Michael Roberts

PFD Report Historic (No Identified Response) Ref: 2023-0056Deceased
Date of Report 13 February 2023
Coroner Mary Hassell
Response Deadline est. 10 April 2023
No published response · Over 2 years old
Response Status
Responses 0 of 3
56-Day Deadline 10 Apr 2023
Over 2 years old — no identified published response
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroner’s Concerns
Before he was employed as a proof assistant testing new guns, Mr Roberts’ prospective employer asked for a DBS (Disclosure and Barring Service) certificate. This was provided and recorded no convictions, cautions, reprimands or warnings.

However, Mr Roberts had in the past been convicted of a violent offence for which he had received a custodial sentence. This was the reason for his dismissal from his former occupation as a police officer in the MPS (Metropolitan Police Service).

If Mr Roberts’ DBS certificate had correctly recorded his conviction, he would not have been employed at Proof House where he had access to firearms.

It is unclear to me whether the inaccuracy of the DBS certificate was caused by an error made by the DBS or by the MPS.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 30 August 2022, one of my assistant coroners, Jonathan Stevens, commenced an investigation into the death of Michael Roberts aged 50 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 7 February 2023. I made a determination at inquest of suicide.
Circumstances of the Death
Mr Roberts shot himself on the evening of Saturday, 20 August 2022, using a gun he took from his place of work. He did not own any guns.

He was alone and made no attempt to shoot any other person. However, he had suggested to his partner that he could kill her.
Copies Sent To
, fiancée of Michael Roberts , proof master, Proof House, London , proof master, Proof House, Birmingham
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Enact Socio-economic Duty
COVID-19 Inquiry
Police Vetting Inconsistencies
Criminal record checks compliance
Fuller Inquiry
Police Vetting Inconsistencies
Vetting Code compliance for officer transfers
Angiolini Inquiry
Police Vetting Inconsistencies
Strengthen information-sharing practices
Angiolini Inquiry
Police Vetting Inconsistencies
Officers held to higher standard with fettered privacy rights
Angiolini Inquiry
Police Vetting Inconsistencies
Stronger vetting aftercare and randomised re-vetting
Angiolini Inquiry
Police Vetting Inconsistencies
Remove barriers to reporting sexual offences by colleagues
Angiolini Inquiry
Police Vetting Inconsistencies
Improve conditions for female officers
Angiolini Inquiry
Police Vetting Inconsistencies
Review sexual offence allegations against serving officers
Angiolini Inquiry
Police Vetting Inconsistencies
In-person interviews and home visits for police candidates
Angiolini Inquiry
Police Vetting Inconsistencies

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.