Alfie Nicholls
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2024-0084
All 2 responses received
· Deadline: 10 Apr 2024
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Poor understanding and recognition of Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) among professionals, coupled with inadequate cross-sector strategies and non-holistic care planning, increased risks for vulnerable children.
View full coroner's concerns
1. The inquest heard evidence that Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) was not widely understood by those involved with children and adults who may be impacted by it. That included a lack of awareness of what it was and how to approach it amongst Health, Education and Social Work professionals. The inquest was told that until awareness of it improved then similar situations to that of Alfie could go unrecognised with similar consequences.
2. Evidence before the Inquest was that in addition to there being increased awareness amongst professionals there needed to be strategies within and across Health, Education and Social care to ensure effective strategies were put in place and those with ARFID or at risk of developing ARFID were identified and managed effectively.
3. A feature of the evidence before the Inquest was a normalisation of poor and restricted eating by children with autism. This meant that the impact on their overall health and wellbeing was not considered. Children with autism were measured against each other in relation to their eating with phrases such as “we have children with poorer diets …” being used.
4. Whilst there was an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP) in place for Alfie there was little evidence that EHCPs were being used as a holistic tool to understand the inter relationship between health and education. There was evidence that those writing EHCPs needed to consider a child more holistically for the EHCP to cover all the aspects that it was meant to cover and not just to focus on education.
5. The Inquest heard that the school nurse service could play a vital role in identifying health issues and supporting other professionals. This key role was significantly impacted by the high demand on the service and the very high caseloads school nurses working with complex children were being asked to carry nationally.
6. The role of a dietician in supporting children with eating disorders could be fundamental in maximising the nutritional value of what they consumed. Demands on the service and a limited understanding of how they could work to support children with disorders such as ARFID (nationally) meant that there was rarely regular input from dieticians.
7. ARFID, the Inquest was told, could lead to medical emergencies in eating disorders (MEED). The evidence given at the Inquest was that whilst this concept had been the subject of guidance amongst Psychiatrists it had been less publicised and there had been far less guidance by other Royal Colleges. In particular the Inquest was told that MEED needed to be far better understood by medical professionals in acute settings such as Emergency Departments and Paediatrics to avoid a situation where the impact of ARFID and the medical risk it posed was not understood until it was too late.
2. Evidence before the Inquest was that in addition to there being increased awareness amongst professionals there needed to be strategies within and across Health, Education and Social care to ensure effective strategies were put in place and those with ARFID or at risk of developing ARFID were identified and managed effectively.
3. A feature of the evidence before the Inquest was a normalisation of poor and restricted eating by children with autism. This meant that the impact on their overall health and wellbeing was not considered. Children with autism were measured against each other in relation to their eating with phrases such as “we have children with poorer diets …” being used.
4. Whilst there was an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP) in place for Alfie there was little evidence that EHCPs were being used as a holistic tool to understand the inter relationship between health and education. There was evidence that those writing EHCPs needed to consider a child more holistically for the EHCP to cover all the aspects that it was meant to cover and not just to focus on education.
5. The Inquest heard that the school nurse service could play a vital role in identifying health issues and supporting other professionals. This key role was significantly impacted by the high demand on the service and the very high caseloads school nurses working with complex children were being asked to carry nationally.
6. The role of a dietician in supporting children with eating disorders could be fundamental in maximising the nutritional value of what they consumed. Demands on the service and a limited understanding of how they could work to support children with disorders such as ARFID (nationally) meant that there was rarely regular input from dieticians.
7. ARFID, the Inquest was told, could lead to medical emergencies in eating disorders (MEED). The evidence given at the Inquest was that whilst this concept had been the subject of guidance amongst Psychiatrists it had been less publicised and there had been far less guidance by other Royal Colleges. In particular the Inquest was told that MEED needed to be far better understood by medical professionals in acute settings such as Emergency Departments and Paediatrics to avoid a situation where the impact of ARFID and the medical risk it posed was not understood until it was too late.
Responses
Action Taken
Greater Manchester Integrated Care has delivered training sessions on ARFID and made all Stockport pediatricians aware of the recent Royal College of Child Psychiatrists published guidance in relation to ARFID. Information/learning has been shared across NHS Greater Manchester ICB. (AI summary)
Greater Manchester Integrated Care has delivered training sessions on ARFID and made all Stockport pediatricians aware of the recent Royal College of Child Psychiatrists published guidance in relation to ARFID. Information/learning has been shared across NHS Greater Manchester ICB. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Ms Mutch Inquest into the death of Alfie Anthony Kevin Nicholls – Date of Death 17th December 2021 I refer to the Regulation 28 Prevention of Future Deaths Report issued following the inquest into the death of the above named. I am sorry to learn of the circumstances of Alfie’s death and offer my sincere condolences to his family. To support the response to the following matters of concern I will refer to the multi-agency learning event that was completed by Stockport Safeguarding Childrens Partnership [SSCP] in July 2023 following Alfie’s death. The action plan from the Learning Event is having oversight via the Partnerships Learning from Practice Hub model. The inquest heard evidence that Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) was not widely understood by those involved with children and adults who may be impacted by it. That included a lack of awareness of what it was and how to approach it amongst Health, Education and Social Work professionals. The inquest was told that until awareness of it improved then similar situations to that of Alfie could go unrecognised with similar consequences. A variety of training sessions have been delivered in Stockport during 2023 which includes: (1) Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust Community Eating Disorders Service [CEDS] ARFID is Everybody’s Business Network Event November 2023 with a plan to repeat in Spring 2024. (2) Stockport NHS Foundation Trust Children and Young People’s Mental Health Education Practitioner includes ARFID in the training delivered to staff and it has been included as part of the Level 3 Safeguarding Children training offer. (3) Stockport Dietetic Service have completed the Maudsley ARFID training in 2023. (4) Spring North ARFID Training Sessions have been shared across the locality and several Stockport practitioners across health and social care have completed the training and there is currently a waiting list. (5) The SSCP Learning Event Action Plan includes the development of a 7-minute briefing that will be easily available across the Partnership to all agencies. A1
Evidence before the Inquest was that in addition to there being increased awareness amongst professionals there needed to be strategies within and across Health, Education and Social care to ensure effective strategies were put in place and those with ARFID or at risk of developing ARFID were identified and managed effectively. Following the SSCP Learning Event there will be a process mapping of current provision planned for May 2024 as there have been several developments since Alfie sadly died to support professionals across Health, Education and Social care to ensure effective strategies are in place to ensure those with ARFID or at risk of developing ARFID were identified and managed effectively. Recent developments include:
• A new dietetic referral pathway for restricted eating which includes a tool to support parents who are concerned. Training of School Nurses and Health Visitors has commenced and will be a rolling program throughout the year to screen when parents raise concerns with 3-day food diaries as part of that pathway.
• Revised medical guidance for paediatricians has been put in place regarding nutritional screening & medical management. A feature of the evidence before the Inquest was a normaliisation of poor and restricted eating by children with autism. This meant that the impact on their overall health and wellbeing was not considered. Children with autism were measured against each other in relation to their eating with phrases such as “we have children with poorer diets …” being used. Following Alfie’s death, Stockport NHS Foundation Trust has undertaken a review of all children known to paediatricians to ensure all had a referral to dietetics, appropriate blood tests and access to food supplements. Recent evidence that there has been a ‘mind shift’ in the normalisation and medical management of children with autism with restricted eating has been demonstrated by 3 children having percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy [PEG] to enhance their nutritional intake. Pediatricians and the CEDS continue to link through the monthly multi-disciplinary meetings where they can discuss children, they are worried about, and refer to the CEDS ARFID pathway if appropriate. Although the CEDS ARFID pathway is for children over the age of 8 at the MDT there is the opportunity to discuss children under the age of 8 and CEDS advise on the management. There are also plans in place to introduce a nutritional element to assessments and plans within Stockport neurodiversity pathways. Whilst there was an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP) in place for Alfie there was little evidence that EHCPs were being used as a holistic tool to understand the inter relationship between health and education. There was evidence that those writing EHCPs needed to consider a child more holistically for the EHCP to cover all the aspects that it was meant to cover and not just to focus on education. Stockport Designated Clinical Officer [DCO] SEND has been leading on assurance work to improve the quality of EHCP particularly looking at the health information which is included within them. There are now 2 health links with the Local Authority EHCP team who are supporting the development of a EHCP multi-agency audit process. The DCO also meets with the health links monthly. The DCO is also leading work to ensure the use of the EHCP ‘flag’ within EMIS, the record keeping system for health visitors and school nursing. A2
The SSCP Learning Event Action Plan requests assurance from the EHCP Team that a review is undertaken of children with restrictive eating or ARFID and that health information is included. Schools are responsible for leading the EHCP annual review, so will lead on seeking updating advice and ensuring this element of the plan is reviewed in the meeting. If as an outcome of the EHCP annual review the plan needs to be amended, they the school will provide all the information gathered to the EHCP caseworker to update the plan document. At the SSCP Learning from Practice Hub it was noted that staff at Alfie’s school are now adding information in relation to restricted eating into the health section of the EHCP plan. Work has also commenced to update the Stockport ‘Medical Needs in School Policy’ for children who may have restricted eating but do not have an EHCP in place. The Inquest heard that the school nurse service could play a vital role in identifying health issues and supporting other professionals. This key role was significantly impacted by the high demand on the service and the very high caseloads school nurses working with complex children were being asked to carry nationally. In Stockport the 0-19 yr service is commissioned by Public Health. Stockport reflects the national picture of very high caseloads for school nurses working with complex children. In 2022 a school nursing transformation was undertaken which included an increase to provision resulting in an identified school nurse covering Alfie’s school plus 3 other schools. Stockport School nurses are having an away day this week solely dedicated to ARFID which will support their skills in nutritional assessment and introduce them to the new dietetic pathway. There is a GM workstream regarding special schools and nursing requirements exploring a GM response. The role of a dietician in supporting children with eating disorders could be fundamental in maximising the nutritional value of what they consumed. Demands on the service and a limited understanding of how they could work to support children with disorders such as ARFID (nationally) meant that there was rarely regular input from dieticians. As previously mentioned there has been the development of a new dietetic referral pathway for restricted eating which includes a tool to support parents who are concerned. The aim is to have a consistent approach to ensuring children are nourished if they do not have a varied diet. It clarifies who can refer to the dietetic service including health professionals, school nurses and GPs. The referral pathway is currently being rolled out to GPs, Local Authority Children Services, community health services and schools. It was shared with Alfie’s school prior to roll out to ensure this would support them to work with families and they have reported it has been effective as they have been able to sign post parents to the appropriate place to support a referral. All children who are referred to Pediatricians with restricted eating are routinely referred into Dieticians. ARFID, the Inquest was told, could lead to medical emergencies in eating disorders (MEED). The evidence given at the Inquest was that whilst this concept had been the subject of guidance amongst Psychiatrists it had been less publicised and there had been far less guidance by other Royal Colleges. In particular the Inquest was told that MEED needed to be far better understood by medical professionals in acute settings such as Emergency Departments and Paediatrics to avoid a situation where the impact of ARFID and the medical risk it posed was not understood until it was too late. A3
An action from the SSCP Learning Event was that all Stockport pediatricians be made aware of the recent Royal College of Child Psychiatrists published guidance in relation to ARFID” which was completed in February 2024. As a system we are committed to learning from the sad death of Alfie and I can confirm that information / learning has been shared across NHS Greater Manchester ICB via the following:-
• DCO SEND GM Professional Network
• Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust provided CEDS across Greater Manchester.
• CEDS are awaiting the publication of National CEDS Commissioning Standards expected in Spring 2024 which will develop a GM plan for restricted eating.
• Stockport NHS Foundation Trust Pediatricians have shared the learning across their professional Greater Manchester network. I hope the above assures you and Alfie’s family that lessons have been learnt following the inquest into Alfie’s death and that there is now a clear plan in place to ensure that healthcare professionals recognise ARFID and have access to appropriate care pathways to best support any child with this condition. If you require any additional information please let me know.
Evidence before the Inquest was that in addition to there being increased awareness amongst professionals there needed to be strategies within and across Health, Education and Social care to ensure effective strategies were put in place and those with ARFID or at risk of developing ARFID were identified and managed effectively. Following the SSCP Learning Event there will be a process mapping of current provision planned for May 2024 as there have been several developments since Alfie sadly died to support professionals across Health, Education and Social care to ensure effective strategies are in place to ensure those with ARFID or at risk of developing ARFID were identified and managed effectively. Recent developments include:
• A new dietetic referral pathway for restricted eating which includes a tool to support parents who are concerned. Training of School Nurses and Health Visitors has commenced and will be a rolling program throughout the year to screen when parents raise concerns with 3-day food diaries as part of that pathway.
• Revised medical guidance for paediatricians has been put in place regarding nutritional screening & medical management. A feature of the evidence before the Inquest was a normaliisation of poor and restricted eating by children with autism. This meant that the impact on their overall health and wellbeing was not considered. Children with autism were measured against each other in relation to their eating with phrases such as “we have children with poorer diets …” being used. Following Alfie’s death, Stockport NHS Foundation Trust has undertaken a review of all children known to paediatricians to ensure all had a referral to dietetics, appropriate blood tests and access to food supplements. Recent evidence that there has been a ‘mind shift’ in the normalisation and medical management of children with autism with restricted eating has been demonstrated by 3 children having percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy [PEG] to enhance their nutritional intake. Pediatricians and the CEDS continue to link through the monthly multi-disciplinary meetings where they can discuss children, they are worried about, and refer to the CEDS ARFID pathway if appropriate. Although the CEDS ARFID pathway is for children over the age of 8 at the MDT there is the opportunity to discuss children under the age of 8 and CEDS advise on the management. There are also plans in place to introduce a nutritional element to assessments and plans within Stockport neurodiversity pathways. Whilst there was an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP) in place for Alfie there was little evidence that EHCPs were being used as a holistic tool to understand the inter relationship between health and education. There was evidence that those writing EHCPs needed to consider a child more holistically for the EHCP to cover all the aspects that it was meant to cover and not just to focus on education. Stockport Designated Clinical Officer [DCO] SEND has been leading on assurance work to improve the quality of EHCP particularly looking at the health information which is included within them. There are now 2 health links with the Local Authority EHCP team who are supporting the development of a EHCP multi-agency audit process. The DCO also meets with the health links monthly. The DCO is also leading work to ensure the use of the EHCP ‘flag’ within EMIS, the record keeping system for health visitors and school nursing. A2
The SSCP Learning Event Action Plan requests assurance from the EHCP Team that a review is undertaken of children with restrictive eating or ARFID and that health information is included. Schools are responsible for leading the EHCP annual review, so will lead on seeking updating advice and ensuring this element of the plan is reviewed in the meeting. If as an outcome of the EHCP annual review the plan needs to be amended, they the school will provide all the information gathered to the EHCP caseworker to update the plan document. At the SSCP Learning from Practice Hub it was noted that staff at Alfie’s school are now adding information in relation to restricted eating into the health section of the EHCP plan. Work has also commenced to update the Stockport ‘Medical Needs in School Policy’ for children who may have restricted eating but do not have an EHCP in place. The Inquest heard that the school nurse service could play a vital role in identifying health issues and supporting other professionals. This key role was significantly impacted by the high demand on the service and the very high caseloads school nurses working with complex children were being asked to carry nationally. In Stockport the 0-19 yr service is commissioned by Public Health. Stockport reflects the national picture of very high caseloads for school nurses working with complex children. In 2022 a school nursing transformation was undertaken which included an increase to provision resulting in an identified school nurse covering Alfie’s school plus 3 other schools. Stockport School nurses are having an away day this week solely dedicated to ARFID which will support their skills in nutritional assessment and introduce them to the new dietetic pathway. There is a GM workstream regarding special schools and nursing requirements exploring a GM response. The role of a dietician in supporting children with eating disorders could be fundamental in maximising the nutritional value of what they consumed. Demands on the service and a limited understanding of how they could work to support children with disorders such as ARFID (nationally) meant that there was rarely regular input from dieticians. As previously mentioned there has been the development of a new dietetic referral pathway for restricted eating which includes a tool to support parents who are concerned. The aim is to have a consistent approach to ensuring children are nourished if they do not have a varied diet. It clarifies who can refer to the dietetic service including health professionals, school nurses and GPs. The referral pathway is currently being rolled out to GPs, Local Authority Children Services, community health services and schools. It was shared with Alfie’s school prior to roll out to ensure this would support them to work with families and they have reported it has been effective as they have been able to sign post parents to the appropriate place to support a referral. All children who are referred to Pediatricians with restricted eating are routinely referred into Dieticians. ARFID, the Inquest was told, could lead to medical emergencies in eating disorders (MEED). The evidence given at the Inquest was that whilst this concept had been the subject of guidance amongst Psychiatrists it had been less publicised and there had been far less guidance by other Royal Colleges. In particular the Inquest was told that MEED needed to be far better understood by medical professionals in acute settings such as Emergency Departments and Paediatrics to avoid a situation where the impact of ARFID and the medical risk it posed was not understood until it was too late. A3
An action from the SSCP Learning Event was that all Stockport pediatricians be made aware of the recent Royal College of Child Psychiatrists published guidance in relation to ARFID” which was completed in February 2024. As a system we are committed to learning from the sad death of Alfie and I can confirm that information / learning has been shared across NHS Greater Manchester ICB via the following:-
• DCO SEND GM Professional Network
• Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust provided CEDS across Greater Manchester.
• CEDS are awaiting the publication of National CEDS Commissioning Standards expected in Spring 2024 which will develop a GM plan for restricted eating.
• Stockport NHS Foundation Trust Pediatricians have shared the learning across their professional Greater Manchester network. I hope the above assures you and Alfie’s family that lessons have been learnt following the inquest into Alfie’s death and that there is now a clear plan in place to ensure that healthcare professionals recognise ARFID and have access to appropriate care pathways to best support any child with this condition. If you require any additional information please let me know.
Noted
NICE has concluded that it is not best placed to develop guidance on avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, and in particular in medical emergencies in eating disorders. They will refer the report to their surveillance team for consideration when the eating disorders guideline is next reviewed. (AI summary)
NICE has concluded that it is not best placed to develop guidance on avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, and in particular in medical emergencies in eating disorders. They will refer the report to their surveillance team for consideration when the eating disorders guideline is next reviewed. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Ms Mutch Re: Regulation 28 Prevention of Future Deaths Report (Michelle Louise Whitehead) I write in response to your regulation 28 report dated 14 February 2024 regarding the very sad death of Alfie Anthony Kevin Nicholls. I would like to express my sincere condolences to Alfie’s family. The patient safety leads at NICE have discussed the report and understand that your request is that we develop guidance onavoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, and in particular in medical emergencies in eating disorders (MEED), as is mentioned in paragraph 7 of the matters of concern. We have concluded that the request is for such guidance to be directed to ‘medical professionals in acute settings such as Emergency Departments and Paediatrics’. Our conclusion is that NICE is not best placed to develop guidance in this area. ARFID was explicitly excluded from the scope of our eating disorders guideline NG69 for the reason that it is a relatively new diagnostic category and one for which there is as yet little in the way of evidence on which to make recommendations. A recent literature review of the subject from University College London and the Maudsley Centre for Child and Adolescent Eating Disorders concluded that whilst ARFID is a common and impactful problem among young people with autism, it is currently under-researched. The authors stated that work is required to identify the prevalence of ARFID in children and young people with autism; to uncover the key drivers of ARFID in this population; to adapt currently available interventions for use with children and young people with autism; and to rigorously test these interventions A5
in clinical trials. Until this work is done, it is unlikely that NICE will be able to produce useful and usable guidance in this area. There are, however, a number of resources available to healthcare practitioners and families and carers of people with ARFID, including the work of the charities ‘Beat Eating Disorders UK’ (ARFID - Beat (beateatingdisorders.org.uk)) and ARFID awareness UK (ARFID Awareness UK). The NHS webpage on eating disorders links to the Beat website in its section on ARFID. A position paper has been written by members of the ARFID Special Interest Group (ARFID SIG), which is part of the British Dietetic Association (BDA). Locally, a number of NHS trusts have produced guidance for parents and health care professionals, such as this from Cambridge. In 2021-22, the British Paediatric Surveillance Unit, part of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health undertook a surveillance study in the UK and Republic of Ireland to establish incidence rates (number of new cases) of ARFID in children and young people presenting to secondary health care, and also to get information on ARFID, specifically on referral pathways, patterns of presentation, and clinical features (eating behaviours, medical complications and the types of medical or psychiatric presentations it is associated with). This study has not reported yet. A systematic review of the literature by the same authors published in 2023 concluded that ‘The current literature on the epidemiology of ARFID in children and adolescents is limited. Studies are heterogeneous with regard to setting and sample characteristics, with a wide range of prevalence estimates. Further studies, especially using surveillance methodology, will help to better understand the nature of this disorder and estimate clinical service needs. We will refer this report to our surveillance team so that the inclusion of ARFID can be considered when our eating disorders guideline is next reviewed, or when the literature on ARFID has matured sufficiently to allow the development of reliable, evidence-based guidance. The NICE guideline surveillance team monitors and reviews new evidence to determine whether guidelines should be updated. An exceptional surveillance review is undertaken when we are alerted to new, significant evidence relevant to the topic. In the meantime, the view of NICE is that clinicians should follow the information provided by specialist groups such as the British Dietetic Association and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health as well as the specific charities. I hope this information is helpful.
in clinical trials. Until this work is done, it is unlikely that NICE will be able to produce useful and usable guidance in this area. There are, however, a number of resources available to healthcare practitioners and families and carers of people with ARFID, including the work of the charities ‘Beat Eating Disorders UK’ (ARFID - Beat (beateatingdisorders.org.uk)) and ARFID awareness UK (ARFID Awareness UK). The NHS webpage on eating disorders links to the Beat website in its section on ARFID. A position paper has been written by members of the ARFID Special Interest Group (ARFID SIG), which is part of the British Dietetic Association (BDA). Locally, a number of NHS trusts have produced guidance for parents and health care professionals, such as this from Cambridge. In 2021-22, the British Paediatric Surveillance Unit, part of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health undertook a surveillance study in the UK and Republic of Ireland to establish incidence rates (number of new cases) of ARFID in children and young people presenting to secondary health care, and also to get information on ARFID, specifically on referral pathways, patterns of presentation, and clinical features (eating behaviours, medical complications and the types of medical or psychiatric presentations it is associated with). This study has not reported yet. A systematic review of the literature by the same authors published in 2023 concluded that ‘The current literature on the epidemiology of ARFID in children and adolescents is limited. Studies are heterogeneous with regard to setting and sample characteristics, with a wide range of prevalence estimates. Further studies, especially using surveillance methodology, will help to better understand the nature of this disorder and estimate clinical service needs. We will refer this report to our surveillance team so that the inclusion of ARFID can be considered when our eating disorders guideline is next reviewed, or when the literature on ARFID has matured sufficiently to allow the development of reliable, evidence-based guidance. The NICE guideline surveillance team monitors and reviews new evidence to determine whether guidelines should be updated. An exceptional surveillance review is undertaken when we are alerted to new, significant evidence relevant to the topic. In the meantime, the view of NICE is that clinicians should follow the information provided by specialist groups such as the British Dietetic Association and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health as well as the specific charities. I hope this information is helpful.
Sent To
- Department for Education
- Department of Health and Social Care
- Greater Manchester Integrated Care
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Response Status
Linked responses
2 of 4
56-Day Deadline
10 Apr 2024
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 20th December 2021, I commenced an investigation into the death of Alfie Anthony Kevin Nicholls. The investigation concluded on the 12th January 2024 and the conclusion was one of Narrative: Died suddenly where his death was contributed to by malnutrition which was caused by a severely restricted diet and where the level of malnutrition and the consequential risk it posed was not recognised by professionals until after his death. The medical cause of death was 1a) Sudden death in child with features of malnutrition on a background of developmental delay and an autistic spectrum disorder
Circumstances of the Death
Alfie Anthony Kevin Nicholls was a child with autism who was in full time education at a special school and was under the care of the child development unit. He was also known to children’s services, and there was an allocated social worker to support him and his family. As a consequence of his autism and sensory issues, Alfie had a difficult relationship with food and a restricted diet from a young age. Following him starting school, his diet became increasingly more restricted. Health, Education and Social Services professionals involved in his care did not communicate effectively between themselves or with his family about his diet and so did not have a clear understanding of how severely restricted his diet had become and how extremely limited it was in nutritional value. The risk that his nutritionally poor diet could present to his physical health was not understood or recognised by professionals involved in his care.
On 17th December 2021, he collapsed at his home address and was taken to Stepping Hill Hospital. Attempts to resuscitate him were unsuccessful and he died at Stepping Hill Hospital on 17th December 2021. A post-mortem examination found evidence of significant malnutrition caused, on the balance of probabilities, by his severely restricted diet, that on the balance of probabilities, contributed to his collapse and death on 17th December 2021
On 17th December 2021, he collapsed at his home address and was taken to Stepping Hill Hospital. Attempts to resuscitate him were unsuccessful and he died at Stepping Hill Hospital on 17th December 2021. A post-mortem examination found evidence of significant malnutrition caused, on the balance of probabilities, by his severely restricted diet, that on the balance of probabilities, contributed to his collapse and death on 17th December 2021
Copies Sent To
3) Stockport NHS Foundation Trust; 4) Lisburne School; 5) Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Training for IPC professionals engineers and clinicians
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Staff training and development
IPC role specifications and staffing levels
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Staff training and development
Balancing vulnerability with professional curiosity
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.