Legg Inquiry into the Sandline Affair

Legg Inquiry

Independent inquiry conducted by Sir Thomas Legg and Sir Robin Ibbs into the conduct of Foreign Office officials during the Sandline affair, in which British company Sandline International supplied arms to Sierra Leone in alleged breach of a UN arms embargo.

Read the full description

Independent inquiry conducted by Sir Thomas Legg and Sir Robin Ibbs into the conduct of Foreign Office officials during the Sandline affair, in which British company Sandline International supplied arms to Sierra Leone in alleged breach of a UN arms embargo. Found 30 specific criticisms of the Foreign Office attributing failures to systemic and cultural factors within the department.

Where it stands

The report of the Sierra Leone arms investigation was published on 27 July 1998.

ChairSir Thomas Legg KCB QCCivil servant
Commissioned byForeign, Commonwealth & Development OfficeOriginally Foreign Office; Sandline Affair (Sierra Leone)
Established18 May 1998
Final report27 Jul 1998
Duration2 months
Historical inquiry (pre-Inquiries Act 2005). Listed for reference; recommendation progress is not actively tracked.

Reports & recommendations

Reports →
  • The report of the Sierra Leone arms investigation27 July 1998

Latest evidence

All 4 documents →

Legacy & Impact

The Legg Inquiry of 1998 examined the 'arms-to-Sierra Leone' affair, in which Sandline International, a private military company, supplied arms to forces supporting the deposed President Kabbah of Sierra Leone. This appeared to breach a United Nations arms embargo that the UK had helped establish. Sir Thomas Legg KCB QC conducted a rapid non-statutory inquiry, reporting within four months of establishment. The inquiry found that the Foreign and Commonwealth Office had received intelligence about Sandline's activities but had not taken adequate steps to prevent the shipment or inform ministers. Legg identified failures in communication within the FCO and between the FCO and HM Customs and Excise. The inquiry made no formal recommendations. Following publication, Foreign Secretary Robin Cook faced criticism in Parliament but remained in post. The affair contributed to parliamentary debate about the regulation of private military companies, though no statutory framework followed. A 2002 Green Paper on private military companies referenced the Sandline affair, but legislative proposals did not progress. The inquiry remains significant as an example of rapid non-statutory investigation into politically sensitive matters involving foreign policy and commercial military services. Its focus on administrative processes and communications within government departments, rather than issuing recommendations for reform, distinguished it from many other public inquiries of the period.
Lasting Reforms
• No specific reforms directly attributed to this inquiry have been identified in the public record, as the inquiry made no formal recommendations
Unfinished Business
None identified - the inquiry made no formal recommendations
Summary written by the tracker with AI assistance, 26 March 2026. Not part of the inquiry record; indicative, not authoritative.