Elise Walsh

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2024-0467
Date of Report 22 August 2024
Coroner Andrew Hetherington
Coroner Area Northumberland
Response Deadline est. 17 October 2024
All 1 response received · Deadline: 17 Oct 2024
Response Status
Responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 17 Oct 2024
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroner's Concerns
The deceased attended an appointment at St George's Park Hospital on the 12 February 2022. After the appointment she was waiting for a taxi, walking up and down the corridor and appeared to be getting more agitated. She was not with how her appointment went and voiced those concerns verbally. When the taxi arrived, she refused to in and the taxi left. She remained at reception where she voiced her anger at Crisis Team and requested Complaints Form: describe it as a note of intent and do not repeat its content: It is not referred to in any witness statements, it is not referred to in the Serious Incident Investigation_ heard it was discussed at the After Action Review but it has not made its way through to the Serious Incident Investigation. It was disclosed to my office on Friday 16 August 2024 and of greater concern from happy get the the family were not aware of its existence. am concerned this significant information was not made available much earlier Iam told the administrative staff do not read complaint forms and it is the process that complaint forms are placed in an envelope without read or considered and are sent straight to another hospital: However it appears as part of the triage the envelope containing the complaint form is opened at that hospital by a mixture of administrative staff and clinical staff. am concerned that important information from a patient could be missed and there could also be a significant delay in administering treatment or intervention:
Responses
Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust
11 Oct 2024
The Trust has redesigned investigation templates and reminded staff to ensure all issues are included in reports. They have also added an urgent advice note to complaint forms and implemented a system for reception staff to call for immediate clinical support when concerns about a patient arise. AI summary
View full response
Dear Sir

Inquest touching the death of Elise Walsh

We write to formally respond to your Prevention of Future Deaths (PFD) Report, dated 22 August 2024, following the sad death of Miss Elise Walsh.

At the outset we would like to again apologise to you and Elise's family that the existence of the note which Elise wrote prior to her death was not disclosed to your office sooner and did not form part of the Serious Incident Investigation. The note was discussed as part of the After Action Review, which should have then translated into the Serious Incident Report. Unfortunately the Investigating Officer involved in this matter has left the Trust and we have been unable to ascertain why this was not included in the Serious Incident Report.

The Trust now carry out internal investigations in accordance with PSIRF (Patient Safety Incident Response Framework). In line with PSIRF CNTW’s review templates have been redesigned to ensure that identified issues / key lines of enquiry are carried forward and are not lost when a review progresses to a full Patient Safety Incident Investigation. Following on from the Inquest the Head of Clinical Risk and Investigations has spoken with the Trusts dedicated Investigating Officers to remind them that whenever an issue is raised as part of discussion during an incident review process it is then explored further and addressed in the completed report.

In relation to your concerns around the Trust's complaints process, I can confirm that the Trust have a robust system in place. The Trust has a central complaints team based at St Nicholas Hospital in Gosforth. All complaints are sent here to be logged on a database and triaged centrally. These are opened by trained staff and triaged by senior staff in the Safer Care Directorate. Whilst staff who open the complaints are not clinical, they are trained to review and immediately escalate any concerns to clinicians. Equally at the point of triage, staff are able to escalate any concerns to relevant teams, such as the Crisis Team or Community Treatment Team. Ordinarily complaints received by post are opened and scanned / logged on the system the same day and triaged within 48 hours. Following the Inquest the Trust have added a note to the complaints form that reads, Please be aware your complaint/concern will not be reviewed until it reaches the centralised complaints department. If you need to speak to someone more urgently then please inform a member of staff or call our crisis team on either 111 (selecting option
2) or 0191 814 8899. This change has been communicated to all Trust staff via a CAS (safety) alert.

As you heard at the Inquest, owing to confidentiality issues it is unfortunately not possible to implement a process across the Trust, whereby any complaint forms which are handed to receptionists are opened and immediately triaged. Following the inquest this matter has been discussed at the Trust Wide Patient Safety Learning and Improvement Panel (PSLIP) and unfortunately it has not been possible to identify a different system which would allow for such urgent reviews, however the PSLIP panel did request the above addition to the complaints form. As

2

explained at the Inquest, the Trust have however, implemented a system whereby if reception staff have concerns about a patient, they can call for support and a clinician will attend to support the reception staff until such concerns are resolved. If during this period of support the patient writes things down, then clinicians can make a decision as to whether or not it is appropriate to review what they have written, enabling them to act upon the contents if indicated.

We hope that the above addressed your concerns.
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action_
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
I commenced an investigation into the death of Elise Walsh Deceased. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 20 August 2024. The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative conclusion: The deceased died after] Jon 12 February 2022. The act was deliberate on her part intending the result to end her life. She suffered severe hypoxic brain injury which left her severely debilitated and died on 7 June 2023. The cause of death was: Ia Aspiration pneumonia 1b Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy secondary to hanging being
Circumstances of the Death
The deceased had a history of self-harm and suicidal ideation: On 28 January 2022 she approached police and expressed suicidal ideation. She was seen by the Psychiatric Liaison Service and referred to the Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team: She voluntarily attended appointments at St George's Park Hospital for home treatment with transport to and appointments provided by taxi. She attended an appointment at St George's Park Hospital on the 12 February 2022. She entered the waiting area toilets and after approximately 16 minutes staff entered and found she had CPR was commenced and she was conveyed to the Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne where it was identified she had sustained a severe hypoxic brain injury which left her severely debilitated bedbound, non-verbal and was fed via a percutaneous gastrostomy tube She was a resident at Heatherfield Care Home and dependent on staff for all her needs. She became unwell on 4 June 2023 having developed aspiration pneumonia and was admitted Northumbria Specialist Emergency Care Hospital, Cramlington where she died on 7 June 2023.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Documentation of technical adviser advice
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
No open learning culture Complaint record keeping failures
Learning and information from complaints
Mid Staffs Inquiry
No open learning culture Complaint record keeping failures
Learning and information from complaints
Mid Staffs Inquiry
No open learning culture Complaint record keeping failures
Standard form for derogations from guidance
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
No open learning culture
Protocol for duty to assist referrals
Cranston Inquiry
Complaint record keeping failures
Training on normalcy bias
Cranston Inquiry
No open learning culture
London Fire Brigade to establish lessons learned process
Grenfell Tower Inquiry
No open learning culture
Quarterly auditing of Rule 40 and Rule 42 use
Brook House Inquiry
Complaint record keeping failures
Update healthcare complaints handling guidance
Brook House Inquiry
Complaint record keeping failures
Ensure Home Office staff presence and visibility in IRCs
Brook House Inquiry
No open learning culture

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.