Rachel Mortimer
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2024-0036
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 16 Mar 2024
Sent To
Response Status
Responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
16 Mar 2024
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner’s Concerns
1. Following concerned calls by family no advice was provided on what options were available to them if they were concerned for their family members safety and no provision of services that could be called to discuss her mental state.
2. Despite identifying the risk of emotional dysregulation and that BSARCS would mitigate this risk. When IHCBTT were informed BSARC was not available no further consideration was given to any other service to minimise the risk.
2. Despite identifying the risk of emotional dysregulation and that BSARCS would mitigate this risk. When IHCBTT were informed BSARC was not available no further consideration was given to any other service to minimise the risk.
Responses
The Trust will share the coroner's concerns with all Barnsley IHBTT practitioners to emphasize referring to resource packs for advising families on support services. It has also agreed that if a BSARC referral is declined, the IHBTT will reconsider advice and review treatment plans for further risk mitigations, embedding this into team practice.
AI summary
View full response
Dear Ma’am, Regulation 28 Response – Rachel Mortimer We write in response to the Regulation 28 report following the inquest touching the death of Ms Rachel Mortimer. We would like to start this response by offering Ms Mortimer’s family our sincere condolences for their loss. We hope the information supplied in this response provides assurance that the Trust has carefully considered, and appropriate actions will be taken in response to these. We will take each concern in turn below.
1. Following concerned calls by family no advice was provided on what options were available to them if they were concerned for their family members safety and no provision of services that could be called to discuss her mental state.
Practitioners in the Barnsley Intensive Home-Based Treatment Team (IHBTT) have access to a resource pack with comprehensive and up to date information regarding local mental health support services for people in psychological distress, which may not require a secondary care mental health response.
Your concern will be shared with all practitioners in Barnsley IHBTT through team meetings and email communication. This will include an emphasis on the importance of practitioners always referring to the resource pack, to ensure the most appropriate advice is provided to service users and their families about how to access support at all times should they have concerns about their loved one’s safety and wellbeing.
2. Despite identifying the risk of emotional dysregulation and that BSARCS would mitigate this risk. When IHBTT were informed BSARC was not available no further consideration was given to any other service to minimise the risk.
Following receipt of your concern, it has been agreed that where the Barnsley IHBTT are informed that an onward referral has been declined by Barnsley Sexual Abuse and Rape Crisis Service (BSARC), the service will reconsider the suitability of the advice they have given to service users and families and review any proposed treatment plans to consider whether further risk mitigations or interventions are required to support the service user. This requirement will be embedded into team practice and communicated to all practitioners through team meetings and email communication.
I do hope the above information is of assistance and answers the concerns raised within your Regulation 28 report following the sad death of Ms Rachel Mortimer.
1. Following concerned calls by family no advice was provided on what options were available to them if they were concerned for their family members safety and no provision of services that could be called to discuss her mental state.
Practitioners in the Barnsley Intensive Home-Based Treatment Team (IHBTT) have access to a resource pack with comprehensive and up to date information regarding local mental health support services for people in psychological distress, which may not require a secondary care mental health response.
Your concern will be shared with all practitioners in Barnsley IHBTT through team meetings and email communication. This will include an emphasis on the importance of practitioners always referring to the resource pack, to ensure the most appropriate advice is provided to service users and their families about how to access support at all times should they have concerns about their loved one’s safety and wellbeing.
2. Despite identifying the risk of emotional dysregulation and that BSARCS would mitigate this risk. When IHBTT were informed BSARC was not available no further consideration was given to any other service to minimise the risk.
Following receipt of your concern, it has been agreed that where the Barnsley IHBTT are informed that an onward referral has been declined by Barnsley Sexual Abuse and Rape Crisis Service (BSARC), the service will reconsider the suitability of the advice they have given to service users and families and review any proposed treatment plans to consider whether further risk mitigations or interventions are required to support the service user. This requirement will be embedded into team practice and communicated to all practitioners through team meetings and email communication.
I do hope the above information is of assistance and answers the concerns raised within your Regulation 28 report following the sad death of Ms Rachel Mortimer.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 10 July 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Rachel Louise MORTIMER. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 12 January 2024. The conclusion of the inquest was suicide. The medical cause of death was: 1a Hanging in the context of cocaine and alcohol usage 1b 1c II
Circumstances of the Death
On 25 June 2023 Rachel Mortimer took her own life . She was found by her son in her garden hanging .
In December 2022 Rachel Mortimer took an overdose of . A Mental health act assessment was undertaken but she was not deemed to require sectioning at this time. On 18 June 2023 Rachel was seen by the Mental Health Liaison Team (MHLT) at Barnsley Hospital after taking an overdose of prescribed and trying to hang herself. She said she had been having suicidal thoughts for a long time, she did not regret her actions and that thoughts of her family did not stop her. She was assessed by the MHLT as having risk of future impulsive self harm and suicide when using alcohol and risk of further deterioration of her mental state without timely appropriate mental health support to develop coping skills. She was referred to IHBTT and was discharged from hospital. No MHA assessment was undertaken.
She was seen by IHBTT and her risks of emotional dysregulation without engaging in therapy and risk of harmful alcohol use were identified. She was to be referred to BSARCS and told to refer herself to recovery services as mitigation. She was assessed as low risk of suicide even though she had initially stated she was not regretful of what done and disappointed that she had not died, she was assessed as not having current suicidal thoughts or intentions of suicide and wanted to engage in therapy. She was provided with contact numbers to call if she wanted to discuss her mental health at any time.
Unfortunately, whilst she was referred to BSARCS she was not accepted. Despite this being a risk factor no other mitigation was offered at this time and therefore the risk was not mitigated.
On 21 June at 4pm IBHTT Rachel’s mother contacted IHBTT with concerns, she was told that Rachel should contact the GP for access to services and that they could not provide any information due to data protection. At no point was Mrs Mortimer provided any information on what to do if she was concerned for Rachels safety such as taking her to ED or that Rachel could contact certain mental health services to discuss her feelings in a crisis. A further call was made at 5.30pm, an hour and a half later, by Rachel’s son, who expressed concerns that she was expressing suicidal ideas, again no signposting was given. A further call was made on the same day by paramedics with concerns and again they were told that she had been advised to contact her GP. No signposting was provided or consideration given to the fact previously identified risks which had not been mitigated and she was drinking which had been identified as having a risk of future impulsive self harm and suicide.
Despite these 3 contacts by family and paramedics, at no point was any safety netting in terms of the options available if they were concerned provided, such as to take her to ED or for her to call any mental health services given. A phone call was made that evening to Rachel but as Police were with her she was unable to discuss and asked for a call back later which was not answered.
IHBTT discussed Rachel on 22 June 2023 and decided she should be called for a review of her mental state and risks and to offer secondary mental health follow up. 7 telephone calls were made between 22 and 26 June with no success. IHBTT knowing that she had had 2 previous suicide attempts, had risk factors that had not been mitigated and had recently been contacted on by family with significant concerns that she was suicidal the IHBTT treatment team took no further action and on 26 June, with no contact, assessed her as low risk due to lack of contact. .
In December 2022 Rachel Mortimer took an overdose of . A Mental health act assessment was undertaken but she was not deemed to require sectioning at this time. On 18 June 2023 Rachel was seen by the Mental Health Liaison Team (MHLT) at Barnsley Hospital after taking an overdose of prescribed and trying to hang herself. She said she had been having suicidal thoughts for a long time, she did not regret her actions and that thoughts of her family did not stop her. She was assessed by the MHLT as having risk of future impulsive self harm and suicide when using alcohol and risk of further deterioration of her mental state without timely appropriate mental health support to develop coping skills. She was referred to IHBTT and was discharged from hospital. No MHA assessment was undertaken.
She was seen by IHBTT and her risks of emotional dysregulation without engaging in therapy and risk of harmful alcohol use were identified. She was to be referred to BSARCS and told to refer herself to recovery services as mitigation. She was assessed as low risk of suicide even though she had initially stated she was not regretful of what done and disappointed that she had not died, she was assessed as not having current suicidal thoughts or intentions of suicide and wanted to engage in therapy. She was provided with contact numbers to call if she wanted to discuss her mental health at any time.
Unfortunately, whilst she was referred to BSARCS she was not accepted. Despite this being a risk factor no other mitigation was offered at this time and therefore the risk was not mitigated.
On 21 June at 4pm IBHTT Rachel’s mother contacted IHBTT with concerns, she was told that Rachel should contact the GP for access to services and that they could not provide any information due to data protection. At no point was Mrs Mortimer provided any information on what to do if she was concerned for Rachels safety such as taking her to ED or that Rachel could contact certain mental health services to discuss her feelings in a crisis. A further call was made at 5.30pm, an hour and a half later, by Rachel’s son, who expressed concerns that she was expressing suicidal ideas, again no signposting was given. A further call was made on the same day by paramedics with concerns and again they were told that she had been advised to contact her GP. No signposting was provided or consideration given to the fact previously identified risks which had not been mitigated and she was drinking which had been identified as having a risk of future impulsive self harm and suicide.
Despite these 3 contacts by family and paramedics, at no point was any safety netting in terms of the options available if they were concerned provided, such as to take her to ED or for her to call any mental health services given. A phone call was made that evening to Rachel but as Police were with her she was unable to discuss and asked for a call back later which was not answered.
IHBTT discussed Rachel on 22 June 2023 and decided she should be called for a review of her mental state and risks and to offer secondary mental health follow up. 7 telephone calls were made between 22 and 26 June with no success. IHBTT knowing that she had had 2 previous suicide attempts, had risk factors that had not been mitigated and had recently been contacted on by family with significant concerns that she was suicidal the IHBTT treatment team took no further action and on 26 June, with no contact, assessed her as low risk due to lack of contact. .
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Independent review of use of force on mentally ill detainees
Brook House Inquiry
Mental health access for alcohol addiction
Computerise system for managing missing persons and casualty information
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Emergency family notification
Extend computerisation to all police forces for shared information access
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Emergency family notification
Establish common telephone numbers for public major incident information
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Emergency family notification
Review railway emergency planning, including survivor after-care and bereaved support
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Emergency family notification
Ensure readily available designated and trained Family Liaison Officers at local level
Macpherson Inquiry
Emergency family notification
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.