Amy Pugh

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2026-0013
Date of Report 1 December 2025
Coroner Paul Marks
Response Deadline ✓ from report 9 March 2026
All 1 response received · Deadline: 9 Mar 2026
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Clinical staff could not access important mental health records from partner institutions, compromising the patient's assessment and subsequent management.
View full coroner's concerns
Following Amy’s admission to Avondale Unit on 8th April 2024, clinical staff were unable to access important records pertaining to Amy’s mental health from partner NHS mental health institutions and this compromised her assessment and subsequent management. The approved findings of fact are attached.
Responses
NHS England NHS / Health Body
12 Jan 2026
Noted
NHS England acknowledges the concerns raised and explains its commitment to improving Electronic Patient Records (EPRs) across all NHS Trusts and supporting the sharing of critical clinical information across NHS organisations. It highlights ongoing national work to address Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Coroner, Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Amy Grace Pugh who died on 11th April 2024.

Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 12th January 2026 concerning the death of Amy Grace Pugh on 11th April 2024. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my deep condolences to Amy’s family and loved ones. NHS England is keen to assure the family and yourself that the concerns raised about Amy’s care have been listened to and reflected upon.

Your Report raised concerns that clinical staff at the Avondale Unit in Hull (falling under the Humber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust) were unable to access important records pertaining to Amy’s mental health from partner NHS mental health institutions, which compromised her assessment and subsequent management.

NHS England is committed to improving the maturity and quality of Electronic Patient Records (EPRs) across all NHS Trusts. NHS England has provided funding to ensure all NHS Trusts have an EPR implemented. It is, however, up to individual NHS Trusts to effectively procure and implement their chosen EPR system, and to agree and progress any convergence of EPR systems within their local systems.

NHS England is also committed to supporting the sharing of critical clinical information across NHS organisations. Historically, different care settings have adopted different clinical systems to maintain a clinical record; some areas have adopted the same electronic patient record (other areas have adopted shared care records which can provide access to records from different care settings).

I have been advised by NHS England’s Frontline Digitisation Team that the Humber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust (formerly Humber NHS Mental Health Trust) reported that it had completed procurement to implement TPP SystmOne as a single, integrated EPR solution across both physical and mental health services within the Trust. The implementation was reported as successfully completed in 2025; prior to this the Trust had been using a different EPR system known as Lorenzo since 2012.

National Medical Director NHS England Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG

2nd March 2026

I am also advised that the Humber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust are connected to the Yorkshire and Humber Shared Care Record (YHCR) which should enable the sharing of patient information across the region. All staff at the Trust have access to the YHCR. GP Connect, which is accessible via the YHCR, provides information from Primary Care providers.

In addition, the National Care Records Service (NCRS) enables access to the patient’s Summary Care Record (SCR), which was accessible by the Trust through Lorenzo in 2024 and through TPP SystmOne since 2025. In the event that the patient is not able to provide ‘Permission to View’ their SCR, an emergency access option is available to clinicians. Additional information is also available on the SCR which may include further medical information.

The newly published Fit for the future: 10 Year Health Plan for England sets out the government’s plan for healthcare in England over the next 10 years. The plan sets out a commitment to give patients ‘a single, secure and authoritative account of their data
– a single patient record – to enable more coordinated, personalised and predictive care.’

NHS England is aware of the challenge in sharing medical records between providers and the variability between areas using different technologies. We are also aware that use of the SCR is variable across different care settings. We are therefore working across the health system to support greater integration and awareness of record sharing between providers. We are also working with the SCR Programme to support wider access to relevant patient information.

NHS England recognises the critical importance of improving data sharing between NHS organisations to support coordinated patient care. The 10 Year Plan commits to harnessing the digital revolution to enable more coordinated, personalised and predictive care. The Medium-Term Planning Framework (2026/27 to 2028/29) reinforces this ambition, with services becoming digital by default and integrated neighbourhood teams having access to digital tools and shared care records. This shift towards interoperable technology will support better communication and information sharing between NHS providers, helping to ensure safer, more joined up care for patients.

I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Amy, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Sent To
  • NHS England
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 9 Mar 2026
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 23rd July 2024, I commenced an investigation into the death of Amy Grace Pugh, aged 23 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 26th November 2025, the narrative conclusion of the inquest was:-

Amy Grace Pugh took an overdose of and other drugs around midnight on 10th April 2024 which resulted in her death on the morning of 11th April 2024. Whilst it is certain she took the drugs, it is not possible to discern her intent.
Circumstances of the Death
Amy Grace Pugh had a complex psychiatric history comprising emotionally unstable personality disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, anxiety and depression as well as drug and substance misuse. She had a proclivity to self-harm and taking overdoses of medication. She received a custodial sentence of 18 months imprisonment which she served at HMP Low Newton and was released on 27th March 2024. Whilst in prison two Assessments, Care in Custody and Teamwork (ACCT) were opened and subsequently closed. The ACCT's were opened due to self-harming behaviour whilst in custody. On her release she was inadequately supported by various agencies and the combination of this lack of support resulted in the recurrence of self-harming behaviour and a serious deterioration in her mental health, which had been stable during the latter part of her incarceration. Two hospital attendances resulted from applying a ligature to her neck and later the same day, 3rd April 2024, from a combined overdose of medication and consumption of alcohol. She required elective ventilation in the intensive care unit of Scunthorpe Hospital until the effects of alcohol and drugs had passed off. On regaining consciousness on 5th April 2024, she displayed psychotic symptoms and was detained under 5(2) of The Mental Health Act 1983. Despite this, she absconded from hospital but was returned the same day. She underwent a mental health assessment on 8th April 2024 which resulted in her informal admission to Avondale Unit in Hull. She obtained leave on 10th April 2024 to visit her twin sister in York. Whilst in the company of her sister, she appropriated her sister's drugs which comprised pregabalin, diazepam, gabapentin, codeine and propranolol. She returned as scheduled to the Avondale Unit on 10th April and queries were raised around 21:00 hours that she might be intoxicated. She denied this. At 22:00 hours she collapsed in the garden of the facility and lost consciousness but recovered after about 2 minutes. Paramedics were called and attended, by which time she was fully conscious with essentially normal vital signs. Out of an abundance of caution, paramedics advised that she should go to hospital to be checked, but Amy refused and the default position was that staff of the Avondale Unit would observe her overnight. Observations were conducted at 01:00 and 02:00 hours visually through a flap in the door of Amy’s bedroom with neither entry into the room or physical examination being carried out. In all the circumstances, this was an inadequate means of assessing Amy. At 03:00 hours, a further observation occurred, this time with entry into Amy's room. She had no pulse, was not breathing and had fixed, dilated pupils. Despite cardiopulmonary resuscitation being carried out, there was no return of spontaneous circulation, and she was declared deceased at 04:13 hours at Hull Royal Infirmary. The aggregation of failings in this case may be considered to have more than minimally, negligibly and trivially resulted in Amy's death.
Action Should Be Taken
This may include, for example, ensuring that medical records systems within the NHS are compatible, can be accessed 24 hours per day by partner organisations and hence permit the data systems to “talk to each other.”
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Need to share information between regulators
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing Inaccessible multi-agency patient information
Response officer access to case information technology
Southport Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Healthcare trust risk information visibility
Southport Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
GMMH and Alder Hey joint SMART audit
Southport Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
National guidance on SMART action points
Southport Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Data Systems for High-Risk Individuals
COVID-19 Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Proportionate Access to Linked Healthcare Records
COVID-19 Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Share Clinical Assessor Advice
Infected Blood Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Simplify External Regulation
Infected Blood Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Safety Management Systems Coordination
Infected Blood Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.