Fahmida Khanam

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2025-0039
Date of Report 22 January 2025
Coroner Kevin McLoughlin
Response Deadline ✓ from report 19 March 2025
All 2 responses received · Deadline: 19 Mar 2025
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
A doctor treated a close relative, breaching the cardinal principle of medical ethics.
View full coroner's concerns
It is NOT suggested that any suspicious conduct has taken place.

The matter is reported as it is understood to be a cardinal principle that a doctor should not treat a close relative.

The following documents accompany this report:

1 Post mortem report dated 15th January 2025

2 My letter to dated 14th November 2024
Responses
Saville Town Medical Centre
28 Jan 2025
Action Planned
The practice will adopt a protocol to ensure GPs do not treat immediate family members, according to GMC guidelines and current Good Medical Practice guidelines. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Katie Thank you for sharing the report. Mrs_ Khanam was registered with Leigh View Medical Practice from 2008 until July 2023. During this time, she had several comorbidities, including uncontrolled asthma; hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3. Being a GP myself; observed that her clinical needs were not adequately met; particularly regarding her uncontrolled asthma and hypertension. Both Mrs Khanam and were registered at Leigh View Medical Practice, but we were dissatisfied with the care provided, which led us to leave the practice and seek care elsewhere Mrs_ Khanam chose to register with Savile Town Medical Centre , where a team of Health care professionals including GPs could share the workload, ensuring better care Mrs_ Khanam also worked as a senior administrator at this practice Prior to joining Savile Town Medical Centre, Mrs. Khanam was seen by a Nurse Practitioner at her former practice; but she expressed dissatisfaction with the care provided. She felt the treatment was inadequate and not aligned with current clinical pathways or NICE guidelines After discussing her concerns with another colleague GP at Savile Town Medical Centre, referred Mrs_ Khanam to a respiratory physician for her uncontrolled asthma something that had not been addressed at her previous practice. Additionally, based on her clinical symptoms, also referred her to an ENT specialist Once she has seen respiratory physician at the hospital, where her treatment management was reviewed with commencing of new medication which resulted her Well control of Asthma. Also, with hypertension management when she was prescribed new medication her blood pressure became well controlled_ Mrs khanum was only issued repeat prescriptions for her Asthma and a couple of referrals to secondary care for treatment management;, as mentioned above. However;, have discussed this with the GP partner and management; on how to avoid this happening in the future The practice is to adopt a protocollprocedure immediately to ensure a GP must not treat immediate family members according to GMC guidelines and current Good Medical Practice guidelines Your Sincerely Address: Saville Town Medical Centre; 786 Scarborough Street Dewsbury West Yorkshire. WF12 9AY again
GMC Regulator / Inspectorate
10 Mar 2025
Noted
The GMC acknowledges the coroner's concerns regarding a doctor treating a close relative, referencing their guidance that this should be avoided where possible but is not explicitly forbidden. They state that they will assess if the individual poses any current and ongoing risk. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mr McLoughlin Thank you for sending the Rule 28 report arising from the investigation into the death of Mrs Fahmida Khanam. May I offer our sincere condolences to the family for their loss. You draw attention to the fact that Mrs Khanam’s husband, , had been treating her. While you concluded that Mrs Khanam died of natural causes and do not suggest any suspicious conduct on the part of , you have referred the matter to us based on your understanding that ‘it is a cardinal principle that a doctor should not treat a close relative’. As the independent statutory regulator of doctors, physician associates (PAs) and anaesthesia associates (AAs) in the UK, our focus is to support good, safe patient care. One of our key functions is to set and maintain the professional standards expected of our registrants. In the introduction to Good Medical Practice, we say: “. . . it isn’t a set of rules. You must use your professional judgement to apply the standards in Good medical practice to your day to day practice. This means working out which of the professional standards are relevant to the specific circumstances you are facing, and using your knowledge, skills and experience to follow them in that context.” On the specific concern that you highlight, in paragraph 97 of that guidance, we say ‘You must, wherever possible, avoid providing medical care to yourself or anyone with whom you have a close personal relationship’. You go on to point registrants to the more detailed guidance on Good practice in proposing, prescribing, providing and managing medicines and devices and in particular paragraphs 66 to 68 regarding record keeping and the issues around prescribing controlled drugs. So, our guidance does not forbid doctors from treating those close to them - there may be circumstances where no other doctor is available, for example when they live in remote rural areas. However, best practice would be to avoid doing so wherever possible because of the potential pitfalls. For example, it may be difficult to be objective when treating a family member (including issuing prescriptions): the family member may feel constrained in being open and honest about their condition. And not every departure from our standards will be considered serious enough to justify action affecting a registrant’s registration and licence to practice.

gmc.uk.org 2

When a concern is raised with us about a registrant, we must assess whether that individual poses any current and ongoing risk in line with our regulatory responsibilities:
• protecting, promoting and maintaining the health, safety and wellbeing of the public
• promoting and maintaining public confidence in the medical professions, and
• promoting and maintaining proper professional standards and conduct for members of those professions. Further information about our processes and the types of action we might need to take can be found on our fitness to practise webpages. Thank you for highlighting this matter with us.
Sent To
  • General Medical Council
Response Status
Linked responses 2 of 1
56-Day Deadline 19 Mar 2025
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 12th November 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of Fahmida Khanam, 74. The investigation concluded on 16th January 2025. The conclusion of the investigation that the death was due to natural causes, specifically:

1a Myocardial infarction

1b Severe coronary artery atheroma

2 Hypertension, asthma, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease
Circumstances of the Death
Mrs Khanam died on 12th November 2024. A post mortem attributed her death to natural causes. It emerged that her husband, had been treating his wife. The Medical Examiner refused to countersign the cause of death put forward by another doctor in ’s practice. This necessitated a post mortem.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Standardised Advance Care Planning
COVID-19 Inquiry
No person-centred care
Patient-focused correspondence
Paterson Inquiry
No person-centred care
Explaining independent sector differences
Paterson Inquiry
No person-centred care
Reflection period for consent
Paterson Inquiry
No person-centred care
Communicating complaint escalation
Paterson Inquiry
No person-centred care
Mandatory independent complaint resolution
Paterson Inquiry
No person-centred care
Age-Appropriate Hospital Settings
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
No person-centred care
Bedside Display of Responsible Staff
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
No person-centred care
Nurse Attendance at Clinical Interactions
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
No person-centred care
Parental Knowledge in Care Plans
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
No person-centred care

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.