Andrew Lewis
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2024-0697
All 2 responses received
· Deadline: 13 Feb 2025
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Systemic and prolonged ambulance service capacity issues, coupled with extensive hospital handover delays, led to extreme response times, with national concerns about oversight and unaddressed PFD reports.
View full coroner's concerns
Facts of this case An ambulance resource arrived around 10 hours from Andrew’s first call (to 111 services), and 8 ½ hours after the ambulance service categorised this as a call requiring attendance within 2 hours. South Central Ambulance Service generally The NHS has a framework called OPEL (Operational Pressures Escalation Level), designed to manage capacity at times of excess demand. SCAS’ version of this is called REAP (Resource Escalation Action Plan). The levels are: REAP level 1 – Steady state. REAP level 2 – Moderate pressure. REAP level 3 – Major pressure. REAP level 4 – Extreme pressure. There are also categories for critical incidents and major incidents. I obtained information from South Central Ambulance Service about their escalation levels in the last 2 years. The specific data can be provided, but the headlines (for the period 3rd of August 2022 to 9th of October 2024) are: SCAS has been at REAP 3 or above for 90% of this time period. They have been constantly at REAP 4 since 9 October 2024. The lowest escalation level that this ambulance service has been at in this period is REAP 2. They have never been at steady state (REAP 1) during this period. I have also been provided with data regarding the number of hours that ambulances have spent queuing at hospitals in the last 3 months (September to November 2024). This amounts to 23,253 hours. This is an average of 255.5 hours across the service every single day. The national picture
1. In the period July 2013 to 24th November 2024, 217 Prevention of Future Deaths Reports (‘PFDs’) were written to ambulance trusts. It is fair to say that not all of these will relate to delay, but a significant number of them do.
2. There appears to be no oversight of this issue, and a number of ambulance trusts have not responded to these reports at all.
3. I have attached an article published by the Preventable Deaths Tracker in November 2024, which provides further information regarding ambulance PFD reports.
1. In the period July 2013 to 24th November 2024, 217 Prevention of Future Deaths Reports (‘PFDs’) were written to ambulance trusts. It is fair to say that not all of these will relate to delay, but a significant number of them do.
2. There appears to be no oversight of this issue, and a number of ambulance trusts have not responded to these reports at all.
3. I have attached an article published by the Preventable Deaths Tracker in November 2024, which provides further information regarding ambulance PFD reports.
Responses
Action Planned
NHS England is working to improve Category 2 ambulance response times and urgent and emergency care services by growing the workforce, improving hospital flow, reducing handover delays, speeding up discharges, and expanding community services, and has set targets for 2024/25. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. (AI summary)
NHS England is working to improve Category 2 ambulance response times and urgent and emergency care services by growing the workforce, improving hospital flow, reducing handover delays, speeding up discharges, and expanding community services, and has set targets for 2024/25. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Coroner, Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Andrew Michael Lewis who died on 7 May 2024
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 19 December 2024 concerning the death of Andrew Michael Lewis on 7 May 2024. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my deep condolences to Andrew’s family and loved ones. NHS England are keen to assure the family and the Coroner that the concerns raised about Andrew’s care have been listened to and reflected upon.
Your Report raised concerns over the pressures being placed on ambulance trusts, and the delays to response times this can cause. You raised concerns regarding South Central Ambulance Service (SCAS) specifically, but also the national picture. NHS England recognises the significant pressures on all NHS services, including ambulances, and has been prioritising improvements to Category 2 response times and urgent and emergency care services. NHS England has also recognised the need to increase ambulance capacity through growing the workforce, improving flow through hospitals and reducing handover delays, speeding up discharges from hospital and expanding new services in the community; all of which support improved patient flow and ambulance response times. The NHS is also working more closely with local authorities to improve the timely discharge of patients and has developed discharge metrics to monitor performance improvements. NHS England’s ambitions for 2024/25 have been set out in the NHS priorities and operational planning guidance. These include:
• improving Category 2 ambulance response times relative to 2023/24, to an average of 30 minutes across 2024/25; and
• improving A&E performance with 78% of patients being admitted, transferred, or discharged within 4 hours by March 2025.
Improvements to ambulance response times are also being enabled by addressing excessive handover delays. Rapid handovers are essential to ensure that patients reach definitive care promptly, which includes both those waiting to receive care in the Emergency Department (ED), and those waiting in the community. NHS England continues to work with trusts and services with significant handover challenges at the National Medical Director NHS England Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG
12 February 2025
‘front end’, alongside recognising the importance of reducing length of stay and timely discharge to maintain adequate patient flow and allow new patients to be handed over more promptly to EDs.
Your Report also raised that there appears to be no oversight of Prevention of Future Death (PFD) Reports written to ambulance trusts, and a significant number of these Reports relate to ambulance delays. PFD Reports sent to ambulance services are reviewed by the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE) National Ambulance Services Medical Directors’ Group (NASMeD) and the AACE Quality Governance Group to capture themes and learning. I also wish to provide assurance that all PFDs regarding ambulance services that are sent to NHS England are reviewed by our National Ambulance Team, as well as being discussed at our Regulation 28 Working Group (see penultimate paragraph below). NHS England is unable to provide comment on individual trusts not responding to PFD Reports.
Regarding SCAS specifically, they have advised us that PFD Reports addressed to them are shared with all SCAS clinical leads and executives for awareness. On review, if it is felt that changes are required then these are discussed with the relevant service line director and governance leads who will determine the best way to mitigate or eliminate the concern raised, with proposed responses being reviewed by the CEO. They are required to share all PFD Reports received with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) and their commissioning Integrated Care Boards. As well as sharing PFD Reports and responses with AACE, they will also share them with NASMeD.
SCAS also advise that they review other ambulance service PFD Reports through their Learning from Deaths (LFD) forum, which is chaired by an Assistant Medical Director. The forum will discuss whether concerns addressed to other ambulance services are also relevant to SCAS and whether additional action is required.
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Andrew, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 19 December 2024 concerning the death of Andrew Michael Lewis on 7 May 2024. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my deep condolences to Andrew’s family and loved ones. NHS England are keen to assure the family and the Coroner that the concerns raised about Andrew’s care have been listened to and reflected upon.
Your Report raised concerns over the pressures being placed on ambulance trusts, and the delays to response times this can cause. You raised concerns regarding South Central Ambulance Service (SCAS) specifically, but also the national picture. NHS England recognises the significant pressures on all NHS services, including ambulances, and has been prioritising improvements to Category 2 response times and urgent and emergency care services. NHS England has also recognised the need to increase ambulance capacity through growing the workforce, improving flow through hospitals and reducing handover delays, speeding up discharges from hospital and expanding new services in the community; all of which support improved patient flow and ambulance response times. The NHS is also working more closely with local authorities to improve the timely discharge of patients and has developed discharge metrics to monitor performance improvements. NHS England’s ambitions for 2024/25 have been set out in the NHS priorities and operational planning guidance. These include:
• improving Category 2 ambulance response times relative to 2023/24, to an average of 30 minutes across 2024/25; and
• improving A&E performance with 78% of patients being admitted, transferred, or discharged within 4 hours by March 2025.
Improvements to ambulance response times are also being enabled by addressing excessive handover delays. Rapid handovers are essential to ensure that patients reach definitive care promptly, which includes both those waiting to receive care in the Emergency Department (ED), and those waiting in the community. NHS England continues to work with trusts and services with significant handover challenges at the National Medical Director NHS England Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG
12 February 2025
‘front end’, alongside recognising the importance of reducing length of stay and timely discharge to maintain adequate patient flow and allow new patients to be handed over more promptly to EDs.
Your Report also raised that there appears to be no oversight of Prevention of Future Death (PFD) Reports written to ambulance trusts, and a significant number of these Reports relate to ambulance delays. PFD Reports sent to ambulance services are reviewed by the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE) National Ambulance Services Medical Directors’ Group (NASMeD) and the AACE Quality Governance Group to capture themes and learning. I also wish to provide assurance that all PFDs regarding ambulance services that are sent to NHS England are reviewed by our National Ambulance Team, as well as being discussed at our Regulation 28 Working Group (see penultimate paragraph below). NHS England is unable to provide comment on individual trusts not responding to PFD Reports.
Regarding SCAS specifically, they have advised us that PFD Reports addressed to them are shared with all SCAS clinical leads and executives for awareness. On review, if it is felt that changes are required then these are discussed with the relevant service line director and governance leads who will determine the best way to mitigate or eliminate the concern raised, with proposed responses being reviewed by the CEO. They are required to share all PFD Reports received with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) and their commissioning Integrated Care Boards. As well as sharing PFD Reports and responses with AACE, they will also share them with NASMeD.
SCAS also advise that they review other ambulance service PFD Reports through their Learning from Deaths (LFD) forum, which is chaired by an Assistant Medical Director. The forum will discuss whether concerns addressed to other ambulance services are also relevant to SCAS and whether additional action is required.
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Andrew, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Action Planned
The government has set delivery instructions for the NHS through the prioritisation of five key objectives aimed at driving reform within the NHS, including improving A&E and ambulance wait times. In Spring 2025, the Government will publish its 10-Year Health Plan which will set out radical reforms for the NHS. (AI summary)
The government has set delivery instructions for the NHS through the prioritisation of five key objectives aimed at driving reform within the NHS, including improving A&E and ambulance wait times. In Spring 2025, the Government will publish its 10-Year Health Plan which will set out radical reforms for the NHS. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Ms Connor,
Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 19 December 2024, sent to the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, about the death of Andrew Michael Lewis. I am replying as the Minister with responsibility for urgent and emergency care.
Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Mr Lewis’ death and I offer my sincere condolences to his family and loved ones. The information your report provides are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention.
The report raises concerns over long ambulance response times, the ongoing operational pressures experienced by South Central Ambulance Service, ambulance handover delays at hospitals, the oversight of Prevention of Future Death reports and issues with ambulance trusts responding to reports.
In preparing this response, my officials have made enquiries with NHS England to ensure we adequately address your concerns. I understand that NHS England, as the appropriate body, will be responding to your concern raised on the response to prevention of future death reports sent to individual ambulance trusts.
The Government is clear that patients should expect and receive the highest standard of service and care from the NHS. The Government also accepts that the NHS’s urgent and emergency care performance has been below the high standards that patients should expect in recent years. I also recognise that the number of reports being raised by coroners in relation to ambulance response times is concerning. I would like to assure you that the Government is committed to getting ambulance response times back to the NHS Constitutional standards.
We have been honest about the challenges facing the NHS and we are serious about tackling the issues; however we must be clear that there are no quick fixes.
To start with, in the Autumn Budget, the Government announced an extra £22.6 billion in day-to-day spending in 2025/26 for the NHS compared to 2023/24, to help deliver 40,000 extra appointments a week and cut NHS waiting times. An additional £3.1bn further capital investment over 2 years will provide the highest real-terms capital budget since before 2010.
We recognise that investment alone won’t be enough and are determined that it must go hand in hand with fundamental reform. On 5 December 2024, the Government published the Plan for Change (available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/plan-for- change), that set the mandate for the direction of change with clear milestones in five national missions, including building an NHS that is fit for the future.
On 30 January 2025 the Government published ‘Road to recovery: the government's 2025 mandate to NHS England’, that clearly set out delivery instructions for the NHS through the prioritisation of five key objectives aimed at driving reform within the NHS. Improving A&E and ambulance wait time was a prioritised objective in the mandate to specifically address the current challenges facing urgent and emergency care. On the same day NHS England published the 2025-26 planning guidance that contained the operational delivery detail for local NHS systems. The planning guidance included an implementation target for improving the average Category 2 ambulance response times to no more than 30 minutes across 2025-26, and practical actions focused on reducing avoidable ambulance dispatches and conveyances and ambulance handover delays.
In Spring 2025, to accompany the additional investment in the NHS, the Government will publish its 10-Year Health Plan which will set out the radical reforms for the NHS. The health plan will focus on ensuring three big reform shifts in the way our health services deliver care. First, from ‘hospital to community’ to bring care closer to where people live. Second, from ‘analogue to digital’ with new technologies and digital approaches to modernise the NHS, and third from ‘sickness to prevention’ so people spend less time with ill-health by preventing illnesses before they happen. The reforms will support putting the NHS on a sustainable footing so it can tackle the problems of today and the future.
In addition, by this Spring we will also set out the lessons learned from the pressures on urgent and emergency care services this winter and the improvements that we will put in place to improve services ahead of next winter.
I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention.
Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 19 December 2024, sent to the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, about the death of Andrew Michael Lewis. I am replying as the Minister with responsibility for urgent and emergency care.
Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Mr Lewis’ death and I offer my sincere condolences to his family and loved ones. The information your report provides are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention.
The report raises concerns over long ambulance response times, the ongoing operational pressures experienced by South Central Ambulance Service, ambulance handover delays at hospitals, the oversight of Prevention of Future Death reports and issues with ambulance trusts responding to reports.
In preparing this response, my officials have made enquiries with NHS England to ensure we adequately address your concerns. I understand that NHS England, as the appropriate body, will be responding to your concern raised on the response to prevention of future death reports sent to individual ambulance trusts.
The Government is clear that patients should expect and receive the highest standard of service and care from the NHS. The Government also accepts that the NHS’s urgent and emergency care performance has been below the high standards that patients should expect in recent years. I also recognise that the number of reports being raised by coroners in relation to ambulance response times is concerning. I would like to assure you that the Government is committed to getting ambulance response times back to the NHS Constitutional standards.
We have been honest about the challenges facing the NHS and we are serious about tackling the issues; however we must be clear that there are no quick fixes.
To start with, in the Autumn Budget, the Government announced an extra £22.6 billion in day-to-day spending in 2025/26 for the NHS compared to 2023/24, to help deliver 40,000 extra appointments a week and cut NHS waiting times. An additional £3.1bn further capital investment over 2 years will provide the highest real-terms capital budget since before 2010.
We recognise that investment alone won’t be enough and are determined that it must go hand in hand with fundamental reform. On 5 December 2024, the Government published the Plan for Change (available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/plan-for- change), that set the mandate for the direction of change with clear milestones in five national missions, including building an NHS that is fit for the future.
On 30 January 2025 the Government published ‘Road to recovery: the government's 2025 mandate to NHS England’, that clearly set out delivery instructions for the NHS through the prioritisation of five key objectives aimed at driving reform within the NHS. Improving A&E and ambulance wait time was a prioritised objective in the mandate to specifically address the current challenges facing urgent and emergency care. On the same day NHS England published the 2025-26 planning guidance that contained the operational delivery detail for local NHS systems. The planning guidance included an implementation target for improving the average Category 2 ambulance response times to no more than 30 minutes across 2025-26, and practical actions focused on reducing avoidable ambulance dispatches and conveyances and ambulance handover delays.
In Spring 2025, to accompany the additional investment in the NHS, the Government will publish its 10-Year Health Plan which will set out the radical reforms for the NHS. The health plan will focus on ensuring three big reform shifts in the way our health services deliver care. First, from ‘hospital to community’ to bring care closer to where people live. Second, from ‘analogue to digital’ with new technologies and digital approaches to modernise the NHS, and third from ‘sickness to prevention’ so people spend less time with ill-health by preventing illnesses before they happen. The reforms will support putting the NHS on a sustainable footing so it can tackle the problems of today and the future.
In addition, by this Spring we will also set out the lessons learned from the pressures on urgent and emergency care services this winter and the improvements that we will put in place to improve services ahead of next winter.
I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention.
Sent To
- Department of Health and Social Care
- NHS England
Response Status
Linked responses
2 of 2
56-Day Deadline
13 Feb 2025
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 22nd of May 2024 I opened an inquest into the death of Andrew Michael Lewis. The inquest was conducted on 6th of December 2024. The cause of death was: 1a) Acute on Chronic Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage 1b) Bleeding Oesophageal Varices 1c) Alcoholic Liver Cirrhosis
2) Low volume Subdural Haemorrhage The conclusion of the inquest was: Alcohol-related, contributed to by head injury.
2) Low volume Subdural Haemorrhage The conclusion of the inquest was: Alcohol-related, contributed to by head injury.
Circumstances of the Death
Andrew Lewis was a 55 year old man who died at home on the 7th of May 2024. He called 111 at 13:42 on 7th of May 2024, reporting weakness in his legs and an earlier fall. The key times are: 13:42 Called 111, categorised as Category 3 (ie response time within 120 minutes for 90% of calls). This decision required confirmation by a clinician within South Central Ambulance Service (‘SCAS’), as the original call was to 111. 15:17 SCAS categorised the call as Category 3. The 120 minute ‘clock’ began to run at this point. An ambulance should therefore have been in attendance by 17:17. 23:45 Ambulance arrived. Andrew was deceased. This ambulance arrived because family and police had attended the property, broken in and found him unresponsive – the call was then categorised as Category 1 (the most urgent category). I accepted at inquest that the reason for this chronology was that there was simply no ambulance to send earlier.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
London Fire Brigade to establish lessons learned process
Grenfell Tower Inquiry
No open learning culture
Ensure Home Office staff presence and visibility in IRCs
Brook House Inquiry
No open learning culture
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.