6th Report - Further Education and Skills

Select Committee
Education Committee HC 666 23 September 2025
Report Status Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations 68 items (36 recs)
Source View on Parliament website
Government Response (AI assessment · 68 of 68 classified)
Accepted 21
Accepted in Part 5
Acknowledged 6
Deferred 4
Not Addressed 20
Rejected 12
Government response
6th Special Report - Further Education and Skills: Government Response · published 9 Dec 2025
Read the government response ↗ Response on the tracker
Clear

Recommendations & Conclusions

20 results
1 Conclusion Not Addressed
Skills England's current status and lack of statutory foundation compromises its independence.
Conclusion
Given the primacy of the Government’s economic growth mission, and the emphasis the Government has placed on a high-functioning and forward- looking skills system to deliver that mission, the comparison between the status of Skills England on the one hand … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government welcomes the committee's recognition and reiterates Skills England's established role as an executive agency supporting economic growth and the industrial strategy, without addressing the committee's concerns about impartiality or statutory foundation.
Department for Education
View Details
17 Conclusion Not Addressed
Strengthen support and intervention measures for Baker Clause compliance.
Conclusion
There is a stark disparity between how post-16 technical and vocational education and training pathways are presented to pupils and how academic pathways are presented, and fundamental differences in the levels of support and guidance that students receive about each. … Read more
Government Response Summary
No response provided.
Department for Education
View Details
18 Recommendation Not Addressed
Publish annual report on Baker Clause compliance, assessing non-compliance and intervention actions.
Recommendation
We recommend that Department for Education publishes an annual report on the number and proportion of schools that are complying with the Baker Clause and provider access legislation, and assesses the reasons for non-compliance. The proposed work to be carried … Read more
Government Response Summary
No response provided.
Department for Education
View Details
19 Conclusion Not Addressed
Post-16 pathway information fragmented and apprenticeship applications lack national framework.
Conclusion
Information about post-16 pathways can be fragmented, with no single platform covering both academic and vocational options. Apprenticeship applications are particularly complex due to the absence of a national framework and regional inconsistencies. Additionally, vocational application timelines are misaligned with … Read more
Government Response Summary
There is no response to this conclusion.
Department for Education
View Details
20 Recommendation Not Addressed
Expand UCAS remit to cover all post-16 pathways and align application timelines.
Recommendation
We recommend that the remit of UCAS be expanded to offer a single source of information for all routes, including academic and vocational pathways. Application timelines for vocational courses, including apprenticeships, should better align with those for university admissions. Apprenticeship … Read more
Government Response Summary
No response provided.
Department for Education
View Details
27 Recommendation Not Addressed
Improve communication and transparency with FE sector on qualification reforms and evaluate impact.
Recommendation
The Department for Education must improve the way in which it communicates with the FE sector about any future reform of qualifications, for example by ensuring that the terms of reference are published and that there is open and transparent … Read more
Government Response Summary
There is no response to this recommendation.
Department for Education
View Details
33 Conclusion Not Addressed
Foundation apprenticeships fail to target everyday sectors crucial for youth employment
Conclusion
Foundation apprenticeships have been welcomed by the sector. However, whilst these shorter apprenticeships rightly aim to help young people enter critical sectors, there are concerns about the Government’s decision not to target “everyday sectors”, such as the hospitality, retail and … Read more
Government Response Summary
There is no response to this conclusion.
Department for Education
View Details
34 Recommendation Not Addressed
Expand foundation apprenticeships to include hospitality, retail, and care sectors by April 2026
Recommendation
We recommend that the Department for Education expands the foundation apprenticeship scheme to include the hospitality, retail and care sectors— as well as other high-demand sectors for young people—by April 2026. The purpose of foundation and other shorter apprenticeships must … Read more
Government Response Summary
There is no response to this recommendation.
Department for Education
View Details
35 Conclusion Not Addressed
Adult apprenticeship maths and English changes risk widening attainment gaps and age-based inequalities
Conclusion
The current apprenticeship system faces inconsistencies as a result of recent changes to maths and English requirements for those aged 19 and over. Whilst removing the requirement for adult apprentices to attain grade 4 maths and English before completing their … Read more
Government Response Summary
There is no response to this conclusion.
Department for Education
View Details
36 Recommendation Not Addressed
Introduce three-route model for apprentices not achieving GCSE grade 4 maths and English
Recommendation
We recommend the introduction of a three-route model for all apprentices who have not attained grade 4 GCSE in maths and/or English based on their level of attainment at age 16 and their chosen apprenticeship: • Route A: Apprentices who, … Read more
Government Response Summary
There is no response to this recommendation.
Department for Education
View Details
37 Conclusion Not Addressed
Defunding level 7 apprenticeships for over 22s widely opposed and will worsen skills shortages
Conclusion
The evidence received by the Committee is overwhelmingly opposed to the Government’s decision not to fund level 7 apprenticeships for those aged 22 and over through the Growth and Skills Levy. The defunding of these apprenticeships will reduce uptake—particularly in … Read more
Government Response Summary
There is no response to this conclusion.
Department for Education
View Details
38 Recommendation Not Addressed
Re-introduce levy funding for level 7 apprenticeships for all ages in growth sectors and regulated professions
Recommendation
We recommend that the Department for Education re-introduces levy funding for level 7 apprenticeships for all ages within the eight growth- driving sectors and for regulated professions, such as healthcare. (Recommendation, Paragraph 149)
Government Response Summary
No response provided.
Department for Education
View Details
39 Recommendation Not Addressed
Monitor impact of defunding other level 7 apprenticeships for over 22s; reintroduce funding when needed
Recommendation
The Department must monitor the impact of defunding all other level 7 apprenticeships for those aged 22 and over and be willing to reintroduce levy funding where necessary. (Recommendation, Paragraph 150) Supporting further education students
Government Response Summary
Despite stating "ACCEPT", the government's response does not commit to monitoring the impact of defunding Level 7 apprenticeships for those aged 22 and over or to being willing to reintroduce levy funding. It instead discusses broader apprenticeship reforms and support for SMEs and younger apprentices.
Department for Education
View Details
41 Recommendation Not Addressed
Accelerate Mental Health Support Team rollout for 100% post-16 coverage by 2029-30, publishing impact data.
Recommendation
The Government’s pledge of 100% MHST coverage by 2029–30 must be met and must include all post-16 students and trainees. We recommend that Government accelerates the rollout of Mental Health Support Teams with a particular focus on expanding coverage for … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states its commitment to improving mental health support for FE students through guidance, a whole-college approach, and the appointment of an FE Student Support Champion, but does not address accelerating MHST rollout or monitoring its impact.
Department for Education
View Details
42 Recommendation Not Addressed
Improve access to CAMHS and adult mental health services for young people with severe conditions.
Recommendation
The Government must improve access to Children and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) and adult mental health services for those children and young people with more severe mental health conditions and whose education is often interrupted for months or years … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government outlines existing commitments to improve mental health support for FE students through a whole-college approach, guidance, and the appointment of an FE Student Support Champion. It does not specifically address improving access to CAMHS and adult mental health services or reducing wait times for severe mental health conditions.
Department for Education
View Details
46 Conclusion Not Addressed
Ministerial responsibility split leads to neglect and fragmentation of FE SEND policy.
Conclusion
SEND policy is currently overseen by the Minister for School Standards whilst further education policy lies with the Minister for Skills. This split in ministerial responsibility has led to the neglect of FE SEND policy, as well as inefficiencies, limited … Read more
Government Response Summary
No response provided.
Department for Education
View Details
47 Recommendation Not Addressed
Consolidate Further Education SEND policy under the Minister for Skills' portfolio.
Recommendation
We recommend that the Department for Education consolidates FE SEND policy under the Minister for Skills’ portfolio. (Recommendation, Paragraph 176)
Government Response Summary
There is no response to this recommendation.
Department for Education
View Details
48 Conclusion Not Addressed
Inconsistent free transport for post-16 SEND students due to lack of legal requirement.
Conclusion
Local authorities in England are not legally required to provide free transport for the majority post-16 students with SEND, leading to inconsistent and often inadequate support. Financial pressures have 99 caused many councils to restrict eligibility and reduce services, making … Read more
Government Response Summary
No response provided.
Department for Education
View Details
49 Recommendation Not Addressed
Extend statutory duty for local authorities to provide home-to-college transport for post-16 SEND.
Recommendation
We recommend that the Department for Education considers extending the statutory duty on local authorities to provide home-to-college transport for further education students with SEND from the age of 16 to
Government Response Summary
No response provided.
Department for Education
View Details
53 Conclusion Not Addressed
Record detailed post-16 pathway and long-term outcome data for care-experienced individuals.
Conclusion
The Department must record data on post-16 pathways and attainment for those with care experience—including detailed data on qualifications, course types and completion rates. The Department should also monitor long-term outcomes—employment quality, income levels, and 100 higher education progression for … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government details existing initiatives like the Youth Guarantee and other support mechanisms for young people, but its response does not address the specific recommendation to record and monitor data on post-16 pathways and long-term outcomes for those with care experience.
Department for Education
View Details