Defence and Climate Change

Defence Committee Closed Inquiry
Opened: 12 May 2022 Closed: 11 Dec 2023 Parliament page
What needs to be done to achieve the Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy’s number one international priority of meeting climate change and biodiversity loss commitments over the next decade? What will be the impacts of climate change on future conflict and how are UK Armed Forces … Read more
4 Recommendations
12 Conclusions
1 Report
6 Oral sessions
6 Events
Activity timeline 14 events
23 May
2023
Oral evidence
23 May
2023
Formal meeting (oral evidence session) · The Grimond Room, Portcullis House
21 Mar
2023
21 Mar
2023
Formal meeting (oral evidence session) · Room 6, Palace of Westminster
6 Mar
2023
6 Mar
2023
Formal meeting (oral evidence session) · The Grimond Room, Portcullis House
28 Feb
2023
28 Feb
2023
Formal meeting (oral evidence session) · Room 16, Palace of Westminster
24 Jan
2023
Oral evidence
24 Jan
2023
Formal meeting (oral evidence session) · Room 16, Palace of Westminster
Oral evidence sessions 6 sessions
Panel 1
John Kerry · Executive Office of the President of the United States
Baroness Annabel Goldie, Minister of State Brig. Adrian Reilly · Ministry of Defence James Clare · Ministry of Defence Lt. Gen. Richard Wardlaw OBE · Ministry of Defence Major General Robert Walton-Knight · Ministry of Defence Nick Gurr · Ministry of Defence Shimon Fhima · Ministry of Defence
David Beasley · UN World Food Programme
Dr Tim Clack · Climate Change and (In)security Project Maj. Gen. (Rtd) Dr Andrew Sharpe · Centre for Historical Analysis and Conflict Research (CHACR)
Panel 1
Dr Stuart Parkinson · Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) Linsey Cottrell · The Conflict and Environment Observatory
Panel 1
Lt. Gen. Nugee (Rtd), Lead of Ministry of Defence’s 2021 Climate Change and Sustainability Review
Recommendations & Conclusions
4 results
9 Conclusion Rejected
Eighth Report - Defence and Climat…
Measuring total defence carbon emissions provides a gold standard for military reporting.
Measuring and reporting against the total defence carbon emission figure would support both the Government’s agenda of reducing emissions to net zero by 2050, but also provide a gold standard of military emissions reporting for other countries to emulate. Good … Read more
Government Response
The government states it already publishes emissions data in its Annual Report and Accounts and re-baselined in FY21-22 to capture more directly influenced emissions, with its methodology verified internally. However, it explicitly states there are no plans to independently verify its emission reporting and it does not currently capture Scope 3 emissions from industrial partners, thus not fully meeting the "total" aspect.
Ministry of Defence
View details
10 Recommendation Rejected
Eighth Report - Defence and Climat…
Publish in-depth annual review of Defence climate performance and explain reporting discrepancies.
The Ministry of Defence should return to publishing a more in-depth, stand-alone annual review of its climate and sustainability performance, with independent verification of emissions measuring and reporting. It should commission work to better understand total defence carbon emissions. It … Read more
Government Response
The government explains the discrepancy in reported emissions figures as due to a re-baselining in FY21-22 that expanded the scope of reporting. However, it explicitly states there are currently no plans to return to a stand-alone annual review of its climate and sustainability performance.
Ministry of Defence
View details
12 Conclusion Rejected
Eighth Report - Defence and Climat…
Adopt Science-Based Targets for Defence and develop carbon reduction plans for suppliers.
We welcome the Ministry of Defence’s efforts to expand coverage of carbon emissions, but more needs to be achieved to ensure all Defence emissions are measured. Best commercial practice for promoting emissions reductions and net-zero targets are the Science Based … Read more
Government Response
The government explicitly states it is not planning on using Science Based Targets (SBT) for Defence, citing potential undermining of capabilities. While major suppliers were already obliged to publish climate reduction plans from September 2021 under PPN 06/21, HMG guidance states SBTs are not aligned with these requirements.
Ministry of Defence
View details
16 Conclusion Rejected
Eighth Report - Defence and Climat…
Appoint a dedicated Ministry of Defence climate change director for focused decarbonisation coordination.
The Ministry of Defence should appoint a dedicated climate change director who would be able to fully focus on coordinating carbon reductions across the whole of Defence, including holding separate commands and organisations to account for progress in reducing emissions … Read more
Government Response
The government rejects the recommendation to appoint a dedicated climate change director, stating that the existing Levelling Up, Union, Climate Change and Sustainability (LUCCS) Directorate already coordinates these areas, and that combining these responsibilities brings together the three pillars of sustainability within the MOD.
Ministry of Defence
View details
Government Response AI assessment · 16 of 4 classified

Total 4 recs + 12 conclusions