Malcolm Garrett
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2024-0281
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 26 Jul 2024
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
There was no specific guidance for managing or expediting discharge for high-risk immunosuppressed patients susceptible to Covid-19 in hospital. Additionally, insufficient monitoring and understanding of kidney function led to opiate toxicity.
View full coroner's concerns
1. The Inquest heard that it was recognised that Mr Garrett was at high risk of acquiring Covid-19 in a hospital setting as he was immunosuppressed following his transplant. Despite the risk being recognised he still acquired Covid-19. The Inquest heard that all such patients are at high risk in an acute hospital setting but there is no specific guidance for their management;
2. The evidence before the inquest was that Mr Garratt needed to be discharged as quickly as possible to reduce the risk of acquiring Covid-19. However there was no specific guidance about expediting patients such as him and looking at alternative methods of treatment;
3. His discharge was delayed in part due to opiate toxicity. That arose as a consequence of his kidneys not functioning correctly. The inquest heard evidence that to avoid opiate toxicity is such situations there needs to be a greater use of and understanding of the importance of monitoring kidney function.
2. The evidence before the inquest was that Mr Garratt needed to be discharged as quickly as possible to reduce the risk of acquiring Covid-19. However there was no specific guidance about expediting patients such as him and looking at alternative methods of treatment;
3. His discharge was delayed in part due to opiate toxicity. That arose as a consequence of his kidneys not functioning correctly. The inquest heard evidence that to avoid opiate toxicity is such situations there needs to be a greater use of and understanding of the importance of monitoring kidney function.
Responses
Noted
The Department acknowledges the concerns, states that NHS England engaged with the Trust, and that the CQC did not identify a need for further investigation of this specific case but continues to monitor the Trust’s performance. (AI summary)
The Department acknowledges the concerns, states that NHS England engaged with the Trust, and that the CQC did not identify a need for further investigation of this specific case but continues to monitor the Trust’s performance. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Ms Mutch,
Thank you for your Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths of 4 August 2022 about the death of Mr Malcolm John Garrett. I am replying as Minister with responsibility for Health and Secondary Care. Please accept my sincere apologies for the significant delay in responding to this matter.
Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Mr Garrett’s death and I offer my sincere condolences to his family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention.
The report raises concerns over:
(i) The Inquest heard that it was recognised that Mr Garrett was at high risk of acquiring COVID-19 in a hospital setting as he was immunosuppressed following his transplant. Despite the risk being recognised he still acquired COVID-19. The inquest heard that all such patients are at high risk in an acute hospital setting but there is no specific guidance for their management; (ii) The evidence before the inquest was that Mr Garratt needed to be discharged as quickly as possible to reduce the risk of acquiring COVID-19. However there was no specific guidance about expediting patients such as him and looking at alternative methods of treatment; (iii) Mr Garratt’s discharge was delayed in part due to opiate toxicity. That arose as a consequence of his kidneys not functioning correctly. The inquest heard evidence that to avoid opiate toxicity in such situations there needs to be a greater use of and understanding of the importance of monitoring kidney function.
In preparing this response, Departmental officials have made enquiries with NHS England, the Care Quality Commission (CQC) and the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA).
You may wish to note that during the COVID-19 pandemic, extensive clinical guidance was issued by the NHS (eg. Coronavirus (england.nhs.uk) as well as by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), see Overview | COVID- 19 rapid guideline: managing COVID-19 | Guidance | NICE. More broadly, UKHSA also issued guidance in relation to patient discharge and infection prevention and control in health and care settings.1.
With regard to the issue relating to opiate toxicity and the need to understand the importance of monitoring kidney function. There is general guidance in the British National Formulary (BNF) in terms of ‘Prescribing in renal impairment’ and every opiate listed in the BNF will have an entry in relation to renal impairment eg codeine and morphine both state “Avoid use or reduce dose; opioid effects increased and prolonged or increased cerebral sensitivity occurs”.
The CQC advised that the matters of concern in this case, namely, hospital acquired COVID-19 and deaths attributed to a failure in monitoring kidney function are subject to regular reporting and/or evaluation as part of CQC’s monitoring and engagement activity. A management review meeting held in August 2022 concluded that neither concern was reflected in the monitoring data CQC held in relation to this Trust, such as being an outlier for the management of kidney injury. The Trust was asked at the time to provide any records or investigation reports relating to the death which the CQC would consider as part of its ongoing monitoring and engagement to ensure patients receive safe care and treatment.
The CQC subsequently followed up on this case with the Trust. They advised that the Trust provided sufficient assurance that they followed national guidance to try to minimise the likelihood of hospital acquired COVID-19, and to discharge medically optimised patients as quickly as possible against the backdrop of the limited social care availability during the pandemic. The CQC also received assurance from the Trust that they had identified learning and actions in response to complaints and inquest findings in relation to the clinical management of Mr Garrett’s kidney function. Due to these assurances, the CQC did not identify a need for further investigation of this specific case. However, the CQC continues to monitor the Trust’s performance in relation to hospital acquired infections, discharges and learning from incidents as part of its ongoing monitoring and engagement.
NHS England also engaged with the Trust and advised that the Trust has a process in place to manage and reduce the risks of patients in vulnerable groups. They further advised that the Trust has shared the learning from this incident and that it has continued to focus on patient discharge.
I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention.
1 [Withdrawn] Stepdown of infection control precautions and discharging COVID-19 patients and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected patients - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
Thank you for your Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths of 4 August 2022 about the death of Mr Malcolm John Garrett. I am replying as Minister with responsibility for Health and Secondary Care. Please accept my sincere apologies for the significant delay in responding to this matter.
Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Mr Garrett’s death and I offer my sincere condolences to his family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention.
The report raises concerns over:
(i) The Inquest heard that it was recognised that Mr Garrett was at high risk of acquiring COVID-19 in a hospital setting as he was immunosuppressed following his transplant. Despite the risk being recognised he still acquired COVID-19. The inquest heard that all such patients are at high risk in an acute hospital setting but there is no specific guidance for their management; (ii) The evidence before the inquest was that Mr Garratt needed to be discharged as quickly as possible to reduce the risk of acquiring COVID-19. However there was no specific guidance about expediting patients such as him and looking at alternative methods of treatment; (iii) Mr Garratt’s discharge was delayed in part due to opiate toxicity. That arose as a consequence of his kidneys not functioning correctly. The inquest heard evidence that to avoid opiate toxicity in such situations there needs to be a greater use of and understanding of the importance of monitoring kidney function.
In preparing this response, Departmental officials have made enquiries with NHS England, the Care Quality Commission (CQC) and the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA).
You may wish to note that during the COVID-19 pandemic, extensive clinical guidance was issued by the NHS (eg. Coronavirus (england.nhs.uk) as well as by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), see Overview | COVID- 19 rapid guideline: managing COVID-19 | Guidance | NICE. More broadly, UKHSA also issued guidance in relation to patient discharge and infection prevention and control in health and care settings.1.
With regard to the issue relating to opiate toxicity and the need to understand the importance of monitoring kidney function. There is general guidance in the British National Formulary (BNF) in terms of ‘Prescribing in renal impairment’ and every opiate listed in the BNF will have an entry in relation to renal impairment eg codeine and morphine both state “Avoid use or reduce dose; opioid effects increased and prolonged or increased cerebral sensitivity occurs”.
The CQC advised that the matters of concern in this case, namely, hospital acquired COVID-19 and deaths attributed to a failure in monitoring kidney function are subject to regular reporting and/or evaluation as part of CQC’s monitoring and engagement activity. A management review meeting held in August 2022 concluded that neither concern was reflected in the monitoring data CQC held in relation to this Trust, such as being an outlier for the management of kidney injury. The Trust was asked at the time to provide any records or investigation reports relating to the death which the CQC would consider as part of its ongoing monitoring and engagement to ensure patients receive safe care and treatment.
The CQC subsequently followed up on this case with the Trust. They advised that the Trust provided sufficient assurance that they followed national guidance to try to minimise the likelihood of hospital acquired COVID-19, and to discharge medically optimised patients as quickly as possible against the backdrop of the limited social care availability during the pandemic. The CQC also received assurance from the Trust that they had identified learning and actions in response to complaints and inquest findings in relation to the clinical management of Mr Garrett’s kidney function. Due to these assurances, the CQC did not identify a need for further investigation of this specific case. However, the CQC continues to monitor the Trust’s performance in relation to hospital acquired infections, discharges and learning from incidents as part of its ongoing monitoring and engagement.
NHS England also engaged with the Trust and advised that the Trust has a process in place to manage and reduce the risks of patients in vulnerable groups. They further advised that the Trust has shared the learning from this incident and that it has continued to focus on patient discharge.
I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention.
1 [Withdrawn] Stepdown of infection control precautions and discharging COVID-19 patients and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected patients - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
Sent To
- Department of Health and Social Care
Response Status
Linked responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
26 Jul 2024
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 30th September 2021 I commenced an investigation into the death of Malcolm John Garrett. The investigation concluded on the 16th June 2022 and the conclusion was one of Narrative: Died from Covid-19 acquired whilst an inpatient contributed to by the complications of a lung transplant. The medical cause of death was 1a) Covid pneumonitis and pseudomonas aeruginosa bronchopneumonia; II) Chronic immunosuppression (lung transplant 2013), chronic allograft dysfunction/bronchiolitis obliterans, non-traumatic thoracic vertebra wedge fracture, ischaemic heart disease, chronic kidney disease.
Circumstances of the Death
Malcolm John Garrett had a bilateral lung transplant in 2013. He was placed on long term medications to avoid rejection of the transplant. He was immunosuppressed as a consequence. He also developed chronic allograft dysfunction and chronic kidney disease and ischaemic heart disease that are recognised long term complications in transplant patients. He developed severe back pain and was admitted to Stepping Hill Hospital on 2nd August 2021. A MR of the spine showed a traumatic wedge fracture of the vertebra at T9. He was given pain relief and subsequently fitted with a brace. On 7th August 2021 he had symptoms of opiate toxicity and was treated with opiate reversing medications. The toxicity was probably as a consequence of an acute kidney injury. He was found to have developed pneumonia and was treated for it. He was placed on NIV due to ongoing acidosis. Subsequently he was stabilised and was weaned off NIV. On 8th September he deteriorated significantly and was again started on NIV and intravenous antibiotics. He stabilised again. Subsequently on 17th September 2021 he began to deteriorate again. Antibiotics were restarted as he showed signs of infection. On 19th September 2021 he was confirmed to be Covid-19 positive having acquired it whilst in the hospital. He was moved to a Covid ward and treated. He subsequently deteriorated further and died at Stepping Hill Hospital on 23rd September 2021. Post-mortem examination confirmed the direct cause of his death was a combination of Covid pneumonitis and pseudomonas aeruginosa bronchopneumonia.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Continuing responsibility for care
Mid Staffs Inquiry
No person-centred care
Care and discharge planning
Establish comprehensive counselling and support services as integral to patient care
Bristol Heart Inquiry
No person-centred care
Care and discharge planning
Transfusion Committees and Tranexamic Acid - England
Infected Blood Inquiry
High-risk medication monitoring
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.