Russia and Ukraine border tensions

Defence Committee Closed Inquiry
Opened: 14 Apr 2021 Closed: 6 Dec 2022 Parliament page
The Committee is holding a one-off evidence session to examine the extent of Russian military build-up along the border of Eastern Ukraine over recent months. This session will focus on Russia’s military intentions and what the UK Government and NATO can do to de-escalate tension in the region.
12 Recommendations
10 Conclusions
1 Report
1 Oral session
1 Event
Oral evidence sessions 1 session
Henry Boyd · International Institute for Strategic Studies Sarah Lain · Royal United Services Institute (RUSI)
Recommendations & Conclusions
11 results
3 Recommendation Acknowledged
First Report - Russia and Ukraine …
The 1 May deadline, by when Russia said it would pull back additional troops exercising...
The 1 May deadline, by when Russia said it would pull back additional troops exercising on the border with Ukraine, has passed; the UK, working with NATO allies and other OSCE Member states, should insist Russia withdraws all its additional … Read more
Government Response
The government notes the committee's recommendation, expressing continued concern that Russia has not fully withdrawn its troops and equipment, and reiterating that its behavior is unacceptable.
Ministry of Defence
View details
4 Conclusion Acknowledged
First Report - Russia and Ukraine …
The large scale of the Russian military build-up is unusual for a normal exercise, but...
The large scale of the Russian military build-up is unusual for a normal exercise, but our evidence suggests that based on where troops are positioned in Crimea, it is unlikely to be a preparation for a full-scale Russian invasion of Eastern Ukraine.
Government Response
The Government notes the Committee's view on the Russian military build-up, acknowledging it was unusual and escalatory, and commits to carefully monitoring the situation and holding Russia accountable.
Ministry of Defence
View details
5 Conclusion Acknowledged
First Report - Russia and Ukraine …
Russia has a right to deploy troops on its own territory but also has a...
Russia has a right to deploy troops on its own territory but also has a duty to regional security and stability to be transparent about military exercises and military activity close to her borders, as set out in Section 1 … Read more
Government Response
The government agrees with the committee's statement regarding Russia's obligations for transparency in military activities and expresses disappointment that Russia is not upholding these commitments. The government reaffirms its call for Russia to adhere to OSCE principles.
Ministry of Defence
View details
7 Conclusion Acknowledged
First Report - Russia and Ukraine …
Russia has several probable motives for escalating tensions on the border with Ukraine, driven by...
Russia has several probable motives for escalating tensions on the border with Ukraine, driven by regional insecurities and President Putin’s willingness to engage in power politics. Russia is using its military for coercive diplomacy, to pressure the Ukrainian Government to … Read more
Government Response
The government notes the Committee’s view on Russia's motives and reaffirms the UK's steadfast commitment to Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, as outlined in the Integrated review and Defence Command paper.
Ministry of Defence
View details
8 Recommendation Acknowledged
First Report - Russia and Ukraine …
Russia must honour its commitments under the Vienna Document as an OSCE participating State and...
Russia must honour its commitments under the Vienna Document as an OSCE participating State and fully co-operate in OSCE meetings to support confidence and security-building measures and de-escalate conflict. The UK should, with its Allies, use the OSCE mechanisms in … Read more
Government Response
The government agrees that Russia must honour its commitments under the Vienna Document and continues to call on Russia to use OSCE processes. However, it does not commit to the specific UK actions recommended, such as using OSCE mechanisms to hold Russia to account or bringing the dispute before the Court of Conciliation and Arbitration.
Ministry of Defence
View details
10 Conclusion Acknowledged
First Report - Russia and Ukraine …
In contrast to Georgia’s response in 2008 to send in troops to counter Russian aggression,...
In contrast to Georgia’s response in 2008 to send in troops to counter Russian aggression, Ukraine has demonstrated restraint and sought to resolve the escalating situation through political and diplomatic channels.
Government Response
The government agrees with the Committee's observation, commending Ukraine's restraint and diplomatic efforts, and noting its full support for Ukraine's actions to de-escalate the situation.
Ministry of Defence
View details
17 Conclusion Acknowledged
First Report - Russia and Ukraine …
We believe the UK Government’s response to the Ukraine crisis, demonstrates a commitment to the...
We believe the UK Government’s response to the Ukraine crisis, demonstrates a commitment to the overarching themes for Global Britain set out above in the Integrated Review and the Defence Command paper. This can be evidenced in Russia and Ukraine … Read more
Government Response
The government welcomes the committee's view that its response to the Ukraine crisis demonstrates commitment to Global Britain themes, detailing its existing commitments and ongoing diplomatic support for Ukraine.
Ministry of Defence
View details
18 Conclusion Acknowledged
First Report - Russia and Ukraine …
However, Britain’s global ambitions now include a tilt to the Indo-Pacific, with the Government promising...
However, Britain’s global ambitions now include a tilt to the Indo-Pacific, with the Government promising to deepen engagement by our armed forces and establish a greater and more persistent presence there as well.
Government Response
The government acknowledges the committee's conclusion, affirming that its enhanced focus on the Indo-Pacific is a positive effort aligned with shifting global dynamics, aiming to leverage opportunities and manage risks.
Ministry of Defence
View details
19 Recommendation Acknowledged
First Report - Russia and Ukraine …
The Integrated Review identifies Russia as “the most acute direct threat to the UK”.
The Integrated Review identifies Russia as “the most acute direct threat to the UK”. The UK Government should clarify how its global ambitions, in particular its proposed tilt to the Indo-Pacific, will be balanced with deterring the threat from Russia … Read more
Government Response
The government states it is not deprioritising any regions and remains committed to both Euro-Atlantic security and Indo-Pacific engagement. It asserts that defence policy and planning mechanisms are designed to preclude overstretch, but does not offer specific clarification on how the balance will be achieved.
Ministry of Defence
View details
20 Conclusion Acknowledged
First Report - Russia and Ukraine …
We commend the UK Government for their role in intelligence sharing and monitoring the situation...
We commend the UK Government for their role in intelligence sharing and monitoring the situation in the Donbas and Crimea.
Government Response
The government welcomes the Committee's commendation for its role in intelligence sharing and monitoring, stating it will continue these efforts with allies to maintain understanding and avoid miscalculation.
Ministry of Defence
View details
21 Conclusion Acknowledged
First Report - Russia and Ukraine …
The International community has reacted quickly and united behind a clear message to Russia that...
The International community has reacted quickly and united behind a clear message to Russia that the world is watching and there will be consequences for illegal military action. Lessons have been learnt from the Georgia crisis in 2008 and the … Read more
Government Response
The government agrees with the committee's conclusion, noting Russia's pattern of aggression, and states it will continue to work with allies to learn from collective experiences and maintain a robust international response.
Ministry of Defence
View details
Government Response AI assessment · 22 of 12 classified

Total 12 recs + 10 conclusions