Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry

Completed

Mid Staffs Inquiry

Chair Robert Francis QC Legal professional (non-judge)
Established 09 Jun 2010
Final Report 06 Feb 2013
Commissioned by Department of Health and Social Care

Public inquiry into the serious failings in care at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust between 2005-2009, where patients were routinely neglected and standards of care were appalling. The Francis Report made 290 recommendations for fundamental culture change to put patients first, including statutory duty of candour, enhanced CQC powers, nursing standards, and NHS leadership reforms.

Evidence & Impact
The Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry, chaired by Sir Robert Francis QC, examined failures in care at Stafford Hospital between 2005 and 2009. The inquiry's report, published in February 2013, made 290 recommendations aimed at preventing similar failures across the NHS.

The government responded through two documents: 'Patients First and Foremost' in March 2013 and 'Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First' in November 2013. According to these responses, the government accepted 201 recommendations (69%), accepted in principle 60 recommendations (21%), partially accepted 20 recommendations (7%), and did not accept 9 recommendations (3%).

The government response identified several key reforms, including establishing a new Chief Inspector of Hospitals, strengthening the Care Quality Commission's inspection regime, introducing a statutory duty of candour, and implementing a fit and proper person test for NHS directors. The response also referenced the creation of Health Education England and Healthwatch England as part of wider NHS reforms.

However, the available evidence indicates limited published documentation of progress beyond these initial responses. Of the 290 recommendations, 281 (97%) are recorded as 'Awaiting Action' with no formal progress updates or implementation reviews identified in the public record. This suggests that while the government accepted the majority of Francis's recommendations and announced several high-profile reforms, comprehensive evidence of wider implementation across all recommendations has not been published.

The absence of systematic progress reporting makes it difficult to assess which of the accepted recommendations have been acted upon beyond the headline reforms announced in 2013. No formal implementation review has been identified that would provide comprehensive evidence of progress across all 290 recommendations.
Reforms Attributed to This Inquiry
- Care Quality Commission inspection regime strengthened with new Chief Inspector of Hospitals position created
- Statutory duty of candour introduced requiring NHS organisations to inform patients when care goes wrong
- Fit and proper person test established for NHS directors
- Fundamental standards of care introduced as regulatory requirements
- NHS Constitution strengthened with explicit patient rights
- Health Education England established to oversee workforce planning and training
- Healthwatch England created as national consumer champion for health and social care
Unfinished Business
- No published evidence identified for progress on 281 of 290 recommendations (97%)
- Recommendations on nurse staffing levels and mandatory minimum ratios
- Proposals for enhanced whistleblowing protections and support systems
- Recommendations on professional regulation reform
- Proposals for patient complaint handling improvements
- Recommendations on healthcare professional training and development
- Proposals for NHS board governance and accountability mechanisms
AI-generated narrative. Generated 26 Mar 2026 using claude-opus-4. Assessment is indicative, not authoritative.
Implementation Reviewed By
DHSC and NHS England (implementation update provided to the Thirlwall Inquiry) (Apr 2025)
DHSC and NHS England provided the Thirlwall Inquiry with an update on the implementation of this inquiry's recommendations (April 2025). This is the government's own account of progress, submitted to the inquiry, rather than an independent assessment by the inquiry. Across 290 recommendation(s) the reviewed extent of implementation was stated as: 73 Implemented - Ongoing; 59 Implemented – Ongoing; 54 Superseded; 23 Implemented – Closed; 21 Implemented - Closed; 10 Partially implemented – Ongoing; 9 Not accepted; 7 Implemented – Ongoing.; 4 Partially Implemented - Ongoing; 4 Partially implemented - Closed; 4 Not yet actioned; 3 Partially implemented – Closed; 3 Partially Implemented – Closed; 3 Partially implemented - Ongoing; 2 Superseded.; 2 Implemented – ongoing; 2 Implemented - ongoing; 1 Partially Implemented – closed (with respect to reporting requirements.); 1 Partially Implemented - ongoing; 1 Implemented – Closed.; 1 Implemented: Ongoing; 1 Implemented – ongoing (named infrastructure is partly superseded); 1 Not yet actioned (no independent regulator in place); 1 In progress.
2 years, 8 months Duration
£13m Total Cost
250 Witnesses
139 Hearing Days
1,000,000 Documents
1,781 Report Pages
Government Response

Total Recommendations 290
Data last updated: 1 Apr 2025 · Source
Data verified: 6 Feb 2026 (Claude)
Blanket response: Government responded via "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (2014), a single document covering all 290 recommendations with a blanket acceptance. Individual recommendation responses were not broken out.
How to read this

Government Response tracks what the government said it would do (accepted, rejected, etc.).

Full methodology

09 Jun 2010
Inquiry Announced
01 Nov 2010
Inquiry Established
06 Feb 2013
Final Report Published

Recommendations (9)

F19
Not Accepted
Gaps between the understood functions of separate regulators
Recommendation

There should be a single regulator dealing both with corporate governance, financial competence, viability and compliance with patient safety and quality standards for all trusts.

Published evidence summary
- The government did not accept this recommendation in 2013 (Mid Staffordshire NHS FT public inquiry: government response, Department of Health and Social Care, 19 November 2013).
- A government implementation update in April 2025 confirmed that the recommendation for a single regulator was not accepted (DHSC and NHS England implementation update to the Thirlwall Inquiry, April 2025).
- In 2016, Monitor and the NHS Trust Development Authority merged to form NHS Improvement, which subsequently merged with NHS England in 2022, while the Care Quality Commission remained a separate regulator for quality standards (Independent evidence report, Department of Health / NHS England, 6 February 2026).
- The Penny Dash Review in 2024 found significant failings at the Care Quality Commission, leading the Health Secretary to declare the regulator "not fit for purpose" (Review into the operational effectiveness of the Care Quality Commission, DHSC, 15 October 2024).
- The Learn from Patient Safety Events (LFPSE) service replaced the National Reporting and Learning System on 30 June 2024 (NHS England - Learn from Patient Safety Events update, 30 June 2024).
Department of Health and Social Care (Primary)
View Details
F61
Not Accepted
Consolidation of regulatory functions
Recommendation
A merger of system regulatory functions between Monitor and the Care Quality Commission should be undertaken incrementally and after thorough planning. Such a move should not be used as a justification for reduction of the resources allocated to this area … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The government did not accept the recommendation to merge system regulatory functions between Monitor and the Care Quality Commission (Hard Truths: the journey to putting patients first volume 2, DHSC, November 2013).
- Monitor was merged with the Trust Development Authority to form NHS Improvement in April 2016, and subsequently merged with NHS England in July 2022 (Health and Care Act 2022).
- The Department of Health and Social Care confirmed in April 2025 that this recommendation was not accepted (DHSC and NHS England implementation update to the Thirlwall Inquiry, April 2025).
Department of Health and Social Care (Primary)
View Details
F64
Not Accepted
Authorisation of foundation trusts
Recommendation
The authorisation process should be conducted by one regulator, which should be equipped with the relevant powers and expertise to undertake this effectively. With due regard to protecting the public from the adverse consequences inherent to any reorganisation, the regulation … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The government did not accept this recommendation in 2013, stating that the Care Quality Commission should focus on safety and quality while Monitor focused on economic regulation (Hard Truths: the journey to putting patients first volume 2, Department of Health, November 2013).
- The Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England stated in April 2025 that NHS England remains responsible for licensing and oversight, while the Care Quality Commission is responsible for registration and inspection (DHSC and NHS England implementation update to the Thirlwall Inquiry, April 2025).
- The Health and Care Act 2022 formally merged Monitor's functions into NHS England rather than the Care Quality Commission (Health and Care Act 2022).
Department of Health and Social Care (Primary)
View Details
F137
Not Accepted
Intervention and sanctions for substandard or unsafe services
Recommendation
Commissioners should have powers of intervention where substandard or unsafe services are being provided, including requiring the substitution of staff or other measures necessary to protect patients from the risk of harm. In the provision of the commissioned services, such … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The government did not accept this recommendation in 2013 (Hard Truths: the journey to putting patients first volume 2, DHSC, November 2013).
- DHSC and NHS England stated in April 2025 that the NHS Standard Contract includes provisions for service suspension or contract termination if a provider is providing unsafe or consistently low-quality services (DHSC/NHS England implementation update to Thirlwall Inquiry, April 2025).
- The Penny Dash Review in October 2024 found significant failings at the Care Quality Commission, including a lack of specialist inspector expertise and a backlog of 5,000 notifications of concern (Review into the operational effectiveness of the Care Quality Commission, DHSC, October 2024).
Commissioners (Primary)
View Details
F145
Not Accepted
Structure of Local Healthwatch
Recommendation

There should be a consistent basic structure for Local Healthwatch throughout the country, in accordance with the principles set out in Chapter 6: Patient and public local involvement and scrutiny.

Published evidence summary
- The government stated in November 2013 that it did not accept the recommendation for a consistent basic structure for Local Healthwatch, citing the importance of local autonomy (Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First, DHSC, November 2013).
- DHSC confirmed in April 2025 that this recommendation remains not accepted (DHSC/NHS England implementation update to the Thirlwall Inquiry, April 2025).
Department of Health and Social Care (Primary)
View Details
F183
Not Accepted
Criminal liability
Recommendation
It should be made a criminal offence for any registered medical practitioner, or nurse, or allied health professional or director of an authorised or registered healthcare organisation: Knowingly to obstruct another in the performance of these statutory duties; To provide … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The government did not accept this recommendation in its 2013 response (Hard Truths: the journey to putting patients first, DHSC, November 2013).
- The Department of Health and Social Care confirmed in April 2025 that this recommendation remains not accepted (DHSC and NHS England implementation update provided to the Thirlwall Inquiry, April 2025).
Department of Health and Social Care (Primary)
View Details
F209
Not Accepted
Registration of healthcare support workers
Recommendation
A registration system should be created under which no unregistered person should be permitted to provide for reward direct physical care to patients currently under the care and treatment of a registered nurse or a registered doctor (or who are … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The government did not accept the recommendation to create a registration system for healthcare support workers (Hard Truths: the journey to putting patients first volume 2, DHSC, November 2013).
- DHSC and NHS England confirmed in April 2025 that this recommendation remains not accepted (DHSC and NHS England implementation update provided to the Thirlwall Inquiry, April 2025).
- In February 2026, Robert Francis stated that the rejection of healthcare assistant registration left the public at risk (Ten Years After Francis: A Review, February 2026).
Department of Health and Social Care (Primary)
View Details
F212
Not Accepted
Training standards for healthcare support workers
Recommendation
The code of conduct, education and training standards and requirements for registration for healthcare support workers should be prepared and maintained by the Nursing and Midwifery Council after due consultation with all relevant stakeholders, including the Department of Health, other … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The government did not accept the recommendation that the Nursing and Midwifery Council should prepare and maintain the code of conduct and registration for healthcare support workers (Hard Truths: the journey to putting patients first volume 2, DHSC, November 2013).
- DHSC and NHS England confirmed in April 2025 that this recommendation remains not accepted (DHSC and NHS England implementation update provided to the Thirlwall Inquiry, April 2025).
NMC (Primary)
View Details
F213
Not Accepted
Training standards for healthcare support workers
Recommendation
Until such time as the Nursing and Midwifery Council is charged with the recommended regulatory responsibilities, the Department of Health should institute a nationwide system to protect patients and care receivers from harm. This system should be supported by fair … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The government did not accept the recommendation to institute a nationwide system for dismissing healthcare support workers for serious breaches of conduct (Hard Truths: the journey to putting patients first volume 2, DHSC, November 2013).
- DHSC and NHS England confirmed in April 2025 that this recommendation remains not accepted (DHSC and NHS England implementation update provided to the Thirlwall Inquiry, April 2025).
Department of Health and Social Care (Primary)
View Details