Reports & recommendations

26 recommendations, each with the government response on the record. Filter by government response or delivery status.

Title Volume Publication Date Recommendations Links
Report into the Death of Jermaine Baker - 05 Jul 2022 26

Recommendations (6)

JB-15.4
Under consideration

Amend firearms authorisation forms for risk assessment and tipping points

Recommendation
There should be an amendment to FA (and equivalent) forms to: a. encourage a multidimensional risk assessment (to comply with Article 2) to minimise, to the greatest extent possible, recourse to lethal force; b. include a provision for reference to …
In brief (written by this site)

Writing for the College of Policing and NPCC Armed Policing in October 2022, Andy Walker stated that an ongoing national review of command log standards would explicitly reflect the recommendation's requirements, with the results to be incorporated into authorised professional practice (Andy Walker response, Oct 2022). The Metropolitan Police Service reported in October 2022 that it had issued interim guidance to tactical advisers, but noted that further force guidance and training remained dependent on the national review (Metropolitan Police Service response, Oct 2022). The record holds no update since the Metropolitan Police Service's response of October 2022 (Metropolitan Police Service response, Oct 2022).

Metropolitan Police Service · 28 Oct 2022 Under consideration
Words of: Metropolitan Police Service, Public Inquiry into the Death of Jermaine Baker: Update on Recommendations, 28 October 2022
More broadly, and while the work at a national level is ongoing, internal guidance has been issued to all CTSFO Tac Advisors within MO19 regarding the need to tailor FA5 forms to a given operation, and to identify the use of any copy used in previous forms (chiefly the tool kit or menu of firearms tactics text) by the use of highlight or other signifier within the text. The MPS will give further, formal guidance to Firearms Commanders in light of the NPCC project’s findings, recommendations or requirements in due course. 13. As noted above in relation to multidimensional risk …
Read full response to JB-15.4 (opens in a new tab)

College of Policing · 27 Oct 2022 Noted
Words of: Andy Walker, Head of Delivery, Uniformed Policing, College of Policing, for the College and NPCC Armed Policing, in a letter to Abigail Scholefield, Jermaine Baker Public Inquiry, 27 October 2022
As noted above, the FA forms utilised by the MPS are derived from elements of the national command log and developed to complement the MPS operational command model and process for seeking authority to deploy armed officers. a) The requirement to complete and revise a multidimensional threat assessment throughout an armed operation, and commencing at the planning stage, is included in relevant national curriculum. The ongoing command log review being undertaken by NPCC will explicitly include the requirement to complete and record multidimensional threat assessments throughout an operation. b) The NPFTC includes an explanation and specific definitions of ‘tipping point’ …
Read full response to JB-15.4 (opens in a new tab)
National Police Chiefs Council (Primary)
View details of JB-15.4
JB-15.8
Under consideration

National guidance on recording firearms planning meetings

Recommendation

The NPCC and/or College of Policing should ensure that these amendments are reflected in the guidance and training given to forces nationally.

In brief (written by this site)

In October 2022, Andy Walker, writing on behalf of the College of Policing and NPCC Armed Policing, stated that existing national guidance lacked the recommended detail and that Authorised Professional Practice on recording armed operation briefings was being reviewed (Andy Walker response, Oct 2022). The Metropolitan Police Service stated in October 2022 that recording firearms briefings remained under review with national colleagues, leaving revised guidance outstanding (Metropolitan Police Service response, Oct 2022). The record holds no update since the Metropolitan Police Service's response of October 2022 (Metropolitan Police Service response, Oct 2022).

Metropolitan Police Service · 28 Oct 2022 Under consideration
Words of: Metropolitan Police Service, Public Inquiry into the Death of Jermaine Baker: Update on Recommendations, 28 October 2022
The MPS has issued internal guidance to all SFCs and TFCs that planning meetings for authorised armed operations must have comprehensive minutes recorded to ensure operational clarity and to provide an audit trail. The latest iteration of the MPS Police Use of Firearms Standard Operating Procedure (PUoF SOP) is consistent with APP-AP in relation to this. 18. This recommendation applies only to the MPS Armed Policing Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) which is the document referred to at paragraph [17] above. Amendment to the PUoF SOP however will have a limited effect upon officers in non-firearms roles. The MPS accepted at …
Read full response to JB-15.8 (opens in a new tab)

College of Policing · 27 Oct 2022 Noted
Words of: Andy Walker, Head of Delivery, Uniformed Policing, College of Policing, for the College and NPCC Armed Policing, in a letter to Abigail Scholefield, Jermaine Baker Public Inquiry, 27 October 2022
The APP-AP promotes the principles of transparency. However, it is recognised that the current guidance does not include the specific detail that has been recommended. APP currently includes the following guidance: ‘Any consideration in respect of the deployment of AFOs should be recorded along with the decision and rationale for it … Commanders have a responsibility to record their decisions, actions and supporting rationale as accurately and fully as is practicable, using the NDM as the structure. This should be done contemporaneously if possible, commencing at the point at which they begin to consider any incident that may require the …
Read full response to JB-15.8 (opens in a new tab)
National Police Chiefs Council (Primary)
View details of JB-15.8
JB-15.9
Under consideration

Intelligence briefing requirements during operations

Recommendation
The College of Policing's Authorised Professional Practice – Armed Policing (APP-AP) should clarify that, during the course of an operation, any relevant intelligence should be briefed out to the firearms officers even if it is appropriate, in the circumstances, to …
In brief (written by this site)

The College of Policing stated in October 2022 that it was reviewing Authorised Professional Practice to assess whether further guidance could be included regarding "limitation warnings", and would examine curriculum content to clarify terminology (Andy Walker response, Oct 2022). The Metropolitan Police Service stated in October 2022 that it had conveyed its willingness to assist with the review (Metropolitan Police Service response, Oct 2022). The record holds no update since the Metropolitan Police Service's response of October 2022 (Metropolitan Police Service response, Oct 2022).

Metropolitan Police Service · 28 Oct 2022 Noted
Words of: Metropolitan Police Service, Public Inquiry into the Death of Jermaine Baker: Update on Recommendations, 28 October 2022
This is a complex issue for the reasons explored in detail in the Inquiry hearings. Whilst there is an obvious difficulty inherent in providing guidance to cover the multitude of situations which Firearms Commanders and AFOs will have to deal with during a deployment, the MPS has conveyed its willingness to assist the College of Policing in a review of APP-AP on this point.
Read full response to JB-15.9 (opens in a new tab)

College of Policing · 27 Oct 2022 Under consideration
Words of: Andy Walker, Head of Delivery, Uniformed Policing, College of Policing, for the College and NPCC Armed Policing, in a letter to Abigail Scholefield, Jermaine Baker Public Inquiry, 27 October 2022
Recommendations 9 and 10 relate to the content and language utilised in briefing. Commanders are trained to recognise and differentiate between facts and assumptions, and to ensure that where, based on incomplete intelligence, assumptions have been made they should make that clear to those being briefed. These principles can be appropriately applied to operational circumstances. It is not practicable however to issue specific guidance that could be equally applied to a variety of situations and commanders are made aware that the briefing provided may have an influence on the officers threat assessment. APP provides the following guidance: ‘Commanders should seek …
Read full response to JB-15.9 (opens in a new tab)
College of Policing (Primary)
View details of JB-15.9
JB-15.10
Under consideration

Training on clear intelligence communication

Recommendation

When intelligence is being provided, the use of any language that is capable of misinterpretation is to be avoided. Training to address this point should be provided to all officers and staff directly or indirectly involved in armed operations.

In brief (written by this site)

Andy Walker, Head of Delivery, Uniformed Policing, stated on behalf of the College of Policing and NPCC Armed Policing in October 2022 that it was reviewing Authorised Professional Practice to assess whether to include guidance on "limitation warnings" and reviewing curriculum content to clarify terminology (Andy Walker response, Oct 2022). The Metropolitan Police Service stated in October 2022 that it was actively reviewing steps to address consistency of language between armed operations personnel alongside that national review (Metropolitan Police Service response, Oct 2022). The record holds no update since the Metropolitan Police Service's response of October 2022 (Metropolitan Police Service response, Oct 2022).

Metropolitan Police Service · 28 Oct 2022 Under consideration
Words of: Metropolitan Police Service, Public Inquiry into the Death of Jermaine Baker: Update on Recommendations, 28 October 2022
The MPS is actively reviewing what steps can be taken to address the issue of consistency of language between firearms officers and other staff working directly or indirectly in armed operations alongside the forthcoming review of APP-AP which will also address these points.
Read full response to JB-15.10 (opens in a new tab)

College of Policing · 27 Oct 2022 Under consideration
Words of: Andy Walker, Head of Delivery, Uniformed Policing, College of Policing, for the College and NPCC Armed Policing, in a letter to Abigail Scholefield, Jermaine Baker Public Inquiry, 27 October 2022
Recommendations 9 and 10 relate to the content and language utilised in briefing. Commanders are trained to recognise and differentiate between facts and assumptions, and to ensure that where, based on incomplete intelligence, assumptions have been made they should make that clear to those being briefed. These principles can be appropriately applied to operational circumstances. It is not practicable however to issue specific guidance that could be equally applied to a variety of situations and commanders are made aware that the briefing provided may have an influence on the officers threat assessment. APP provides the following guidance: ‘Commanders should seek …
Read full response to JB-15.10 (opens in a new tab)
College of Policing (Primary)
View details of JB-15.10
JB-15.15
Under consideration

SOP for covert monitoring post evidence recording

Recommendation

When a CMP is being used to gather evidence or intelligence, the MPS (and other forces) should consider developing an SOP to ensure that the information is adequately recorded to provide a clear audit trail.

In brief (written by this site)

In October 2022, the Metropolitan Police Service stated that it had not yet developed a standard operating procedure because of anticipated changes to digital platforms, adding that further consideration would follow the introduction of national technical solutions (Metropolitan Police Service response, Oct 2022). Earlier in October 2022, Chris Haward, NPCC Lead for Surveillance, reported that a Situational Awareness system was in procurement and implementation while a Decision and Case Management System remained in design and development (Chris Haward response, Oct 2022). The record holds no update since the Metropolitan Police Service's response of October 2022 (Metropolitan Police Service response, Oct 2022).

Metropolitan Police Service · 28 Oct 2022 Under consideration
Words of: Metropolitan Police Service, Public Inquiry into the Death of Jermaine Baker: Update on Recommendations, 28 October 2022
Finally, the MPS recognises the need to improve information sharing and recording tools, both for live operational purposes and to ensure a clear audit trail. At present, there is ongoing work at a national level to improve electronic logging systems for situational awareness and decision case management. The MPS is contributing as a key policing stakeholder in the development of the planned Dynamic Decision and Case Management System (D-DaCS) which is in the design stage. In light of anticipated significant changes to digital platforms used in CMPs, the MPS has not yet developed an SOP. Instead, the MPS has focused …
Read full response to JB-15.15 (opens in a new tab)

National Police Chiefs Council · 20 Oct 2022 Noted
Words of: Chris Haward, NPCC Lead for Surveillance, in a letter to Abigail Scholefield, Fieldfisher, solicitors to the Inquiry, 20 October 2022
A number of digital platforms are currently in use within UKLE to record information / intelligence flow and resultant decision making. Two solutions, Situational Awareness system and a Decision and Case Management System, are currently being developed to better record and manage decision making within proactive operations (SIO / TFC). The Situational Awareness system is currently in procurement and implementation whilst the Decision / Case Management System is still in design and development.
Read full response to JB-15.15 (opens in a new tab)
Metropolitan Police Service (Primary)
View details of JB-15.15
JB-15.19
Under consideration

Guidance on uniformity of firearms commands

Recommendation
Advice should be given by the College of Policing about the benefits of uniformity in instructions and commands. Ultimate discretion as to what is said must be left to the CTSFOs, based on the situation that confronts them, but the …
In brief (written by this site)

In October 2022, the College of Policing stated that it was consulting with the National Police Chiefs' Council, operational commanders, and practitioners to review guidance and assess the potential for greater clarity (Andy Walker response, Oct 2022). The Metropolitan Police Service confirmed in October 2022 that it was in consultation on the issue and welcomed assistance regarding best practice in firearms operations (Metropolitan Police Service response, Oct 2022). The record holds no update since the College of Policing's response of October 2022 (Andy Walker response, Oct 2022).

Metropolitan Police Service · 28 Oct 2022 Noted
Words of: Metropolitan Police Service, Public Inquiry into the Death of Jermaine Baker: Update on Recommendations, 28 October 2022
The MPS is in consultation with the College of Policing in relation to this issue, in line with the evidence given by Chief Firearms Instructor Philip Taylor. The MPS welcomes any and all assistance from the College of Policing and specialist firearms bodies as to best practice in firearms operations.
Read full response to JB-15.19 (opens in a new tab)

College of Policing · 27 Oct 2022 Under consideration
Words of: Andy Walker, Head of Delivery, Uniformed Policing, College of Policing, for the College and NPCC Armed Policing, in a letter to Abigail Scholefield, Jermaine Baker Public Inquiry, 27 October 2022
Armed officers train extensively in practically based scenarios where clear communication is practiced and assessed. Where practicable in the circumstances, instructions or communication will be a provided by a single officer. This is however not always practicable or realistic where multiple subjects and officers are involved. As a consequence of this recommendation, the College is consulting with NPCC, MPS and operational commanders and practitioners to review current guidance and assess the potential for greater clarity.
Read full response to JB-15.19 (opens in a new tab)
College of Policing (Primary)
View details of JB-15.19