Seventeenth Report - Immigration enforcement

Select Committee

Public Accounts Committee HC 407 18 September 2020

Report Status Government responded

Conclusions & Recommendations 23 items (5 recs)

Source View on Parliament website

Government Response (AI assessment · 23 of 23 classified)

Accepted 18

Not Addressed 2

Rejected 3

Government response

Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Seventeenth report from Session 2019-21 · published 18 Nov 2020

Read the government response ↗ Response on the tracker

Recommendations & Conclusions

2 results

6 Recommendation Not Addressed

We are not convinced that the Department is sufficiently prepared to safeguard the status of...

Recommendation

We are not convinced that the Department is sufficiently prepared to safeguard the status of individuals while also implementing a new immigration system and managing its response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Department faces several challenges in the immediate future. … Read more We are not convinced that the Department is sufficiently prepared to safeguard the status of individuals while also implementing a new immigration system and managing its response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Department faces several challenges in the immediate future. The extension of visas during the COVID-19 pandemic raises concerns that mistakes in case and data management could affect an individual’s future immigration status. The Immigration Enforcement directorate also needs to adapt to the updated vision and values the Department sets out for the UK’s future immigration system from January 2021. The Department committed again to implementing the recommendations of the Windrush lessons learned review and contacting all those who were affected, not only those from the Caribbean. Whilst we are pleased that this is the Home Office’s policy now, we note that the Department initially rejected the recommendation made by our predecessor Committee in March 2019 that the Department should extend its historical reviews beyond Caribbean Commonwealth nationals to include nationals from other Commonwealth countries. Tackling these challenges will require significant change. The Department pins its hopes on its ongoing programme of digitisation and automation to support its response to these challenges, including its implementation of Atlas, but its history of delivering such projects is patchy at best. Recommendation: Within six weeks of this report, the Department should write to this committee to explain its priorities while implementing these significant changes. Specifically, it should set out: 8 Immigration enforcement • How it will balance risks to delivery against the risk that these changes will unfairly affect the lives and rights of individuals; • What practical steps the Department has taken and will take to achieve this balance; and • What testing it has conducted to ensure that its information systems can fully support these steps. Immigration enforcement 9 Show less

Government Response Summary

The government's response does not address the recommendation to explain its priorities for balancing risks and safeguarding individuals during immigration system changes, instead discussing the Palace of Westminster Restoration and Renewal Programme.

HM Treasury

View Details

1 Conclusion Not Addressed

On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence...

Conclusion

On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence from the Home Office (the Department) about immigration enforcement activities in the UK.1

Government Response Summary

The government's response does not address the committee's introductory statement about taking evidence from the Home Office on immigration enforcement activities, instead listing unrelated NHS and social care topics.

HM Treasury

View Details