[REDACTED]
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2023-0234
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 30 Aug 2023
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Officers struggled to recognise the point for immediate CPR, delaying its commencement, and there was a lack of proactive, focused support from secondary safety officers during a critical incident.
View full coroner's concerns
The police officers who attended acted quickly. They:
- restrained him carefully and safely;
- sought to protect his airway;
- supported his head;
- recognised a medical emergency and potential ABD;
- requested an ambulance;
- looked for a defibrillator;
- responded to an emerging situation and continued to monitor;
- moved to a better location;
- sought additional information that might be of assistance in the resuscitation by running a police national computer (PNC) check, looking for a medical alert amongst belongings and searching the bathroom where it appeared he may have taken drugs;
- noted that he was hot and removed his thick jacket to try to cool him down;
- eventually moved to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); and
- flagged down the ambulance when it arrived in the street.
This was all the more commendable because three out of the four officers were probationers, including the officer who entered the property first and took the lead. The response was described by the Home Office pathologist who gave evidence as exemplary.
However, there were two other aspects of the resuscitation that I want to bring to your attention to help with organisational learning.
1. What was particularly challenging for the officers was knowing when to move to the floor and when to commence CPR.
was in peri arrest/arrest for probably around three and a half minutes before CPR was commenced. Although earlier CPR would not have changed the outcome for him, it might for another casualty.
The intensive care consultant giving evidence at inquest articulated his view of the point at which was in peri arrest. He recognised that this was a difficult call to make, but told me that if in doubt about such an arrest situation, first aiders should move straight to CPR.
I am aware of the work the MPS has undertaken to improve the first aid training of its front line officers. The recognition of the deteriorating patient is notoriously difficult, sometimes even in a hospital setting. However, given that it is a difficulty I have seen recur for the MPS, it seems to me that it would benefit from further consideration.
2. Whilst the officers worked well as a team in many respects, it seemed to me that there could have been more focus on pro-active support from those not directly monitoring vital signs.
For example, the experienced officer who initially held down legs and then later stood close by, would have assisted further if he had been asked. However, because he was confident in his colleagues’ abilities he did not act as what would have been a very useful pair of eyes. He did not provide that focused consideration of a situation that can be so useful when other members of the team are very busy with immediate tasks.
I heard at inquest about the MPS training to speak up, speak out in such a situation. I know that the MPS trains on the value of a helicopter view from a secondary safety officer. However, it seemed to me that this was not completely embedded within the frame of reference of the officers attending. It is not about criticism of one’s colleagues, it is about remaining active in the resuscitation.
I am wary of recommending a counsel of perfection but, as this is an issue I have observed on previous occasions, I feel I would be failing in my duty if I did not raise it with you.
- restrained him carefully and safely;
- sought to protect his airway;
- supported his head;
- recognised a medical emergency and potential ABD;
- requested an ambulance;
- looked for a defibrillator;
- responded to an emerging situation and continued to monitor;
- moved to a better location;
- sought additional information that might be of assistance in the resuscitation by running a police national computer (PNC) check, looking for a medical alert amongst belongings and searching the bathroom where it appeared he may have taken drugs;
- noted that he was hot and removed his thick jacket to try to cool him down;
- eventually moved to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); and
- flagged down the ambulance when it arrived in the street.
This was all the more commendable because three out of the four officers were probationers, including the officer who entered the property first and took the lead. The response was described by the Home Office pathologist who gave evidence as exemplary.
However, there were two other aspects of the resuscitation that I want to bring to your attention to help with organisational learning.
1. What was particularly challenging for the officers was knowing when to move to the floor and when to commence CPR.
was in peri arrest/arrest for probably around three and a half minutes before CPR was commenced. Although earlier CPR would not have changed the outcome for him, it might for another casualty.
The intensive care consultant giving evidence at inquest articulated his view of the point at which was in peri arrest. He recognised that this was a difficult call to make, but told me that if in doubt about such an arrest situation, first aiders should move straight to CPR.
I am aware of the work the MPS has undertaken to improve the first aid training of its front line officers. The recognition of the deteriorating patient is notoriously difficult, sometimes even in a hospital setting. However, given that it is a difficulty I have seen recur for the MPS, it seems to me that it would benefit from further consideration.
2. Whilst the officers worked well as a team in many respects, it seemed to me that there could have been more focus on pro-active support from those not directly monitoring vital signs.
For example, the experienced officer who initially held down legs and then later stood close by, would have assisted further if he had been asked. However, because he was confident in his colleagues’ abilities he did not act as what would have been a very useful pair of eyes. He did not provide that focused consideration of a situation that can be so useful when other members of the team are very busy with immediate tasks.
I heard at inquest about the MPS training to speak up, speak out in such a situation. I know that the MPS trains on the value of a helicopter view from a secondary safety officer. However, it seemed to me that this was not completely embedded within the frame of reference of the officers attending. It is not about criticism of one’s colleagues, it is about remaining active in the resuscitation.
I am wary of recommending a counsel of perfection but, as this is an issue I have observed on previous occasions, I feel I would be failing in my duty if I did not raise it with you.
Responses
Action Planned
The MPS will introduce a "first aid safety officer" role in annual first aid training from April 2024. From April 2024, the MPS will deliver additional ELS Module 2 training (increased from 9-12 hours) which will introduce techniques such as the ‘jaw thrust’ and also provide more practical scenario-based drills. (AI summary)
The MPS will introduce a "first aid safety officer" role in annual first aid training from April 2024. From April 2024, the MPS will deliver additional ELS Module 2 training (increased from 9-12 hours) which will introduce techniques such as the ‘jaw thrust’ and also provide more practical scenario-based drills. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Ms Hassell I am the Deputy Assistant Commissioner for the Directorate of Professional Standards in the Metropolitan Police Service (“MPS”). On behalf of the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, I write to provide the response to the matters of concern addressed to the MPS following the inquest into the death of Mr Emmanuel Seisay and your Report to Prevent Future Deaths dated 5 July 2023. On behalf of the MPS may I express my sincere condolences to the family and friends of Mr Emmanuel Seisay, our thoughts and sympathies are very much with them. The Coroner’s “Matters of Concern” The Prevention of Future Deaths report dated 5 July 2023 records:- “There were two other aspects of the resuscitation that I want to bring to your attention to help with organisational learning.
1. What was particularly challenging for the officers was knowing when to move Mr Seisay to the floor and when to commence CPR.
Mr Seisay was in peri arrest/arrest for probably around three and a half minutes before CPR was commenced. Although earlier CPR would not have changed the outcome for him, it might for another casualty. The intensive care consultant giving evidence at inquest articulated his view of the point at which Mr Seisay was in peri arrest. He recognised that this was a difficult call to make, but told me that if in doubt about such an arrest situation, first aiders should move straight to CPR.
I am aware of the work the MPS has undertaken to improve the first aid training of its front line officers. The recognition of the deteriorating patient is notoriously difficult, sometimes even in a hospital setting. However, given that it is a difficulty I have seen recur for the MPS, it seems to me that it would benefit from further consideration.
MPS Response
Since this incident in March 2021, the MPS has introduced the following changes to the MPS Emergency Life Support (ELS) training, which will assist in reducing any delays in administering CPR.
• The introduction of the trapezius muscle squeeze when checking for a response in order to ensure an accurate response level is established. Additionally the changing of the term unresponsive to unconscious to ensure there is no confusion when informing the London Ambulance Service of the response level.
• Since June 2021, it is mandatory for all officers to complete an agonal breathing digital package which assists in identifying breathing that is not normal and to commence CPR more quickly.
• The introduction of the jaw thrust manoeuvre as standard to open an airway when breathing is noisy, and for a casualty to be maintained on their back with a jaw thrust manoeuvre applied until medical help arrives. The recovery position is only to be used to clear fluid from the airway. Where a jaw thrust manoeuvre does not clear noisy breathing, CPR is commenced immediately.
2. Whilst the officers worked well as a team in many respects, it seemed to me that there could have been more focus on pro-active support from those not directly monitoring Mr Seisay’s vital signs. I heard at inquest about the MPS training to speak up, speak out in such a situation.
I know that the MPS trains on the value of a helicopter view from a secondary safety officer. However, it seemed to me that this was not completely embedded within the frame of reference of the officers attending. It is not about criticism of one’s colleagues, it is about remaining active in the resuscitation. I am wary of recommending a counsel of perfection but, as this is an issue I have observed on previous occasions, I feel I would be failing in my duty if I did not raise it with you.
MPS Response
In April 2024, the MPS will be introducing the “first aid safety officer” as part of the annual first aid training cycle, which all officers are required to attend. This role is for when there are a number of officers dealing with a casualty, one officer steps back and takes an overview of the first aid delivery and requirement and ensures that all checks and monitoring are completed.
In May 2023, the National Police Chief Council endorsed recommendations from its First Aid Forum’s review following the Manchester Arena public inquiry. This increased ELS Module 2 training from 9-12 hours (and increased refresher training by 2 hours). This training will introduce techniques such as the ‘jaw thrust’ and also provide more practical scenario-based drills with the aim of improving officers’ confidence in dealing with casualty situations. The MPS will start to deliver this additional training from April 2024.
Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any queries.
1. What was particularly challenging for the officers was knowing when to move Mr Seisay to the floor and when to commence CPR.
Mr Seisay was in peri arrest/arrest for probably around three and a half minutes before CPR was commenced. Although earlier CPR would not have changed the outcome for him, it might for another casualty. The intensive care consultant giving evidence at inquest articulated his view of the point at which Mr Seisay was in peri arrest. He recognised that this was a difficult call to make, but told me that if in doubt about such an arrest situation, first aiders should move straight to CPR.
I am aware of the work the MPS has undertaken to improve the first aid training of its front line officers. The recognition of the deteriorating patient is notoriously difficult, sometimes even in a hospital setting. However, given that it is a difficulty I have seen recur for the MPS, it seems to me that it would benefit from further consideration.
MPS Response
Since this incident in March 2021, the MPS has introduced the following changes to the MPS Emergency Life Support (ELS) training, which will assist in reducing any delays in administering CPR.
• The introduction of the trapezius muscle squeeze when checking for a response in order to ensure an accurate response level is established. Additionally the changing of the term unresponsive to unconscious to ensure there is no confusion when informing the London Ambulance Service of the response level.
• Since June 2021, it is mandatory for all officers to complete an agonal breathing digital package which assists in identifying breathing that is not normal and to commence CPR more quickly.
• The introduction of the jaw thrust manoeuvre as standard to open an airway when breathing is noisy, and for a casualty to be maintained on their back with a jaw thrust manoeuvre applied until medical help arrives. The recovery position is only to be used to clear fluid from the airway. Where a jaw thrust manoeuvre does not clear noisy breathing, CPR is commenced immediately.
2. Whilst the officers worked well as a team in many respects, it seemed to me that there could have been more focus on pro-active support from those not directly monitoring Mr Seisay’s vital signs. I heard at inquest about the MPS training to speak up, speak out in such a situation.
I know that the MPS trains on the value of a helicopter view from a secondary safety officer. However, it seemed to me that this was not completely embedded within the frame of reference of the officers attending. It is not about criticism of one’s colleagues, it is about remaining active in the resuscitation. I am wary of recommending a counsel of perfection but, as this is an issue I have observed on previous occasions, I feel I would be failing in my duty if I did not raise it with you.
MPS Response
In April 2024, the MPS will be introducing the “first aid safety officer” as part of the annual first aid training cycle, which all officers are required to attend. This role is for when there are a number of officers dealing with a casualty, one officer steps back and takes an overview of the first aid delivery and requirement and ensures that all checks and monitoring are completed.
In May 2023, the National Police Chief Council endorsed recommendations from its First Aid Forum’s review following the Manchester Arena public inquiry. This increased ELS Module 2 training from 9-12 hours (and increased refresher training by 2 hours). This training will introduce techniques such as the ‘jaw thrust’ and also provide more practical scenario-based drills with the aim of improving officers’ confidence in dealing with casualty situations. The MPS will start to deliver this additional training from April 2024.
Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any queries.
Part of a Series
4 separate reports were issued from this inquest, each sent to different organisations.
-
2018-0405
Sent to: Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust;All responded
-
2025-0507
Sent to: East London NHS Foundation Trust;All responded
-
2026-0178
Sent to: College of PolicingHaleon UK Trading LimitedMetropolisNational Crime AgencyNo responses yet
This report (2023-0234) is shown above.
Sent To
- Metropolitan Police Service
Response Status
Linked responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
30 Aug 2023
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 25 March 2021, I commenced an investigation into the death of , aged 44 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest earlier today. I made a determination at inquest that death was drug related. I recorded the medical cause of death as: 1a complications arising from cocaine intoxication.
Circumstances of the Death
On the afternoon of 18 March 2021, took cocaine and went to a friend’s home. He demonstrated features of acute behavioural disturbance (ABD) and police were called. They recognised this as a medical emergency and sought an ambulance, but arrested before the ambulance arrived. With police assistance paramedics achieved a return of spontaneous circulation, but died in hospital the following day.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Triennial Parliamentary Resilience Reports
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency responder equipment training
Staff training and development
Fit-Testing Preparedness
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency responder equipment training
Staff training and development
Use recording equipment during exercises
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Emergency responder equipment training
Staff training and development
Training on use of recording equipment
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Emergency responder equipment training
Staff training and development
Ten Second Triage training for frontline staff
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Emergency responder equipment training
Staff training and development
Police medic training on catastrophic haemorrhage
Jermaine Baker Inquiry
Emergency responder equipment training
Staff training and development
Maximum Continuous Duty Period for AFOs
Anthony Grainger Inquiry
Emergency responder equipment training
Staff training and development
Communicating Sight Deprivation Reasons
Baha Mousa Inquiry
Emergency responder equipment training
Staff training and development
Endorse adoption of defensive driving teaching and practice by TOCs
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Emergency responder equipment training
Staff training and development
Provide signallers with emergency stop options and regular situational briefings on use
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Emergency responder equipment training
Staff training and development
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.