Kieran Crimmins
PFD Report
Historic (No Identified Response)
Ref: 2022-0211
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Crisis team actions were poorly monitored and falsely marked as complete, and significant procedures were communicated inappropriately. A lack of clear re-entry routes for vulnerable discharged patients revealed poor inter-service information sharing.
View full coroner's concerns
(1) I was told that the Crisis Recovery and Home Treatment Team ("CRHT") use the Care Partner records, a whiteboard and a manual diary to enter the various information and action points and that it is at the Multidisciplinary Team meetings that the actions or steps are discussed and progressed. They are either crossed out, if completed, or moved to the next date until they have been actioned. It was highlighted that in this particular case two actions were not completed either prior to Kieran’s discharge from the CRHT or shortly thereafter. In one of these, the entry had been crossed out, giving the impression that the matter had, in fact been dealt with when it had not. This indicated that there was an issue as to the monitoring and execution of such actions or steps. This anomaly whereby a significant step may have been overlooked remains a concern.
(2) The evidence I heard from one witness described how she was asked to contact Kieran by telephone and to advise him of the fact that a Multi-agency Referral Form (“MARF”) was to be submitted. I considered this was an inappropriate means of communicating a significant procedure and which could potentially bear on his (or any other vulnerable person's) state of mind. What was unclear is how the provision of this information and step to be taken will be approached in future.
(3) I expressed concern that someone having been discharged from the CRHT, there appeared to be no route back into the Mental Health Service short of a re-referral to the CRHT itself via A & E for someone who remains vulnerable by reason of their mental state and who is receiving therapy as part of the discharge plan. This is in the context of someone who was receiving support from the Integrated Psychology Therapy Service (“IPTS”) and the Dyfed Drug and Alcohol Service (“DDAS”), both of whom were engaged in providing appropriate therapies. My concern is that there appears to be an issue in relation to lines of communication and information sharing between Primary Mental Health Services and Tier 2 providers of therapy.
(2) The evidence I heard from one witness described how she was asked to contact Kieran by telephone and to advise him of the fact that a Multi-agency Referral Form (“MARF”) was to be submitted. I considered this was an inappropriate means of communicating a significant procedure and which could potentially bear on his (or any other vulnerable person's) state of mind. What was unclear is how the provision of this information and step to be taken will be approached in future.
(3) I expressed concern that someone having been discharged from the CRHT, there appeared to be no route back into the Mental Health Service short of a re-referral to the CRHT itself via A & E for someone who remains vulnerable by reason of their mental state and who is receiving therapy as part of the discharge plan. This is in the context of someone who was receiving support from the Integrated Psychology Therapy Service (“IPTS”) and the Dyfed Drug and Alcohol Service (“DDAS”), both of whom were engaged in providing appropriate therapies. My concern is that there appears to be an issue in relation to lines of communication and information sharing between Primary Mental Health Services and Tier 2 providers of therapy.
Sent To
- Hywel Dda University Health Board
Response Status
Linked responses
0 of 1
56-Day Deadline
22 Nov 2022
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 29 March 2019 I commenced an investigation into the death of Kieran Joseph Kevan CRIMMINS. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest . The conclusion of the inquest was Suicide. 3 1a Hanging 1b 1c
Circumstances of the Death
I found that Kieran Joseph Kevan Crimmins took his own life and intended to do so in circumstances where ongoing psychiatric monitoring and support would have been 4 appropriate. A decision was taken not to refer to the Community Mental Health Team for ongoing monitoring of his mental health and care co-ordination following his discharge from the Crisis and Home Treatment Team on the 5th March 2019 due to the fact that he was receiving support from the Dyfed Drug and Alcohol Service and the Independent Psychological Therapy Service. Pembrokeshire County Council / Cyngor Sir Benfro NW0C County Hall / Neuadd y Sir Haverfordwest / Hwlffordd
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Community mental health services for violence-fixated children
Southport Inquiry
Mental health access for alcohol addiction
Mental health assessment powers for isolated children
Southport Inquiry
Mental health access for alcohol addiction
Independent review of use of force on mentally ill detainees
Brook House Inquiry
Mental health access for alcohol addiction
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.