Eric Matthews
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2014-0151
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 30 May 2014
Response Status
Responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
30 May 2014
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner’S Concerns
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. (1) There appears to be a body of evidence that positional asphyxia can occur through use of baby slings. However, knowledge of this risk appears to be limited at present to academic circles and has not been widely researched. (2) If there is currently sufficient evidence to raise this risk to parents, I am concerned that this information has not been publicised more widely.
Responses
Response received
View full response
Dear Sir
Although a couple of years ago I did investigate the possibility of doing a survey of ‘cot deaths’ in unusual scenarios such as slings and car seats, it did not prove feasible due to data protection and consent issues.
These events are very rare: among perinatal pathologists nobody had seen more than one or two (verbal communications). Because they are all Coroner cases, the pathologists could not supply any further data without the consent of each individual coroner, often going back several years. The data exists, in the form of the child death reports, but these are not available as a research resource, and the data is held locally and not collated.
Being so rare, any prospective collection of data would take many years, and further infants would die.
The way forward may be for the coroners to liaise with clinicians who are working on sudden infant death (ideally via FSIDS), and release whatever data is available from existing child death reviews.
Since the ‘back to sleep’ campaign, a subset of SUDI have been considered very likely to have been asphyxial – more investigation revealed that these are often associated with additional risk factors (e.g. sharing a sofa with a parent). What a review of deaths in slings and car seats might do is identify possible additional risk factors, such as the age of the baby or the design of the sling. Being so rare, no useful conclusions could be reached from the experience of one centre, even a very large one.
All we can say at present is that (very rarely) babies have died in carrying slings, and the information reaches the public via local inquest reports and the newspapers. Any progress would have to come from examination of child death review data. FSID is very interested in setting up a child death register for this reason, but is hampered by the same legal and consent issues as I was.
There is clearly scope for further work, but this is very peripheral to my own professional interests and experience. I was trying to match people up, but was never in a position to run my own study. The chief executive at FSID was certainly interested, but I don’t know how much progress she has been able to make. I’m happy to talk on the phone about this if you want to discuss matters further.
Although a couple of years ago I did investigate the possibility of doing a survey of ‘cot deaths’ in unusual scenarios such as slings and car seats, it did not prove feasible due to data protection and consent issues.
These events are very rare: among perinatal pathologists nobody had seen more than one or two (verbal communications). Because they are all Coroner cases, the pathologists could not supply any further data without the consent of each individual coroner, often going back several years. The data exists, in the form of the child death reports, but these are not available as a research resource, and the data is held locally and not collated.
Being so rare, any prospective collection of data would take many years, and further infants would die.
The way forward may be for the coroners to liaise with clinicians who are working on sudden infant death (ideally via FSIDS), and release whatever data is available from existing child death reviews.
Since the ‘back to sleep’ campaign, a subset of SUDI have been considered very likely to have been asphyxial – more investigation revealed that these are often associated with additional risk factors (e.g. sharing a sofa with a parent). What a review of deaths in slings and car seats might do is identify possible additional risk factors, such as the age of the baby or the design of the sling. Being so rare, no useful conclusions could be reached from the experience of one centre, even a very large one.
All we can say at present is that (very rarely) babies have died in carrying slings, and the information reaches the public via local inquest reports and the newspapers. Any progress would have to come from examination of child death review data. FSID is very interested in setting up a child death register for this reason, but is hampered by the same legal and consent issues as I was.
There is clearly scope for further work, but this is very peripheral to my own professional interests and experience. I was trying to match people up, but was never in a position to run my own study. The chief executive at FSID was certainly interested, but I don’t know how much progress she has been able to make. I’m happy to talk on the phone about this if you want to discuss matters further.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
The investigation into the death of Eric Laser Matthews, aged 1 month, was commenced on 9 January 2014 and concluded at the end of the inquest on 2 April 2014. The conclusion of the inquest was narrative (Copy attached).
Circumstances of the Death
Eric Matthews was born on 26 November 2013. He was discharged home after a course of antibiotics, which was required for presumed sepsis. Over the next month he was well and no further issues of concern arose. On 24 December 2013 his parents placed him in a ‘sling’ baby carrier in order to comfort him during a period of crying. He appeared to settle during a short walk, however, on their return home it was clear that Eric was not breathing. Resuscitation was started and the ambulance service called. After a period of approximately 39 minutes, sufficient circulation returned so that resuscitation could be stopped. Eric was ultimately transferred to Great Ormond Street Hospital where, despite further treatment, he was found to have suffered a significant hypoxic injury to his brain. Treatment was discontinued and he died on 1 January 2014. Evidence was provided by Paediatric Pathologist, that, on the balance of probabilities, the cause of the cardiac arrest was positional asphyxia. There was no evidence that the use of the sling was inappropriate or incorrect. In her evidence stated that there have been reported cases of infant deaths in similar circumstances, notably in the United States and Australia. She noted that , Perinatal Pathologist at UCLH, is currently collating reports of such cases in the UK, with a view to understanding this risk more thoroughly. Eric’s parents set out that they had no knowledge of the risk of positional asphyxia through use of a baby sling. Eric’s mother noted the valuable work undertaken by the Lullaby Trust, with regard to the provision of information to parents relating to sleep positioning. She proposed that the Trust might be well placed to distribute similar information regarding sling use.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
London Fire Brigade to establish lessons learned process
Grenfell Tower Inquiry
No open learning culture
Ensure Home Office staff presence and visibility in IRCs
Brook House Inquiry
No open learning culture
Review international practice on medics with firearms officers
Manchester Arena Inquiry
No open learning culture
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.