make through-life capability management easier. It recognised the need to update capabilities as new technologies emerge and keep pace with emerging military threats.61 It expected its new armoured vehicles to have a …
Government Response Summary
The department is actively taking actions recommended by the National Audit Office and has accepted the recommendations made in the King Report and this Committee report and insights from the Ajax Lessons Learned Review will help deliver major programmes more effectively in future.