Ronald Sherlock

PFD Report Historic (No Identified Response) Ref: 2013-0181
Date of Report 9 August 2013
Coroner William Armstrong
Coroner Area Norfolk
Response Deadline est. 4 October 2013
No published response · Over 2 years old
Sent To
Response Status
Responses 0 of 1
56-Day Deadline 4 Oct 2013
Over 2 years old — no identified published response
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroner’s Concerns
The MATTER OF CONCERN is as follows. –

Prisoners accommodated in the Older Prisoners Unit of HM Prison Norwich do not have appropriate access to speech and language therapists who can provide assessments to those with swallowing difficulties and make necessary recommendations as to their medical management including the regulation of fluid and food intake and the provision of a soft diet.

This omission was acknowledged at the hearing by a professional witness for the health service provider of Norwich Prison SERCO.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the 30th of April 2012 I commenced an investigation into the death of Ronald Sherlock, Aged 92. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 2nd of August 2013. The conclusion of the inquest was

Ia Chest infection Ib Chronic Kidney Disease Ic Diabetes Mellitus

II Atrial Fibrillation

NATURAL CAUSES
Circumstances of the Death
Ronald Sherlock was a prisoner serving a sentence at HM Prison Norwich. He had been sentenced to life imprisonment in 1979 and been at HM Prison Norwich since April 2005. Mr Sherlock suffered from a number of natural medical conditions including heart problems, high blood pressure, lung disease, prostate cancer, diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease. He was being closely monitored and was resident on the older prisoners unit. His health had been deteriorating for some time and he was diagnosed with a chest infection on the 5th of April 2012. On the 24th of April 2012, a healthcare assistant entered his cell to carry out a check and found him unresponsive. Medical help was summoned but he could not be revived and was pronounced dead. No post mortem was carried out and I accepted at the inquest the evidence of the treating doctor that the cause of death was:
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Standardised Advance Care Planning
COVID-19 Inquiry
No person-centred care
Patient-focused correspondence
Paterson Inquiry
No person-centred care
Explaining independent sector differences
Paterson Inquiry
No person-centred care
Reflection period for consent
Paterson Inquiry
No person-centred care
Communicating complaint escalation
Paterson Inquiry
No person-centred care
Mandatory independent complaint resolution
Paterson Inquiry
No person-centred care
Age-Appropriate Hospital Settings
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
No person-centred care
Bedside Display of Responsible Staff
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
No person-centred care
Nurse Attendance at Clinical Interactions
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
No person-centred care
Parental Knowledge in Care Plans
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
No person-centred care

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.