Creator remuneration

Culture, Media and Sport Committee Closed Non-inquiry session
Opened: 4 Sep 2023 Closed: 22 May 2024 Parliament page
8 Recommendations
6 Conclusions
1 Report
2 Oral sessions
2 Letters
2 Events
Activity timeline 8 events
10 Apr
2024
12 Dec
2023
12 Dec
2023
Formal meeting (oral evidence session) · The Thatcher Room, Portcullis House
19 Sep
2023
19 Sep
2023
Formal meeting (oral evidence session) · The Grimond Room, Portcullis House
Oral evidence sessions 2 sessions
Dr Hyojung Sun Merck Mercuriadis Nile Rodgers Paul Clements · Music Publishers Association Professor David Hesmondhalgh VV Brown · The Ivors Academy
Andrew Harrower · Directors UK Caroline Norbury OBE · Creative UK John Hollingworth · British Equity Collecting Society Ltd Nicola Solomon · Creators’ Rights Alliance Reema Selhi · Design and Artists Copyright Society Richard Combes · Authors’ Licensing and Collecting Society
Title HC No. Published Items Response
Fifth Report - Creator remuneration HC 156 10 Apr 2024 14 Responded
Recommendations & Conclusions
3 results
3 Conclusion Acknowledged
Fifth Report - Creator remuneration
Government's AI working group failed to produce IP code, favouring AI developers.
Despite our previous recommendations that the Government win back the trust of creators regarding their concerns over AI, its working group has not been able to bring forward a code of practice on AI and intellectual property. Although the Government … Read more
Government Response
The government acknowledges the Committee's concerns regarding the lack of a code of practice on AI and IP and the status quo favoring AI developers. They state that DCMS, DSIT, and IPO are working closely to understand issues, engaging with stakeholders, and intend to proceed with urgency to announce next steps soon, recognizing potential legislative needs.
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
View details
4 Recommendation Acknowledged
Fifth Report - Creator remuneration
Require Government to establish mechanisms and a legislative deadline for AI creator compensation.
The Government must ensure that creators have proper mechanisms to enforce their consent and receive fair compensation for use of their work by AI developers. It should set out measurable objectives for the period of engagement with the AI and … Read more
Government Response
The government acknowledges concerns about AI and copyright, stating DCMS, DSIT, and IPO are working closely with stakeholders to find a balance between innovation and creator protection. They recognise legislation may be required and intend to proceed with urgency, hoping to announce next steps soon, but do not set measurable objectives or a definitive legislative deadline.
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
View details
5 Conclusion Acknowledged
Fifth Report - Creator remuneration
Creative freelancers lack unified voice, leading to declining pay and poor conditions.
Freelancers make up a significant portion of the creative workforce but lack a single clear voice representing their interests to Government. This has resulted in a decline in pay and conditions that will cause long-term harm to the sector.
Government Response
The government acknowledges the importance of the self-employed workforce in the creative industries, noting both benefits and challenges. They highlight ongoing initiatives like the Creative Industries Sector Vision's Good Work Review and a pilot support programme for screen, and are reviewing options across departments for pan-economy support and discussing a Freelance Commissioner.
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
View details
Government Response AI assessment · 14 of 8 classified

Total 8 recs + 6 conclusions
Correspondence 2 letters
5 Mar 2024 To committee Letter from David Martin et al, Council of Music Makers, relating to the Creator Remuneration Working Group, dated 22 February 2024
Parliament page
6 Feb 2024 To committee Letter from Julia Lopez MP, Minister for Media, Tourism and Creative Industries, relating to music streaming follow-up, dated 30 January 2024
Parliament page