The Litvinenko Inquiry
CompletedLitvinenko Inquiry
Inquiry into the death of Alexander Litvinenko who was poisoned with polonium-210 in London in 2006. Found the FSB operation was probably approved by Putin. ECHR later ruled Russia responsible.
11 months
Duration
£2.5m
Total Cost
Parliamentary Activity 2 Click to expand
2 questions
since Apr 2016
02 Dec 2025
14 Apr 2016
Reports (1) Click to expand
| Title | Volume | Publication Date | Tracked recs | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Litvinenko Inquiry: Report into the death of Alexander Litvinenko | Final | 21 Jan 2016 | 5 |
Timeline (3) Click to expand
22 Jul 2014
Inquiry Announced
27 Jan 2015
Inquiry Established
21 Jan 2016
Final Report Published
Recommendations (5)
Closed Recommendation
Recommendation
One recommendation contained within the closed section of the report (classified).
Published evidence summary
Government reports this recommendation as delivered. Sanctions and arrest warrants remain in place.
Home Office
(Primary)
View Details
Asset Freezes on Suspects
Recommendation
Asset freezes should be implemented against the suspects Andrey Lugovoy and Dmitri Kovtun.
Published evidence summary
Government reports this recommendation as delivered. Sanctions and arrest warrants remain in place.
Home Office
(Primary)
View Details
Maintain Arrest Warrants
Recommendation
Interpol notices and European Arrest Warrants should remain in place for the suspects.
Published evidence summary
Government reports this recommendation as delivered. Sanctions and arrest warrants remain in place.
Home Office
(Primary)
View Details
Diplomatic Representations to Russia
Recommendation
Senior diplomatic representations should be made to Russia regarding its failure to cooperate with justice.
Published evidence summary
Government reports this recommendation as delivered. Sanctions and arrest warrants remain in place.
Foreign Office
(Primary)
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
(Primary)
View Details
Review Further Legal Actions
Recommendation
The Director of Public Prosecutions should consider whether further action can be taken on extradition and asset freezing.
Published evidence summary
Government reports this recommendation as delivered. Sanctions and arrest warrants remain in place.
Home Office
(Primary)
View Details