Brenda Morris
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2016-0065
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 15 Apr 2016
Sent To
Response Status
Responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
15 Apr 2016
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner’s Concerns
1. Brenda Morris was allowed weekend leave on the basis that her partner was at home to keep an eye on her, but no member of staff told him this. This was not a situation where she needed 24 hour supervision Nevertheless, it would have been helpful for him to know the basis for the leave, because he would then have modified his own behaviour accordingly.
2. The weekend before the weekend of her death, Ms Morris’s partner felt that she had not been well during the weekend leave. I appreciate that care must be taken not to override a patient’s autonomy, but it might be useful for staff routinely to consider whether they are able to obtain feedback from family members after such leave.
3. There appears to be confusion about whether a doctor is needed to authorise unplanned leave of an informal patient (not relevant in this case because the leave had already been authorised). Your serious incident review of this matter indicates that this is necessary, but I heard evidence that such medical authorisation is not routinely sought.
4. Substandard documentation in the nursing records had already been identified before the inquest by your serious incident review. Without improvement in the records, it is not possible to determine whether and if so by whom a necessary risk assessment is undertaken, e.g. immediately before weekend leave is taken.
2. The weekend before the weekend of her death, Ms Morris’s partner felt that she had not been well during the weekend leave. I appreciate that care must be taken not to override a patient’s autonomy, but it might be useful for staff routinely to consider whether they are able to obtain feedback from family members after such leave.
3. There appears to be confusion about whether a doctor is needed to authorise unplanned leave of an informal patient (not relevant in this case because the leave had already been authorised). Your serious incident review of this matter indicates that this is necessary, but I heard evidence that such medical authorisation is not routinely sought.
4. Substandard documentation in the nursing records had already been identified before the inquest by your serious incident review. Without improvement in the records, it is not possible to determine whether and if so by whom a necessary risk assessment is undertaken, e.g. immediately before weekend leave is taken.
Responses
Response received
View full response
Dear Madam Inquest touching upon the death of Brenda Morris This is a formal response to your Regulation 28 Report dated 19/h February in which you set out your concerns relating to the care Ms Morris received from East London NHS Foundation Trust Your concerns related to the provision of leave for informal patients. You were specifically concerned at the lack of information provided to Ms Morris' partner in relation to her home leave and his role in facilitating that leave_ You were also concerned that staff had not engaged with Ms Morris' partner on her return from leave to obtain feedback You also highlighted in your report that there appeared to be confusion over whether a doctor was required to authorise unplanned leave for an informal patient: This concern stemmed from the evidence given by the ward manager during the Inquest in conflict with that detailed in the Trust's Serious Incident Review: You also comment on the issue of substandard documentation in the nursing records, noting that this had already been identified by the Trust prior to the Inquest, noting that without improvement in the records it is not possible to determine whether and if s0 by whom a necessary risk assessment is undertaken immediately before leave is taken. can confirm that the information contained in the Trust's Serious Incident Review is correct in stating that a doctor is required to authorise unplanned leave for an informal patient. was concerned to hear the evidence of the ward manager that a doctor is not required to authorise unplanned leave and that this is not routinely requested. Having heard the evidence of the ward manager at the Inquest investigated this issue on my return: was able to establish that the understanding of this particular ward manager was not in line with the general understanding of our nursing staff: Chief Executive: Dr Robert Dolan May : being
However, in light of the importance of this issue the Trust has taken the decision to implement the use of template documentation t0 ensure that any leave has been appropriately agreed by a doctor: A new 'Informal patient leave agreement' has been developed: This document details the agreement of leave following assessment by a doctor: The template includes a box detailing any leave conditions along with any expectations from staff, patients, relatives and carers: A separate box deals with contingency plans. The agreement is then signed by the doctor, the patient and the relative: This document is expected to be in place before a patient goes on leave. In addition to the above an 'In-patient leave checklist for informal and detained patients' has been developed: It is also a requirement for this checklist to be completed for all leave. The checklist requires staff to assess risk prior to any period of leave, discuss with family or friends issues of risk and provide relativeslcarers with a copy of an individualised contingency care plan: On return from leave staff will need to confirm that have obtained feedback from family on the patient's return from leave_ The detail of all assessments and discussions will be documented on RIO_ When implementing these new templates it is of the utmost important that the Trust strikes the right balance between appropriate risk assessment and ensuring that informal patients are able t0 exercise their right t0 make decisions in respect of leave and that we work in line with the views of the CQC that there should be no blanket restrictions on leave for informal patients_ Both forms are currently being piloted on one of our Mental Health Care for Older Persons wards with the aim of full introduction across all of our Older Persons wards by the end of this month: Use of the forms and the corresponding RIO entries will be the subject to quarterly audits starting from the end of 2016 until January 2017 and will be subject to further review thereafter if necessary: fully anticipate that the implementation of these changes will ensure that all patients, whether formal or informal, will be subject to appropriate assessment prior to any period of leave and again on their return. that the actions taken by the Trust in response to your concerns will provide you with appropriate reassurance. If you require any further information please do not hesitate to contact me.
However, in light of the importance of this issue the Trust has taken the decision to implement the use of template documentation t0 ensure that any leave has been appropriately agreed by a doctor: A new 'Informal patient leave agreement' has been developed: This document details the agreement of leave following assessment by a doctor: The template includes a box detailing any leave conditions along with any expectations from staff, patients, relatives and carers: A separate box deals with contingency plans. The agreement is then signed by the doctor, the patient and the relative: This document is expected to be in place before a patient goes on leave. In addition to the above an 'In-patient leave checklist for informal and detained patients' has been developed: It is also a requirement for this checklist to be completed for all leave. The checklist requires staff to assess risk prior to any period of leave, discuss with family or friends issues of risk and provide relativeslcarers with a copy of an individualised contingency care plan: On return from leave staff will need to confirm that have obtained feedback from family on the patient's return from leave_ The detail of all assessments and discussions will be documented on RIO_ When implementing these new templates it is of the utmost important that the Trust strikes the right balance between appropriate risk assessment and ensuring that informal patients are able t0 exercise their right t0 make decisions in respect of leave and that we work in line with the views of the CQC that there should be no blanket restrictions on leave for informal patients_ Both forms are currently being piloted on one of our Mental Health Care for Older Persons wards with the aim of full introduction across all of our Older Persons wards by the end of this month: Use of the forms and the corresponding RIO entries will be the subject to quarterly audits starting from the end of 2016 until January 2017 and will be subject to further review thereafter if necessary: fully anticipate that the implementation of these changes will ensure that all patients, whether formal or informal, will be subject to appropriate assessment prior to any period of leave and again on their return. that the actions taken by the Trust in response to your concerns will provide you with appropriate reassurance. If you require any further information please do not hesitate to contact me.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 22 July 2015 I commenced an investigation into the death of Brenda Elizabeth Morris, aged 66 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest yesterday. I made a determination of suicide, when Ms Morris drowned herself in the bath at home.
Circumstances of the Death
Approximately three weeks before she died, Ms Morris took an excess of Oramorph and was taken to hospital. She then went to see her general practitioner, who was extremely concerned and arranged for immediate referral to the mental health services. Ms Morris was admitted to Larch Lodge, where she was treated as an informal patient. She was given weekend leave in mid July and again on Sunday, 19 July, the day before she died.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Improve perinatal mortality recording
Morecambe Bay Investigation
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Detainee Capture and Condition Records
Al-Sweady Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.