19 Accepted

An “artillery duel” between a modern British and Russian division would now only be likely...

Conclusion
An “artillery duel” between a modern British and Russian division would now only be likely to end one way—and not necessarily to the British Army’s advantage.
Government Response Summary
The government dismisses the premise of a direct divisional artillery duel with Russia. However, it details significant investments including £800 million for the Mobile Fires Platform, upgrades to the MLRS, and collaborative development of extended-range missiles to enhance artillery capabilities.
Paragraph Reference
76
Government Response
Accepted
HM Government Accepted
It is inconceivable that the UK would engage in Divisional artillery duel with Russia. Not only would we be shoulder to shoulder with our NATO allies, the Army in a conflict scenario would rely on a series of effectors to respond to our adversaries’ artillery, including an Air Power component. However, to enhance capabilities in this area the Integrated Review announced £800 million over 10 years for Mobile Fires Platform (self-propelled 155mm gun with automated turret), and the MOD has developed two significant programmes: the Close Support Fires Programme; and the Land Deep Fires Programme (LDFP). The Committee may recall the recent announcement of an important LDFP upgrade to our Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) missile launchers (into action almost immediately, life extended to 2050, able to fire longer range missiles) and of collaborative development with the US on the Guided MLRS-Extended Range missile (150km range). The MOD is also developing specific payloads to deliver the effects required against key target sets.
Addressee Bodies
Ministry of Defence
Timeline
Recommendation age 5.4 yrs
Report published 14 Mar 2021